<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft goes mad with new IE8 ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:20:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: daddy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-96982</link>
		<dc:creator>daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-96982</guid>
		<description>hahaha all you firefox loving peeps...there is quite simply nothing wrong with ie7 or 8.  use firefox if you wish, personal preference but its not better...more customisable? yes, some would say customisable with crap....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha all you firefox loving peeps&#8230;there is quite simply nothing wrong with ie7 or 8.  use firefox if you wish, personal preference but its not better&#8230;more customisable? yes, some would say customisable with crap&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Office 2010 trailer kills Clippy &#124; PC Pro blog</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-91234</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Office 2010 trailer kills Clippy &#124; PC Pro blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-91234</guid>
		<description>[...] Internet Explorer 8 ads? They were just the beginning it turns out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet Explorer 8 ads? They were just the beginning it turns out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sara</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-90961</link>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-90961</guid>
		<description>Funny, but honestly I have a hard time taking these seriously. I&#039;m actually not thoroughly convinced they&#039;re the real deal, by which I mean, I&#039;m not sure whether these are Microsoft-produced ads meant to promote... well, anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, but honestly I have a hard time taking these seriously. I&#8217;m actually not thoroughly convinced they&#8217;re the real deal, by which I mean, I&#8217;m not sure whether these are Microsoft-produced ads meant to promote&#8230; well, anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-90946</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-90946</guid>
		<description>Kind of sad that you even need to advertise your browser like this to try and convince people to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of sad that you even need to advertise your browser like this to try and convince people to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeeow</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-90943</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-90943</guid>
		<description>It seems as though a lot of American commercials are going towards this strange humor of awkward commercials. I don&#039;t really like it, but that&#039;s just me. At least they&#039;re not as weird as those crazy Japanese commercials and shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems as though a lot of American commercials are going towards this strange humor of awkward commercials. I don&#8217;t really like it, but that&#8217;s just me. At least they&#8217;re not as weird as those crazy Japanese commercials and shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-90841</link>
		<dc:creator>John Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-90841</guid>
		<description>What SHEER UNADULTERATED KRAP!

These guys are living in their own world.

RIP Microsoft.

We hardly knew ye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What SHEER UNADULTERATED KRAP!</p>
<p>These guys are living in their own world.</p>
<p>RIP Microsoft.</p>
<p>We hardly knew ye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-90793</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-90793</guid>
		<description>Mildly amusing. I get the impression that MS are like a group of exploratory teens. Trying to copy ideas here without understanding that there is a difference between laughing with and laughing at things. These are mildly amusing (like the sharing one), but sorry, they simply do not get it. Don&#039;t try to copy Apple&#039;s approach without engaging brains. (Or design software for that matter... without engaging intelligence)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mildly amusing. I get the impression that MS are like a group of exploratory teens. Trying to copy ideas here without understanding that there is a difference between laughing with and laughing at things. These are mildly amusing (like the sharing one), but sorry, they simply do not get it. Don&#8217;t try to copy Apple&#8217;s approach without engaging brains. (Or design software for that matter&#8230; without engaging intelligence)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-90322</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-90322</guid>
		<description>Truely awful ads, does someone at the agency think they are witty or cool?

Grim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truely awful ads, does someone at the agency think they are witty or cool?</p>
<p>Grim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-90061</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-90061</guid>
		<description>@Ken Bundy - sorry Ken, I was assuming too much. I thought you might at least be competant enough to understand the secunia website. Obviously not. The Binary Analysis section contains the results of the vulnerabilities that have been analysed by the Secunia team to establish a binary signature, mainly for use in AV programs. This is not the same as their vulnerabilities tracking database.

Have a look at the Vulnerabilities By Product section, specifically under Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.x and Mozilla Firefox 3.0.x. Not quite what you expected to see, I bet ;-))

So, I say again,  DO Ignore comments from Ken Bundy making claims without offering 
any facts to back them up !!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ken Bundy &#8211; sorry Ken, I was assuming too much. I thought you might at least be competant enough to understand the secunia website. Obviously not. The Binary Analysis section contains the results of the vulnerabilities that have been analysed by the Secunia team to establish a binary signature, mainly for use in AV programs. This is not the same as their vulnerabilities tracking database.</p>
<p>Have a look at the Vulnerabilities By Product section, specifically under Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.x and Mozilla Firefox 3.0.x. Not quite what you expected to see, I bet <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>So, I say again,  DO Ignore comments from Ken Bundy making claims without offering<br />
any facts to back them up !!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Bundy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/02/microsoft-goes-mad-with-new-ie8-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-90037</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Bundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6133#comment-90037</guid>
		<description>@Richard: Thankyou so much for telling us all about the secunia.com website. Their &quot;Binary Analysis Archive&quot; shows two hits when using the search term &quot;firefox&quot; and 20 hits when using the search term &quot;explorer&quot;!

So, I say again, avoid Internet Explorer 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard: Thankyou so much for telling us all about the secunia.com website. Their &#8220;Binary Analysis Archive&#8221; shows two hits when using the search term &#8220;firefox&#8221; and 20 hits when using the search term &#8220;explorer&#8221;!</p>
<p>So, I say again, avoid Internet Explorer 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
