Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on July 21st, 2010 by Tom Arah

Xara: 15 years of next-generation graphics

blog xara

One of the first reviews I wrote for PC Pro back in 1995 was a review of the “new generation of graphics software”, Xara Studio. I recently wrote another Xara review this time of its latest incarnation, Xara Photo and Graphic Designer 6, and it reminded me just what it was that made Xara stand out.

Xara was such a revolutionary and exciting departure because it took a very different approach to the likes of CorelDRAW and Illustrator. Where these programs concentrated on PostScript-based graphic design built on stroked paths with solid or graduated fills, Xara let you mix up vector handling with pixel-based bitmap effects such as anti-aliased outlines, texture fills, soft shadows and graduated transparency; you could even cut out elements from placed photos and include them in your compositions. Put all these features together and for the first time users could draw truly realistic artwork and, thanks to Xara’s blistering speed, could do so in real time.

Of course nowadays Xara’s current rivals offer all the features that made Xara Studio stand out – vector aliasing, graduated transparency, soft shadows, textured fills and masked bitmaps. However compared to Xara’s direct, hands-on approach both Illustrator and CorelDRAW’s integration of bitmap handling tends to be very technical and almost deliberately hidden away. For example I’m sure many Illustrator users have never realised that they can load a bitmap, drag it onto the Swatches panel and then apply it as a tiled fill; by contrast Xara encourages just this sort of creative experimentation with its dedicated Fills gallery full of ready-to-use tiling textures. More importantly Xara’s sheer speed of handling still puts its rivals to shame.

Moreover over the last 15 years, Xara has kept innovating across both vector and bitmap fields, most obviously with its introduction of non-destructive plug-in effects, artistic brushes and impressive real-time 3D rendering. The latest release continues that tradition with advanced features such as content aware scaling and zooming and the introduction of lens-based adjustments that can be applied to underlying vectors or bitmaps.

In fact Xara now promotes Xara Photo and Graphic Designer 6 as a dedicated image enhancement package as well as drawing app (hence the ugly new name), letting you open bitmap files as special photo documents which you can enhance using non-destructive lens adjustments complete with feathering and graduated transparency. Xara’s speed and creative flexibility are real advantages here, but without direct pixel editing I can’t see many people using it in this way and Xara’s true strength remains creative composition combining pixel handling within an object-oriented vector framework.

For traditional artists the difference between drawing and painting comes down to whether you pick up a pencil or a brush and the computer-based chasm between vector and bitmap handling seems artificial, rigid and creatively destructive. Xara is still the program that comes closest to bridging this vector/bitmap divide and means that in many ways it is still as revolutionary and exciting as it was 15 years ago. Moreover at a price of just £69 inc VAT – a fraction of the cost of an upgrade to Illustrator or CorelDRAW – Xara puts its better-known rivals to shame in more ways than one.

Tags: , , ,

Posted in: Real World Computing, Software

Permalink

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

8 Responses to “ Xara: 15 years of next-generation graphics ”

  1. N Says:
    July 21st, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    Isn’t the feature set of Illustrator more comparable with Xara Designer Pro 6 though? There is no CMYK handaling in the Standard Xara. The Pro version is £249 which is still good value…

     
  2. Tom Arah Says:
    July 21st, 2010 at 5:44 pm

    Yes for capabilities such as colour seps, multiprocessor support and advanced HTML output you need the Pro version. You can see the full comparison at http://www.xara.com/uk/products/designer/compare/ which highlights just how much Pro functionality the standard version delivers

     
  3. Alperian Says:
    July 22nd, 2010 at 10:38 am

    I remember when it was CorelXara and it was much more quick and accessible than CorelDraw, but it was always thrown into the market with little care.

    It was great for logo design, but you would always re-draw in Illustrator when a decision had been made.

    Always on PC, so graphic studios would never accept it seriously.

    Even our clients got wind of it and started using it to illustrate PowerPoint presentations.

    Great for accessing the Corel ’stock’ photo & Clipart CDs with their proprietary formats.

    Possessing vector and bitmap transparency for about £60.00.

    It was the Peter Crouch of Graphics packages. Reasonably talented but always on the bench.

    Thanks for this entry Tom, because I am glad to hear it is still alive.

     
  4. Vierect Says:
    July 23rd, 2010 at 10:04 am

    I am currently using photoshop. I have heard a lot about “Xara” and I am really looking for making a switch over from photoshop to xara.

     
  5. TomArah Says:
    July 23rd, 2010 at 11:27 am

    @Alperian
    Yes Corel distributed the program for a while but it wasn’t a happy experience and eventually Xara escaped.
    Not sure about the Peter Crouch analogy – is he reasonably talented :)
    @Vierect
    As I say in the piece I don’t really buy the idea of using Xara for dedicated photo handling except in special cases. I don’t see the program as a replacement for either Photoshop or Illustrator, but its mix of integrated vector and bitmap handling and sheer speed does provide some exciting creative power that the Adobe apps can’t.

     
  6. Corzair Says:
    July 24th, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    @TomArah
    I been using Xara for a while but not sure i’m going to upgrade from 5 to 6.
    I have upgraded to Serifs DrawPlus4 and have been Using Inkscape also And would like to know your thoughts on these packages.

     
  7. Tim Says:
    July 27th, 2010 at 9:43 am

    @TomArah re Vierect:

    I think you will find this is a spam comment. Hence the peculilar comments accompanied by a dodgy url.

     
  8. Tom Arah Says:
    July 27th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    @Corzair
    I’d definitely recommend upgrading if only for the new interface.
    I think the DrawPlus4 you mention is the free version that you can upgrade to version 8 for £10 which is certainly excellent value. I reviewed version 8 http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/86276/serif-drawplus-8 and was impressed but that was 5 years ago and I haven’t seen the latest X4 release. As for Inkscape I haven’t seen it in action but am slightly sceptical on the basis that is pitched as a SVG only editor. Having said that the screenshots look interesting and I’ll take a better look when I have more time.
    @Tim
    Thanks for pointing that out. I hope he was a real spammer or the automated systems are getting frighteningly believable.

     

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

* required fields

* Will not be published

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010