Posted on August 11th, 2009 by Davey Winder
Twitter goes down (again) but will it soon be counted out for good?
Earlier today (Tuesday 11th August) Twitter went down, albeit briefly for around half an hour, with the official status blog reporting first “a site outage” but then changing tone later to say it was busy analysing traffic data to “determine the nature of this attack”.
Of course, while the Twitter servers may well have been up and running in under an hour of going down, the same cannot be said of third party applications which took considerably longer to recover it would seem. Not, it has to be said, as bad as last week following the 15 fat Russians in a revolving door DDoS attack which saw the Twitter service impacted for days and some third party apps struggling to get back up to speed for days after that.There is, as yet, no word from the Twitterati as to exactly what did cause this latest downtime, and if it was indeed an attack then what kind and from where. I suspect, whatever the official reasoning, whatever the evidence, that the damage could well have been done. The DDoS attack, which also hit Facebook and LiveJournal remember, which appeared to have been directed at keeping one vocal blogger off the InterWeb to quiet his political arguments, impacted on Twitter way harder than might be reasonably expected of such a popular service.
You might be forgiven for thinking that the social networking come microblogging site du jour would be able to repel borders with a little more techno-savvy vim and vigour, after all Facebook and Livejournal managed to do just that and were not suffering like Twitter for days.
If the hackers and botnet merchants don’t bring Twitter down then, at least according to a new Gartner report, general disillusionment might. In the wonderfully entitled ‘Hype Cycle Special Report 2009‘ which evaluates the maturity of 1,650 technologies and trends in 79 technology, topic and industry areas, Gartner argues that the Twitter explosion has meant that the “inevitable disillusionment around ‘channel pollution’ is beginning”. It’s not all bad news for Twitter though, Gartner reckons that once business gets past that period of disillusionment Twitter will probably find widespread acceptance as far as mainstream implementations are concerned.
Assuming the next big thing has not already come along to swallow it up by then, of course. And assuming that it can get past the ‘buy your followers here‘ and ‘celebrity obsessed‘ phases it is going through right now that is.
Tags: business, Opinion, Security, social networking, Twitter
Posted in: Just in, Rant, Real World Computing
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
One Response to “ Twitter goes down (again) but will it soon be counted out for good? ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement


August 13th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Have any outside folks ever done a reasonable audit of Twitter’s infrastructure, technology and so on? I remember about a year and a half ago, when Twitter was going down more often than a Bangkok “independent businesswoman”, there was a real shoutfest in some of the technical blogs that were looking askance at what Twitter had done to make Ruby on Rails scale kinda-sorta-enough. Numerous respected writers weighed in on all sides – those saying that Rails COULDN’T do what Twitter really needed to (in its current form, at least), others that Rails wasn’t the problem so much as Twitter’s implementation, and various other brushfires. Rails pseudodemigod DHH weighed in, having been described as berating the Twitter folks savagely for what they’d done to his ‘baby’.
Things died down after Twitter managed to stay up for more than a couple of days at a time, but the impression I had at the time was that there were still some very critical open questions about the entire architecture and infrastructure in the minds of (at least self-styled) experts.
I don’t know that a real audit could be done without spilling more of the Twit’s IP into the public arena than they’d reasonably be comfortable with. But I DO believe that, if it’s going to remain viable as a platform for other people to build on top of (and even sometimes sell to real, paying customers), that there needs to be several hecks of a lot more openly known than there seems to be now.