Posted on September 7th, 2009 by David Bayon
Spotify for iPhone: first look
The eagerly awaited music-streaming service Spotify has today arrived on both the iPhone App Store and on Android’s Marketplace, and I’ve been granted a seven-day guest pass to see if it’s really worth that £10-a-month premium account.
Over the course of a year that does seem like a lot of money – particularly as most users will already have huge music collections of their own – but the promise of millions of tracks available on the move is certainly tempting.
Starting up
Once logged in, you’ll be delighted to see all of your desktop playlists seamlessly synced with Spotify on your phone, and if that’s what you’re after you can just dive straight in.
Over Wi-Fi, tracks play immediately; on 3G we had pauses of anything up to ten seconds, and EDGE is even longer. But once the track is going we were only scuppered by the occasional drop-out for a few seconds – and our office is a notorious O2 blackspot.
When tracks are playing the screen looks similar to that of standard iPhone playback, with the usual controls, a CD cover if Spotify can find it, and an extra options button in the top-right corner.
Tap this for details of the album and artist, an option to add it to an existing playlist, and extra shuffle and repeat controls.
Offline playlists
Altering playlists on your desktop client brings a seamless update on the iPhone app too, in mere seconds if you’re on Wi-Fi. And you have the incredible option of turning them all into “Offline playlists”: next time you connect to Wi-Fi the entire playlist will download onto the phone for use at any time.
The limit is a rather odd 3,333 tracks, and all you have to do is connect once every 30 days to prove you’re still a Premium subscriber. That’s a pretty phenomenal amount of music at your fingertips, and conveniently sidesteps those obvious issues while on the tube or out in the wilderness.
Searching is simple enough, with three tabs to arrange results by Tracks, Albums and Artists. It’s not something you’ll want to do regularly with the iPhone keyboard – you’ll create a playlist in a fraction of the time using the desktop client – but it works well for finding that track you just heard in the pub.
That’s the real meat of the app, and the only other addition is a More… button on the homepage, with details of the app, a link to Spotify.com’s help page, and an option for forcing offline mode even in network areas. And that’s your lot. It all works remarkably smoothly and won’t be at all unfamiliar to users of the desktop app.
The caveats
There are a few key issues though. The first is Wi-Fi, which works fine in most cases but currently refuses to work over firewalled networks. So, no office Spotify just yet, and it also casts doubt over the app’s usefulness on public Wi-Fi networks. Spotify representatives have suggested opening port 4070, but in Starbucks that won’t be an option. Rest assured it’s high on the list of fixes being worked on.
Then there’s the iPhone’s annoying single-task way of working. The functionally identical Android app can play tracks in the background while you work, but on the iPhone you have to have Spotify open at all times. Nip out for a second to check your emails and playback will stop dead, although it will continue from that point when you next load it back up.
And finally there’s the issue of battery life. The iPhone’s music player isn’t exactly kind to the battery anyway, but when you’re adding data transfer on top of that too, it becomes greedy to the extreme. A mere half-hour of streaming over 3G has taken a good 25% of my battery bar (on a last-generation iPhone 3G), so I wouldn’t be too confident of using it for the duration of a long train journey. There’s not a great deal Spotify can do about it – although the offline playlist option should reduce the effect by quite a bit.
These are certainly drawbacks, and they must be considered when the cost is a significant £10 a month. But all in all it’s a hugely impressive debut. A few features of the desktop client haven’t made it across – the radio channels and top lists, for example – but as a standalone player for specifically selected tracks and playlists it’s a very tempting proposition.
UPDATE: The battery issue doesn’t seem as bad as I initially thought. Now the setup is done and I have less need to have the screen on and draining the juice, I managed a good half-hour this morning with only a minor dent in the battery bar.
A far greater issue has arisen, though. On a short 20-minute walk from Charing Cross to Soho, my 3G connection dropped out no fewer than six times, each time for around 15 seconds. One of those six times the Spotify app was even kind enough to close itself automatically. It’s annoying enough to put me off, so I guess the offline mode is going to be the major way I’ll be using Spotify from now on.
Tags: Android, iphone, music, playlists, Spotify, streaming
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
12 Responses to “ Spotify for iPhone: first look ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement


September 7th, 2009 at 1:10 pm
“Then there’s the iPhone’s annoying single-task way of working”
Just to point out; this is an iPod/iPhone limitation, and nothing to do with Spotify at all. No application can run in the background except Apple’s own.
September 7th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Sorry, I’m an idiot. I read “Spotify’s annoying single-task way of working”.
As you were
September 7th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
I can just imagine Steve Jobs next week: “And one more thing: it now does real multi-tasking”. Woo hoo! All the fanbois have raptures. Not impressed. This is a showstopper for this particular application.
September 7th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
The other showstopper is the £10 per month fee. Bloody ridiculous.
September 7th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
£10 for as many tunes as you want to listen to in a month with no adverts and you get to have them on your PC and iPod…that’s really not a bad deal to be honest.
OK so you don’t own it but I don’t own the things I watch on Sky either!
September 7th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
Of course with a jailbroken iPhone you can install Backgrounder which as the name implies will allow you to run an app in the background… apparently. Anyone foolhardy enough to give it a go with Spotify?
September 7th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
Backgrounding works just fine on spotify and also syncing playlists over 3g or edge with unrestrictor seem to work also.
Hurray. almost got the iphone doing what is should be able to do anyway
September 10th, 2009 at 6:24 am
Really can’t see this taking off – if you have an iPod Touch or iPhone, why would you want to stream your OWN music, plus not being able to multitask while listening and suffer dropouts.
Whoever on the PC Pro podcast said this was a gamechanger is playing the wrong game.
September 11th, 2009 at 8:55 am
Sahajesh: what do you mean “your OWN music”? The whole point of Spotify is that you get access to _their_ music collection, which is usually a wee bit bigger than most peoples.
September 11th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
Rasmus: Fair comment. I’m still not sold on the idea due to coverage issues (especially with O2) – may be great in London but not so good outside the M25 area. Either way, it’s not for me.
September 22nd, 2009 at 9:40 am
Here a solution to run spotify in the background just like the ipod application does…
http://www.sugarbean.com/2009/09/running-spotify-in-background-on-iphone.html
December 10th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
The paid version of spotify isnt about lack of adverts its about having 3333 offline tracks and being able to chop and change at will.
How good a deal it is depends on how much music you buy/ get a year by how much music you would like to get.
What it essentially represents is bascially a paid extrapolation of piracy thats easier to use and mostly higher quality.
I also disagree about the value, £120 a year is 3 full price videogames. I usually buy at least 5-10 full price games and many older £20 pound games a year.
In terms of entertainment and the fact I listen to music no less than an hour and many days 3 hours looks like a steal to me.
If the service gets established I could see them offering full year one off payments with appropriate discounts to better value perception.