<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mollom: What&#8217;s in a Name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/16/mollom-whats-in-a-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/16/mollom-whats-in-a-name/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Hardwick</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/16/mollom-whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-111397</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Hardwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=8815#comment-111397</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fair point. I did audit a lot of CMS systems before choosing one as my general use one, but it was a subjective audit :)

I tend to use typo3 as default unless it&#039;s obvious that it doesn&#039;t excel in the right areas. Or for small to medium sized websites. Typo3 needs quite a bit of grunt. You can set up a pretty good static file cacheing system for it, but it takes a lot of configuring to get certain elements to cache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fair point. I did audit a lot of CMS systems before choosing one as my general use one, but it was a subjective audit <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I tend to use typo3 as default unless it&#8217;s obvious that it doesn&#8217;t excel in the right areas. Or for small to medium sized websites. Typo3 needs quite a bit of grunt. You can set up a pretty good static file cacheing system for it, but it takes a lot of configuring to get certain elements to cache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Arah</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/16/mollom-whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-111373</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=8815#comment-111373</guid>
		<description>Hi Ralph. The post was slightly tongue-in-cheek and flippant so I didn&#039;t feel obliged to include see-it-from-all-sides qualifications, but I accept your point that there&#039;s no single best cms as it depends on the user and the job. 

However I think you fall into exactly the same trap when you say that Typo3 is &quot;objectively more technically accomplished and capable&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ralph. The post was slightly tongue-in-cheek and flippant so I didn&#8217;t feel obliged to include see-it-from-all-sides qualifications, but I accept your point that there&#8217;s no single best cms as it depends on the user and the job. </p>
<p>However I think you fall into exactly the same trap when you say that Typo3 is &#8220;objectively more technically accomplished and capable&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Hardwick</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/16/mollom-whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-111280</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Hardwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=8815#comment-111280</guid>
		<description>Very bold claims there....the most powerful open source content management system.....well. No. It isn&#039;t. Objectively Typo3 is more technically accomplished and capable and subjectively all CMS packages have strengths and weaknesses and a good web developer knows to find the one that fits the website, not shoehorn the website into the CMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very bold claims there&#8230;.the most powerful open source content management system&#8230;..well. No. It isn&#8217;t. Objectively Typo3 is more technically accomplished and capable and subjectively all CMS packages have strengths and weaknesses and a good web developer knows to find the one that fits the website, not shoehorn the website into the CMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicomo</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/16/mollom-whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-111268</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=8815#comment-111268</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dries Buytaert&quot; how is that actually pronounced? As it looks like &quot;Tarts&quot; with a wee Scottish accent, that somebody wants you to &quot;Buy&quot; and &quot;Dry&quot;.

But when I first saw &quot;Drupal&quot; I thought &quot;Drop all&quot; and yes it does sound rather depressing maybe he should rename it to &quot;Grupal&quot; At least that way it might sound like &quot;Group All&quot; :) 
As to Mollom and Drupal being Old English, yes there are roots in Brussels - but nobody dares come forward, maybe check &quot;Dries&quot; friends and folks out.  But with a name like his I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll have had more nicknames thrown at him and will be well prepared with loads of new ones ready for his next package - would be nice if you got in touch with him and ask him about the names he chose, why and more which ones he rejected :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dries Buytaert&#8221; how is that actually pronounced? As it looks like &#8220;Tarts&#8221; with a wee Scottish accent, that somebody wants you to &#8220;Buy&#8221; and &#8220;Dry&#8221;.</p>
<p>But when I first saw &#8220;Drupal&#8221; I thought &#8220;Drop all&#8221; and yes it does sound rather depressing maybe he should rename it to &#8220;Grupal&#8221; At least that way it might sound like &#8220;Group All&#8221; <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
As to Mollom and Drupal being Old English, yes there are roots in Brussels &#8211; but nobody dares come forward, maybe check &#8220;Dries&#8221; friends and folks out.  But with a name like his I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll have had more nicknames thrown at him and will be well prepared with loads of new ones ready for his next package &#8211; would be nice if you got in touch with him and ask him about the names he chose, why and more which ones he rejected <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

