<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uninstalled software shouldn&#8217;t hijack your browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Melville</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-90901</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Melville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6154#comment-90901</guid>
		<description>Stop using Windows or stop whining about it -- I assume that the remark about Chrome was Chrome running under Windows.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop using Windows or stop whining about it &#8212; I assume that the remark about Chrome was Chrome running under Windows.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-90643</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6154#comment-90643</guid>
		<description>The two in this particular instance were WinZip and Orb. There are countless others employing the same tactics. 

Barry Collins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two in this particular instance were WinZip and Orb. There are countless others employing the same tactics. </p>
<p>Barry Collins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-90328</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6154#comment-90328</guid>
		<description>Was one of them Google Chrome, by any chance? &quot;Was it something we said?&quot; they ask. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was one of them Google Chrome, by any chance? &#8220;Was it something we said?&#8221; they ask. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-90310</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6154#comment-90310</guid>
		<description>I HATE this.  Almost as much as every single bit of software thinking that it needs to install another memory resident application to check for updates to itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HATE this.  Almost as much as every single bit of software thinking that it needs to install another memory resident application to check for updates to itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.infodude.net</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-90307</link>
		<dc:creator>www.infodude.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6154#comment-90307</guid>
		<description>I seen this problem happen too, so, I agree - name and shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seen this problem happen too, so, I agree &#8211; name and shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-90211</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6154#comment-90211</guid>
		<description>At the very least they should ASK you if you wish to visit their website to fill in an &#039;exit interview&#039;. My guess is that 99% of people will click &#039;no&#039;, which must be the same number that close the unrequested web page anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the very least they should ASK you if you wish to visit their website to fill in an &#8216;exit interview&#8217;. My guess is that 99% of people will click &#8216;no&#8217;, which must be the same number that close the unrequested web page anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-90208</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6154#comment-90208</guid>
		<description>I hate that too, although for the author of the software, it is nice to know why people are uninstalling...

I&#039;d be happy if the uninstaller asked if I had time / the desire to fill in a questionairre, but to arbitrarily redirect me to their website? Hmm, sounds like a good reason to be shot of the software.

Maybe naming-and-shaming such software would wake companies up to bad practices - perhaps include it in a review of the software, how well it uninstalls and whether it opens your browser and asks for an explanation...

That said, it isn&#039;t hijacking your browser, but don&#039;t let that get in the way of a provocative headline! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate that too, although for the author of the software, it is nice to know why people are uninstalling&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy if the uninstaller asked if I had time / the desire to fill in a questionairre, but to arbitrarily redirect me to their website? Hmm, sounds like a good reason to be shot of the software.</p>
<p>Maybe naming-and-shaming such software would wake companies up to bad practices &#8211; perhaps include it in a review of the software, how well it uninstalls and whether it opens your browser and asks for an explanation&#8230;</p>
<p>That said, it isn&#8217;t hijacking your browser, but don&#8217;t let that get in the way of a provocative headline! <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaoistTotty</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/07/uninstalled-software-shouldnt-hijack-your-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-90205</link>
		<dc:creator>TaoistTotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6154#comment-90205</guid>
		<description>This is one of my pet hates.

I have even had some that will not un-install if it cannot connect to the website (i.e. you are not on-line).

This is especially bad when it is an anti-virus (taken to a web page when you do not have any anti-virus).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of my pet hates.</p>
<p>I have even had some that will not un-install if it cannot connect to the website (i.e. you are not on-line).</p>
<p>This is especially bad when it is an anti-virus (taken to a web page when you do not have any anti-virus).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

