<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many MIPS is Honeyball holding?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr, A .Wake.</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/comment-page-1/#comment-108793</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr, A .Wake.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7573#comment-108793</guid>
		<description>You do know that The Roswell &#039;incident&#039; occurred on or about July 8, 1947 and was initially &#039;exposed&#039; by Major Jesse Marcel. I think the first poster is hinting that after the recovery of alien technology the planets total MIPS was a lot larger than was publicly admitted or believed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know that The Roswell &#8216;incident&#8217; occurred on or about July 8, 1947 and was initially &#8216;exposed&#8217; by Major Jesse Marcel. I think the first poster is hinting that after the recovery of alien technology the planets total MIPS was a lot larger than was publicly admitted or believed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/comment-page-1/#comment-108748</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7573#comment-108748</guid>
		<description>I remember booting VAXes off tiny tape cartridges! this was the period when the disk controller subsystem test program played chess with you (because it was a complete PDP-11). The idea that all the world&#039;s TFlops might produce nothing more interesting than Twitter, was a long way away back then...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember booting VAXes off tiny tape cartridges! this was the period when the disk controller subsystem test program played chess with you (because it was a complete PDP-11). The idea that all the world&#8217;s TFlops might produce nothing more interesting than Twitter, was a long way away back then&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milliganp</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/comment-page-1/#comment-108637</link>
		<dc:creator>milliganp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7573#comment-108637</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be happy to guess something in the late 70&#039;s or early 80&#039;s. The Vax was the machine that defined Mips (they used to be called VAX mips). In 1978 DEC were building less than 1000 VAX systems per year -and that was the most powerful minicomputer available. IBM s370&#039;s were capable of 20-30 MIPS, but those sold in hundreds of units a year so the two biggest manufactures together were probaly shipping less than 20,000 mips per year. The wafer probably does 2+ million mips -up to 100x the total worlwide computer production in the mid 70&#039;s.
Moore&#039;s law has brought us a long way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be happy to guess something in the late 70&#8217;s or early 80&#8217;s. The Vax was the machine that defined Mips (they used to be called VAX mips). In 1978 DEC were building less than 1000 VAX systems per year -and that was the most powerful minicomputer available. IBM s370&#8217;s were capable of 20-30 MIPS, but those sold in hundreds of units a year so the two biggest manufactures together were probaly shipping less than 20,000 mips per year. The wafer probably does 2+ million mips -up to 100x the total worlwide computer production in the mid 70&#8217;s.<br />
Moore&#8217;s law has brought us a long way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/comment-page-1/#comment-108310</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7573#comment-108310</guid>
		<description>This seemed to me like a question for Wolfram Alpha. It snootily says that Gflops and &quot;megainstructions per second&quot; are not compatible units, presumably because a floating point op may require a variable number of instructions... so maybe MIPS is the wrong unit. Taking Ian&#039;s late night maths as a starting point, I found this: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/talks/singapore_public.pdf and page 10 suggests the year 2000!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seemed to me like a question for Wolfram Alpha. It snootily says that Gflops and &#8220;megainstructions per second&#8221; are not compatible units, presumably because a floating point op may require a variable number of instructions&#8230; so maybe MIPS is the wrong unit. Taking Ian&#8217;s late night maths as a starting point, I found this: <a href="http://boinc.berkeley.edu/talks/singapore_public.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://boinc.berkeley.edu/talks/singapore_public.pdf</a> and page 10 suggests the year 2000!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/comment-page-1/#comment-108241</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7573#comment-108241</guid>
		<description>I worked for Intel until 12 weeks ago and it is amazing how blaze you get about wafers, chips etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked for Intel until 12 weeks ago and it is amazing how blaze you get about wafers, chips etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/comment-page-1/#comment-108238</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7573#comment-108238</guid>
		<description>Nothing like a bit of late-night maths:

Assume 300mm diameter wafer, 261mm^2 die.  Wikipedia formula gives maximum dies on the wafe to be ~230, so lets take 90% ish of that - 205

Information at this time of night is sketchy, but lets guess (again) at 48 GFlops per die (seems to be low-end for the beefiest 45nm xeons).

So ~9.8 TFlops, or there about.

(Sorry couldn&#039;t find xeon scores in Mips)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing like a bit of late-night maths:</p>
<p>Assume 300mm diameter wafer, 261mm^2 die.  Wikipedia formula gives maximum dies on the wafe to be ~230, so lets take 90% ish of that &#8211; 205</p>
<p>Information at this time of night is sketchy, but lets guess (again) at 48 GFlops per die (seems to be low-end for the beefiest 45nm xeons).</p>
<p>So ~9.8 TFlops, or there about.</p>
<p>(Sorry couldn&#8217;t find xeon scores in Mips)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Marcel</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/28/how-many-mips-is-honeyball-holding/comment-page-1/#comment-108220</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7573#comment-108220</guid>
		<description>Early in the morning of July 8th 1947 would be my guess the total number of MIPS for the entire planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early in the morning of July 8th 1947 would be my guess the total number of MIPS for the entire planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

