Posted on October 16th, 2009 by Tom Arah
Mollom: What’s in a Name?
Regular readers will know that I am a major fan of Belgian developer Dries Buytaert, the man behind Drupal. Drupal is the most powerful open source content management system and IMHO deserves to replace Dreamweaver as the web designer’s tool of choice. In fact, as far I am concerned, the major factor holding it back from world domination, apart from its precipitous learning curve, is its name. Let’s face it “Drupal” (pronounced “droople”) sounds old, ugly, gloomy and deflating. It’s almost perversely uninspiring. “Dreamweaver” it ain’t.
Now I’ve come across a brand name that’s possibly even worse…
Mollom. Mollom is an interesting new online service designed to help cut down the amount of spam comments and content that Web 2.0 sites have to deal with while avoiding putting off genuine contributors with unnecessary captcha barriers. The technology might be cutting-edge but the name certainly isn’t, in fact it sounds medieval. Moreover, like “Drupal”, “Mollom” manages to pull off the difficult trick of being pathetically comical and seriously depressing at the same time.
Astonishingly the man behind Mollom is none other than… Dries Buytaert.
Surely this has to be too much of a coincidence? And I think I’ve found a clue to what’s going on. While selecting a language for Mollom to operate in, I was rather surprised to be offered the choice of Old English and Middle English (I’m not joking, take a look at the screenshot).

Mollom's language choice
Two obvious possibilities spring to mind. Does anyone know if there’s a thriving community of Old English speakers that has somehow lived on in Belgium? Alternatively, does anyone know if there are a pair of ugly giants or dwarves in Beowulf or Tolkein called “Drupal” and “Mollom”?
And does anyone have any suitably uninspiring suggestions for Dries’ next project?
Tags: cms, digital design, dreamweaver, dries, drupal, mollom
Posted in: Rant, Real World Computing
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
4 Responses to “ Mollom: What’s in a Name? ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk




























October 16th, 2009 at 7:55 pm
“Dries Buytaert” how is that actually pronounced? As it looks like “Tarts” with a wee Scottish accent, that somebody wants you to “Buy” and “Dry”.
But when I first saw “Drupal” I thought “Drop all” and yes it does sound rather depressing maybe he should rename it to “Grupal” At least that way it might sound like “Group All”
As to Mollom and Drupal being Old English, yes there are roots in Brussels – but nobody dares come forward, maybe check “Dries” friends and folks out. But with a name like his I’m sure he’ll have had more nicknames thrown at him and will be well prepared with loads of new ones ready for his next package – would be nice if you got in touch with him and ask him about the names he chose, why and more which ones he rejected
October 16th, 2009 at 11:41 pm
Very bold claims there….the most powerful open source content management system…..well. No. It isn’t. Objectively Typo3 is more technically accomplished and capable and subjectively all CMS packages have strengths and weaknesses and a good web developer knows to find the one that fits the website, not shoehorn the website into the CMS.
October 17th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
Hi Ralph. The post was slightly tongue-in-cheek and flippant so I didn’t feel obliged to include see-it-from-all-sides qualifications, but I accept your point that there’s no single best cms as it depends on the user and the job.
However I think you fall into exactly the same trap when you say that Typo3 is “objectively more technically accomplished and capable”.
October 17th, 2009 at 8:37 pm
It’s a fair point. I did audit a lot of CMS systems before choosing one as my general use one, but it was a subjective audit
I tend to use typo3 as default unless it’s obvious that it doesn’t excel in the right areas. Or for small to medium sized websites. Typo3 needs quite a bit of grunt. You can set up a pretty good static file cacheing system for it, but it takes a lot of configuring to get certain elements to cache.