Posted on September 30th, 2009 by Tom Arah
Google Picasa 3.5: First Look – Wow
Hot on the heels of the latest Photoshop Elements 8 (click for full review) comes the new Picasa 3.5.
This adds a few features across the board, such as a revamp of importing and various interface tweaks, but the clear focus of the new release is on in-depth tagging of images via a new side panel that offers three tabs for applying text-based tags, locational geodata and new face-based tags.

To be honest my heart sank when I heard this – what I’ve always liked about Picasa is that it keeps things simple and doesn’t treat managing your photos as a full-time job. Moreover I’d recently come away less than impressed with Photoshop Elements 8’s new face tagging not so much because the technology doesn’t work (it does though imperfectly), but rather because the gains aren’t worth the effort.
So how does the new Picasa 3.5 shape up?
Brilliantly.
I’m still too lazy to be a huge fan of intensive text-based meta tagging but Picasa clearly needed to improve its feeble floating Keywords panel and the Tags panel certainly does that. Likewise I don’t suppose many users ever bothered to geotag their their images via Google Earth, but now you can simply call up a Google Map in the Places panel and drag-and-drop your images onto it. Excellent.
The real revelation though is face tagging. Select a folder or album and Picasa does a great job of pulling out the faces in your images – or at least all those looking at the camera – and listing them in the People tab with an “add a name” label next to them. I half-heartedly marked up a few photos of family members while idly thinking how nice it would be to have a week off to go through my entire collection of thousands of images like this…
But then I noticed that Picasa 3.5 had added a new People category to the main navigation panel down the left of the screen. I clicked on the “me” tag and discovered that, based on just one image that I had tagged (with comedy glasses), Picasa had found another 17 images that it was confident was me and another 160 or so that it thought was me. Incredibly all of them were, including many in bad hats and blonde wig (don’t ask). Confirm these suggestions and Picasa goes and finds some more, and then more again and all with astonishing accuracy. I generally don’t like having my photo taken (and it’s my camera) so the fact that Picasa has found over 300 shots of me without a single mistake is remarkable – and more than enough.
It was a similar story with other clearly-defined adult faces, but accuracy with my five-year old twins (non-identical) was unsurprisingly far more hit-and-miss though I think this might well have been because I didn’t bother finding clear images to tag originally (and because I can never get Robbie to look at the camera).
In any case it really didn’t matter because it’s incredibly simple to select the incorrect suggestions and drag them to the right tag. In fact the whole process is actively enjoyable.
That’s something I never thought I’d be able to say about the prospect of tagging thousands of images containing even more faces.
Ultimately human nature means that most people are most interested in pictures of people, and especially pictures of themselves and their friends and family. With another brilliant search technology under its belt – bitmap-based faces – Google makes a previously unthinkable chore into a real joy. Superb.
And did I mention that it’s free?
Tags: digital design, face recognition, Google, Photoshop Elements, Picasa, search, tagging
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
11 Responses to “ Google Picasa 3.5: First Look – Wow ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement


October 1st, 2009 at 10:44 am
After reading this i downloaded it and set it running on my pics. The face recognitions is brilliant. It even picked up my wife’s face in a photo in a photo and someone’s face reflected in a car wing mirror!
Had two false positives though. One was a sealion, which I must admit could look like a politician’s face if you squint a bit. The other was a wheel arch and tyre.
But out of the hundreds of faces in my pics I think that’s an excellent hit rate.
October 1st, 2009 at 12:04 pm
Much as I hate to look a gift horse in the mouth, I’m less overjoyed by Picasa 3.5. I have lots of photos of my sons’ rugby matches and Picasa listed 16,000 faces as ‘unnamed’. That’s fine, I thought, working steadily through the faces of strangers and telling Picasa to ‘ignore’ them. The trouble is, Picasa doesn’t. No matter how many times I tell it to ignore a face the same ones keep popping up again as suggested matches asking to be confirmed. It’s almost impossible to make any progress because you’re constantly dismissing faces you’d dismissed twenty times already, knowing deep down they’ll only pop up somewhere else shortly.
And when you have that many faces available, believe me, it comes up with some very odd matches. Few people would suggest my silver-haired mother of 94 resembles a sweaty 15-year-old kid wearing a helmet and chewing on a gumshield, but Picasa does. I suppose I could tolerate that if the ‘ignore face’ button actually worked… but it don’t…
October 1st, 2009 at 12:23 pm
When apple announced face recog on iPhoto and mentioned that it wouldn’t work on dogs, I asked if it worked on Michael Jackson (then, still around)… they all developed that slightly puckered look that presenters get when threatened with the giggles!
October 1st, 2009 at 1:29 pm
re: NellieIrrelevant
I wonder if the ignore face option only ignores that instance of the face, rather than using it to build a ‘pattern’ to ignore globally.
Maybe they should have two ignore options, ‘ignore once’ and ‘ignore always’.
I must admit most of my photos don’t have many unknown people in, just friends and family so that wasn’t much of an issue for me. Maybe they’ll sort it out in version 4.
October 1st, 2009 at 2:48 pm
This has worked pretty well for me too, although it does seem a good idea to leave it to search fully before starting. You can then first tag the most common ones (which appear to be listed first) which will hopefully account for most of the photos, if not most of the 1000s of faces it will pick up. You may get better luck with ignoring by actually deleting the tag rather than ignoring the face.
October 1st, 2009 at 3:03 pm
Leave it to search fully? I left it running all last weekend! Don’t know what you mean by deleting the tag, but somehow I suspect the software doesn’t function as well when the databases are very very large.
October 12th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
Am I the only one chilled to the bone by this technology and the fact it is Google with it? Imagine the privacy implications of this applied to really large collections of images and video like Flickr and Youtube – imagine it applied to all the surveillance cameras about the place!
October 13th, 2009 at 4:31 pm
Neither am I very keen on this innovation. I’ve gone back to the previous version of Picasa hoping that in the next version this feature will be optional and can be switched off.
October 13th, 2009 at 5:16 pm
You can switch off face detection and suggestions and manage thresholds under Tools > Options.
As an update after my initial trial I decided to look at my full collection of some 60,000 images.
Again for adults it was brilliant eg finding almost 600 images of me without any errors.
I think that must be because I don’t look like any of my friends and because I haven’t changed much over the last ten years.
The work involved sorting out the images of my twins and especially their younger cousins was vastly more work as they look more similar and they change markedly over time (in retrospect I think I would have been better off having different tags for different ages especially for babies).
Even so it took me a few hours to categorize around 10,000 suggestions which I think was well worth the effort.
As I said in the post it’s not comprehensive recognition of every person in every image – if you want that you’re going to have to manually tag every image. What it offers instead is a different way in to your images based on what people are most interested in ie full-on faces.
With 10,000 suggested faces categorized I’m now perfectly happy to leave the other 10,000 as unnamed, to deal with the new suggestions Picasa makes when I add new images, and to get on with my life.
October 13th, 2009 at 7:09 pm
I couldn’t stop it scanning all my pictures for faces. I could live with the facility if you could do that and hide or delete the People “folder”.
October 13th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
Ah I think that I’ve cracked this. As face detection is set on by default, as soon as you run the new version it starts scanning. Even if you go to options and disable face detection it is too late as it completes the scan and sets up the People “folder”. What I’ve done is to set folder manager to select no picture folders, install the update, deselect face detection and then use folder manager to select my picture folders. Result is no face scanning and no People “folder”.