<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Photoshop Elements 8: First Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Cross</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-127645</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-127645</guid>
		<description>I have bought Elements as I wanted both the Organizer features and to start editing more of my photos.

Unfortunately the Organizer is *incredibly* unstable and crashes constantly. This is on a clean install of XP with no third party software running. I have also encountered various other bugs included corrupting my JPEGs (I had to restore from backup). These problems are backed up by others e.g. http://forums.adobe.com/thread/504803?tstart=30 
While the editor might be good value it is badly let down by the organizer.

Adobe seem to have no intention of fixing 2 year old issues and just introduce new bugs with offshored development. They do not release bug fixes.

Conclusion - do **NOT** buy. Picasa or IDImager are far better alternatives (I have unfortunately learned in hindsight).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have bought Elements as I wanted both the Organizer features and to start editing more of my photos.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the Organizer is *incredibly* unstable and crashes constantly. This is on a clean install of XP with no third party software running. I have also encountered various other bugs included corrupting my JPEGs (I had to restore from backup). These problems are backed up by others e.g. <a href="http://forums.adobe.com/thread/504803?tstart=30" rel="nofollow">http://forums.adobe.com/thread/504803?tstart=30</a><br />
While the editor might be good value it is badly let down by the organizer.</p>
<p>Adobe seem to have no intention of fixing 2 year old issues and just introduce new bugs with offshored development. They do not release bug fixes.</p>
<p>Conclusion &#8211; do **NOT** buy. Picasa or IDImager are far better alternatives (I have unfortunately learned in hindsight).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-107854</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-107854</guid>
		<description>Tom: You&#039;ve just reminded me of something. Windows Live Photo Gallery. Okay, yes I know but for the odd panoramic photos I&#039;m sure its fine and its free. (just cover up the name if you must)

Actually as an MCP but a Mac home user I really think iPhoto is the better choice, its cheaper than PSE for a start.

JD: I feel your pain, however if you have so many photos to catalog, may I suggest Aperture 2 from Apple. I promise you will never look back.

Also JD, as a side note, do a search on google &quot;Parallels vs VMware Fusion&quot;. My apology in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: You&#8217;ve just reminded me of something. Windows Live Photo Gallery. Okay, yes I know but for the odd panoramic photos I&#8217;m sure its fine and its free. (just cover up the name if you must)</p>
<p>Actually as an MCP but a Mac home user I really think iPhoto is the better choice, its cheaper than PSE for a start.</p>
<p>JD: I feel your pain, however if you have so many photos to catalog, may I suggest Aperture 2 from Apple. I promise you will never look back.</p>
<p>Also JD, as a side note, do a search on google &#8220;Parallels vs VMware Fusion&#8221;. My apology in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-107791</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-107791</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t adobe on it&#039;s site state whether Elemenst 8 supports Vista 64 OS? I have searched the web and still have found no definite answer. Is it a big secret or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t adobe on it&#8217;s site state whether Elemenst 8 supports Vista 64 OS? I have searched the web and still have found no definite answer. Is it a big secret or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-107686</link>
		<dc:creator>jd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-107686</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using pse for five years but primarily as an organizer and less as a photo editor.  My catalog has over 18,000 images and seems to work well.  Picasa and iPhoto both seemed unable to handle this size of a catalog but I admit that work was done some time ago.  I hate having to run pse in parallels on my iMac but I&#039;ve not found a consumer rated organizer that does as well.  I tried lightroom ($300) but didn&#039;t see a $200 difference so I stuck with pse.  Now that I&#039;ve spent so much time in tagging and identifying pictures in pse I&#039;m pretty well stuck. 

I am going to try exporting the photo meta data in pse and importing it into iPhoto, but from what I hear there is a lot of functionality lost when this is done.  

I will probably skip pse 8 and wait for a windows/7 version when I upgrade my parallels guest os sometime next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using pse for five years but primarily as an organizer and less as a photo editor.  My catalog has over 18,000 images and seems to work well.  Picasa and iPhoto both seemed unable to handle this size of a catalog but I admit that work was done some time ago.  I hate having to run pse in parallels on my iMac but I&#8217;ve not found a consumer rated organizer that does as well.  I tried lightroom ($300) but didn&#8217;t see a $200 difference so I stuck with pse.  Now that I&#8217;ve spent so much time in tagging and identifying pictures in pse I&#8217;m pretty well stuck. </p>
<p>I am going to try exporting the photo meta data in pse and importing it into iPhoto, but from what I hear there is a lot of functionality lost when this is done.  </p>
<p>I will probably skip pse 8 and wait for a windows/7 version when I upgrade my parallels guest os sometime next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Arah</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-107650</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-107650</guid>
		<description>Chris: Totally agree that Picasa offers all that many users will need (see full review at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/237318/picasa-3).

However it&#039;s not a serious editor. If you want capabilities like photo merging for panoramas and combining the best elements from multiple shots and hands-on tools you&#039;re sometimes going to need a serious editor and Elements offers the best around. 

Felix: Very good point. I expected Adobe to make more of a tie-in between Elements and photoshop.com but instead it&#039;s gone with flashy albums and the woeful photoshopshowcase.com

Harry: Yes it is a high upgrade price. I think they must work on the basis that users will only upgrade every couple of releases. 

Doosh: My understanding of previous releases was that it generally worked but that Adobe didn&#039;t specifically support it (http://www.johnrellis.com/psedbtool/photoshopelements-6-7-faq.htm#_PSE_and_Vista). Couldn&#039;t see anything on the Adobe site about the new release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: Totally agree that Picasa offers all that many users will need (see full review at <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/237318/picasa-3)" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/237318/picasa-3)</a>.</p>
<p>However it&#8217;s not a serious editor. If you want capabilities like photo merging for panoramas and combining the best elements from multiple shots and hands-on tools you&#8217;re sometimes going to need a serious editor and Elements offers the best around. </p>
<p>Felix: Very good point. I expected Adobe to make more of a tie-in between Elements and photoshop.com but instead it&#8217;s gone with flashy albums and the woeful photoshopshowcase.com</p>
<p>Harry: Yes it is a high upgrade price. I think they must work on the basis that users will only upgrade every couple of releases. </p>
<p>Doosh: My understanding of previous releases was that it generally worked but that Adobe didn&#8217;t specifically support it (<a href="http://www.johnrellis.com/psedbtool/photoshopelements-6-7-faq.htm#_PSE_and_Vista)" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnrellis.com/psedbtool/photoshopelements-6-7-faq.htm#_PSE_and_Vista)</a>. Couldn&#8217;t see anything on the Adobe site about the new release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doosh</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-107638</link>
		<dc:creator>doosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-107638</guid>
		<description>I have purchased Elements 7 bundle only to find out it did not work on Vista 64. Nothing about this on the box or in your magazine. Will this, version 8 work with 64 bits?
It is funny adding these bits and pieces. Why can&#039;t they include something more usefull like a duplicate finder in the organizer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have purchased Elements 7 bundle only to find out it did not work on Vista 64. Nothing about this on the box or in your magazine. Will this, version 8 work with 64 bits?<br />
It is funny adding these bits and pieces. Why can&#8217;t they include something more usefull like a duplicate finder in the organizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-107635</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-107635</guid>
		<description>I think the upgrade price that Adobe usually offers to existing users is a even bigger rip-off. Typically they only offer a £10 discount to users of the previous version and often you can buy the full version for less than the official upgrade price if you shop around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the upgrade price that Adobe usually offers to existing users is a even bigger rip-off. Typically they only offer a £10 discount to users of the previous version and often you can buy the full version for less than the official upgrade price if you shop around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-107629</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-107629</guid>
		<description>I agree with Chris. I can&#039;t justify the cost of Elements when Picasa will do for most &quot;casual photographers&quot;. In addition, recently I discovered the power of online photo editing tools. PhotoShop Online (registration required) or completely free to use www.pixlr.com. They offer some of the missing features in Picasa or Elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Chris. I can&#8217;t justify the cost of Elements when Picasa will do for most &#8220;casual photographers&#8221;. In addition, recently I discovered the power of online photo editing tools. PhotoShop Online (registration required) or completely free to use <a href="http://www.pixlr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pixlr.com</a>. They offer some of the missing features in Picasa or Elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/23/adobe-photoshop-elements-8-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-107593</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7432#comment-107593</guid>
		<description>In your review can you explain why casual photographers would not be better off just using Picasa? I have nothing against Elements, I just can&#039;t see why I should buy a copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your review can you explain why casual photographers would not be better off just using Picasa? I have nothing against Elements, I just can&#8217;t see why I should buy a copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

