Posted on October 26th, 2009 by Chris Brennan
The worst part of Windows 7? Internet Explorer
In the latest instalment of our experiment to see whether Windows 7 can convert a hardened Mac user, Chris Brennan tries to get to grips with Internet Explorer

A few years ago I really, really liked Internet Explorer for Mac, but Steve Jobs called Bill Gates a sissy and the Macintosh business unit in Redmond ceased making it. That’s what I was told happened anyway. So it’s been a few years since I used IE in anger.
The Internet is central to what I do professionally and, for better or worse, where I get most of my news and a good chunk of my entertainment, too. On my Mac I use Safari and, I’m not just saying this, it suits me fine. It’s not the greatest thing since sliced bread and neither is it full of magic and ponies.
However, I’ve found Internet Explorer on Windows 7 to be a pain in the proverbial: slow, stuttering and prone to crashing. In all, IE is just a bit rubbish. In fact, so far IE has been the only part of my Windows 7 experience that’s been anything less than moderately good. Perhaps it’s my Apple-centric way of working, but Internet Explorer simply isn’t a tool I’d trust to get me through the day.
I could, of course, search the support forums to find answers to my issues. Why, for instance, does a URL redirect from bit.ly seem to fry IE’s brains? Or why with three tabs open does it grind to a halt and simply pretend to open a page? I want it to just work and it doesn’t.
I wonder if I’m the only one who finds this with IE or are there millions of people out there who think this is the norm? Is my experience of IE par for the course or a bit unusual?
Also, is the interface supposed to be so appalling? Perhaps it’s me, but the orphaned extra toolbar off to the right-hand side doesn’t make much sense. And then there’s the two Tools menus: one in the aforementioned toolbar and another in the Menu Bar toolbar (which is, admittedly, optional), both of which have different things in them. Have I missed something? Since when do applications have two menus with the same name that have different items in them? Please, please tell me that I am missing something and my tiny Apple-addled brain hasn’t seen the bigger picture.
If Safari were this bad I’d have switched to one of the other browsers quickly, and that’s what I’ve done with IE. Google Chrome is my new default browser. Given that in the coming years it’ll be Google and not Apple that poses the biggest threat to Microsoft’s dominance this doesn’t bode well for the second largest Mac developer and manufacturer of the world’s leading operating system and browser.
Click here to read the rest of Chris Brennan’s blogs on coverting from Mac to Windows 7
Tags: Internet Explorer 8, mac, Windows 7
Posted in: Windows 7
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
20 Responses to “ The worst part of Windows 7? Internet Explorer ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement


October 26th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
I may be missing the point, but you know that you can just use another browser – even Safari if you must. I am not clear what IE being pants (which it is) has to do with whether or not to make the move to Windows 7.
October 26th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
If you compare Internet Explorer to any browser, it will always come last.
Though I’m more happy that Microsoft have concentrated on getting Windows working very well on a plethora of hardware (remember, Apple don’t have that issue).
I merely see Internet Explorer as the disregarded bit of software that lets me install another browser.
The EU ‘browser chooser’ page for Windows 7 can’t come quick enough.
October 26th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
Glad to hear you’re enjoying Windows 7. Yeah dump IE and get Firefox though. It really is pants
October 26th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
I think your experience is slightly unusual because, once you wade through the tribal allegiance stuff, IE may be somewhat incompatible – but I haven’t seen it actually crashing inside Windows 7 as yet. I agree, it has it’s stupidities (like, I can’t edit my blog entries here with it…!!) but you may need to work out what the crash is caused by. What anti-virus are you using? Have yo uagreed to any installs that bring toolbars with them?
October 26th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
IE8 -
“Why, for instance, does a URL redirect from bit.ly seem to fry IE’s brains? Or why with three tabs open does it grind to a halt and simply pretend to open a page?”
These are not issues I have encountered. And, let’s be honest, this was supposed to be a blog about your experience with Windows 7 not IE8.
If we’re generous and put indulge your side-tracking into IE8:
“So it’s been a few years since I used IE in anger” – really? And you’re a journalist. How odd.
“On my Mac I use Safari and, I’m not just saying this, it suits me fine. It’s not the greatest thing since sliced bread and neither is it full of magic and ponies.” – so we have a decent basis to consider the rest of your comments on.
“However, I’ve found Internet Explorer on Windows 7 to be a pain in the proverbial: slow, stuttering and prone to crashing. In all, IE is just a bit rubbish. In fact, so far IE has been the only part of my Windows 7 experience that’s been anything less than moderately good.”
Two strings here…firstly, one would wonder what about IE in Windows 7 is slow, stuttering and prone to crashing. Can you provide empirical evidence to prove that your experience is true? Secondly, I’m sure you agree that the term “good” either is or isn’t, we cannot have “moderately good” let alone “less than moderately good”.
“Perhaps it’s my Apple-centric way of working, but Internet Explorer simply isn’t a tool I’d trust to get me through the day” – I’m not sure I understand…doesn’t IE give you access to the internet and all the sites you need to access?
“Also, is the interface supposed to be so appalling? Perhaps it’s me, but the orphaned extra toolbar off to the right-hand side doesn’t make much sense. And then there’s the two Tools menus: one in the aforementioned toolbar and another in the Menu Bar toolbar (which is, admittedly, optional), both of which have different things in them. Have I missed something? Since when do applications have two menus with the same name that have different items in them? Please, please tell me that I am missing something and my tiny Apple-addled brain hasn’t seen the bigger picture”
Clearly, this is you. Do you really find the interface “appalling”? Get real and wake up fellah, clearly it works. To call the interface appalling because it is not what you’re use yo or what you would design is ridiculous.
“If Safari were this bad I’d have switched to one of the other browsers quickly, and that’s what I’ve done with IE.” – obviously you’ve switched to Safari for Windows then?
“Google Chrome is my new default browser. Given that in the coming years it’ll be Google and not Apple that poses the biggest threat to Microsoft’s dominance this doesn’t bode well for the second largest Mac developer and manufacturer of the world’s leading operating system and browser.”
And here I was thinking this was a blog about whether Windows 7 could convert a Mac user.
October 26th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Dare I say this – I actually quite like IE8. I’ve tried Firefox and it was okay but I’m used to IE8, its got some neat features (accelerators fo example), its fast enough, and on my machines very stable. I don’t think it is quite the dog that some people would have you beleive…
October 26th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
I agree 100% with everything you have said, the only reason for me to still keep using IE as my preferred 3rd browser is Microsoft products (Dynamics CRM I am looking at you) still force you to use the monstrosity that is IE. My default browser is Google Chrome and use Firefox for other certain tasks and then IE for the ones at which I am forced. I welcome the day Microsoft finally realises they have lost market share, maybe then they will listen to the end user more often, just like they have done with Windows 7. Not that they have lost a large share in the OS market but it took something drastic for them to realise they needed to listen more.
October 26th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
I’m not sure if IE is a way of comparing the 2 os’s. The point is that there are choices (and none more so than in the pc arena). If IE8 was your only choice than I would agree with you… but it isn’t.
I always say to my fellow mac people: “if you want a mac then get one… if you want to try a pc (windows) then open your mind to the way of PC/windows-thinking and stop trying to make it into a mac!!”
The biggest difference is options.. far more in PC/win-world.. which isn’t necessarily better I agree.
Finally I look forward you to comparing the other most used applications. Outlook vs ical/entourage and address book etc.
October 26th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
most savvy pc users do not use ie. many refuse to as it’s a security risk.
recommend firefox with following add ons: ad block pro, no script, a download accelerator, and web search pro
October 26th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Chill out people. He doesn’t like IE8. It is part of the Windows 7 OS. Yes you can change it which he has but it was a comment that 40% of the world tend to agree with. I’ve had plenty of issues with it. Tabs refusing to open or taking ages to populate that you don’t get with others browsers. I still think Windows 7 is great. Just not IE8
October 26th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
@Alan
If you were that savvy you would realise that IE8 security is on a par with other browsers. If you don’t believe me, check out secunia.com. All browsers have vulnerabilities.
October 26th, 2009 at 7:54 pm
@Richard
Oh please. That’s like saying that two different TVs are exactly the same because they can all get a 480i signal (for those of you whom are clueless, 480i is /very/ low resolution compared to HD).
TV “A”, for example, is a small square box (aka “tube”) that receives channels just fine but has a bad remote that sometimes doesn’t work and it drains the battery life a lot. TV “B”, however, is a 720p (aka “HD”) resolution TV with many, many options for cables (multiple RCA, Component, HDMI etc. ports), a great picture, and a solar-powered remote!
Which of the two seems better? Sure, both of them can receive channels, but TV “B” (aka ‘every browser besides IE almost) can not only do more but can do it all better. Might I mention the fact that IE doesn’t support HTML5 audio/video but Firefox, Opera, Safari, and Chrome do?
October 27th, 2009 at 11:17 am
I must admit, whilst I’m not a fan, I’ve not had any issues with IE8. I’ve been using it since probably July and don’t recall any crashes. I prefer Firefox and the way it works but that DOES crash quite a lot. IE8, as you would expect, renders Microsoft stuff better than the other browsers. Outlook Web Access being the main one for me. Also, my MSDN stuff will ONLY work with IE – surprise, surprise. So, whilst I agree it isn’t the best, I would say your experience is sub-par.
October 27th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
I can’t say I’ve had any browser crash on me in the last couple of years. They are all pretty stable.
I prefer Firefox for daily browsing, mainly because of NoScript and FlashBlocker
October 28th, 2009 at 10:12 am
@ Chris Brennan
Here’s a massive annoyance we’ve just had on our two new iMacs (well, old-new, as they’re 24 inchers!):
We bought them with the extra AppleCare warranty package – we need to if we want to shunt them over to our new Managed Service when it goes live in March – and one of my guys has just spent a VERY frustrating 20 minutes trying to get the mandatory details in. The details page worked out he was in the UK right enough, but wouldn’t let him add anything to the ‘State’ (yeah, because we have states here…) field – no option in the drop-down list, no ability to type, nothing! So he moved on…
Apple had helpfully auto-filled the phone numbers – but missed off the ‘0′. Couldn’t add it either, until it was worked out that Apple had helpfully omitted the first digit of the area code and added the first two of the number, thereby making the box hit its 6 character limit! So, all the numebrs got changed, all checked to make sure everything was ok, except for the state.
Wasn’t expecting four errors!
At least now he could add the county – manually.
But the numbers were all still invalid, it reckoned. We double-checked – all had the correct 5-digit error code and 6-digit number, but nope, still wrong according to Apple. We tried it with the ‘+44′ instead of the ‘0′, although there wasn’t enough room, tried it without the ‘0′ in case Apple didn;’t want that, but nothing. Zip. Nada.
Eventually, we just removed all the numbers to see what that did and lo and behold, their previous status as ‘Invalid numbers’ was gone!
But Apple don’t appear to like UK numbers for the registration of a UK warranty on a UK product and there’s very little guidance given – the red lettering at the top makes it seem as though the information is mandatory and you cannot proceed without its input, yet you enter correct numbers and it tells you it’s wrong!
After he went through that rigmarole, it asked my guy if he wanted to register any other Apple products onto AppleCare. He said yes, to do the other Mac. The page returned a message saying ‘This product is not suitable for this warranty’! Same iMac type, same warranty type, purchased at the same time, with the same info added!
Very user friendly user-experience all round and I will most definitely recommend iMacs on this basis to all my friends and family. Did I mention I hate them?
Yes, PC OEMs can do similar things, but that’s up to the OEM – and I’ve installed and registered warranties for HP, IBM, Dell, Lenovo, Toshiba, Acer, Asus, Mesh, RM and Samsung computers and I have NEVER come across a more obtuse, unhelpful system.
Yes, possibly the wrong place, btu I needed to vent and the AppleCare registration form is basically a web page, so this kinda fits!
October 28th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
richard
yes all browsers have holes. yes, i’ve heard ie8 is much better. however, it’s new so has yet to gain traction among users that moved to firefox because it was much more secure than 1e6.
ps- i’m not that savvy and apologize for the implication that i was. i should have said, ’savvy users (not necessarily meaning me)…’
October 29th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
ha ha! one simple typo and you guys are up in arms… I think that appalling was meant to be appealing (did you use a spell-checker, I think that may have done it).
I’m really not sure what the furore is over the browser, if Chris also checks out the mail and the calendar gadgety thing that’s built into windows, and there are other, better, 3rd party options available, it still doesn’t stop him from commenting on it, as its also part of winSe7en, is it not?
I guess Chris is trying to cover as many aspects of using the OS as he can – by using it and seeing the bits that jump out.
October 30th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
To the people who say IE8 is fine: Its only because us web developers spend countless hours hacking our code to suit Microsoft browsers.
Try viewing some HTML5 stuff in IE8 – lol. google “chrome experiments” to view some.
October 30th, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Html5 is still a draft much like css3. you can spend hours “hacking” your code so it suits other browsers too.
If you are able to code with standards, and know the ins and outs of the major browsers, you don’t even need hacks for your layout to look good.
To me you are just jumping in the “ie is bad because other ppl say it is” boat.
While i do agree that ie is a security hazard, because its so tied up with the os and updates for it are handled by the update manager for windows. also, unfortunately, updates for it are slower than in other browsers.
Extensions are the selling point for firefox, its heavy memory usage compared to opera, or google chrome is rather large. If opera had good interpretation of tables and firebug, adblock+, etc i would change to it in a second.
Try viewing some css3 in firefox, lulz ensured. zz.
November 25th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
IE8 doesnt opens on 2nd or 3rd time for me on windows7 anyone else found this or do you all want to talk about how bad IE is ?