<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.5 arrives &#8211; but without Google Gears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fabrixx</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-89239</link>
		<dc:creator>fabrixx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6082#comment-89239</guid>
		<description>please update, i need for my wordpress blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please update, i need for my wordpress blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-88948</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6082#comment-88948</guid>
		<description>@HenrikB Don&#039;t you get the Gold code prior to release?

It&#039;s an issue I have with Firefox as a whole.  I&#039;ve considered using it as my main browser now that I&#039;ve found add-ins that provide the functionality of IE7 for IE, but 4 have been disabled having upgraded to 3.5.  I&#039;m seriously considering rolling back as it hurts my browsing experience too much, at least until compatibility issues have been sorted out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HenrikB Don&#8217;t you get the Gold code prior to release?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an issue I have with Firefox as a whole.  I&#8217;ve considered using it as my main browser now that I&#8217;ve found add-ins that provide the functionality of IE7 for IE, but 4 have been disabled having upgraded to 3.5.  I&#8217;m seriously considering rolling back as it hurts my browsing experience too much, at least until compatibility issues have been sorted out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-88501</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6082#comment-88501</guid>
		<description>&quot;Seroiusly?
“The first cracks”
give me a break. Find some real journalism skills&quot;


Maybe you should find a spell checker before ranting at journalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Seroiusly?<br />
“The first cracks”<br />
give me a break. Find some real journalism skills&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe you should find a spell checker before ranting at journalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-88426</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6082#comment-88426</guid>
		<description>This is clearly google gear&#039;s developers lazyness: some other google plugins have already been released and are working perfectly fine with 3.5 (such as the google toolbar). 

As for making a new build &quot;anytime a new RC is released&quot; I don&#039;t see the issue - this is called software engineering. When Firefox represents such a strategical platform for Google, producing a handful of bulids over such a large timeline (the Firefox 3.5 RC release cycle was very large) was trivial.

In the grand scheme, this is not a big deal, but explaining the absence of this plugin by such theories is just BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is clearly google gear&#8217;s developers lazyness: some other google plugins have already been released and are working perfectly fine with 3.5 (such as the google toolbar). </p>
<p>As for making a new build &#8220;anytime a new RC is released&#8221; I don&#8217;t see the issue &#8211; this is called software engineering. When Firefox represents such a strategical platform for Google, producing a handful of bulids over such a large timeline (the Firefox 3.5 RC release cycle was very large) was trivial.</p>
<p>In the grand scheme, this is not a big deal, but explaining the absence of this plugin by such theories is just BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-88387</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6082#comment-88387</guid>
		<description>Seroiusly?

&quot;The first cracks&quot;

give me a break. Find some real journalism skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seroiusly?</p>
<p>&#8220;The first cracks&#8221;</p>
<p>give me a break. Find some real journalism skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dpalay</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-88285</link>
		<dc:creator>Dpalay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6082#comment-88285</guid>
		<description>To note:  
Google had the same pattern when Firefox 3.0 was released.  They generally release gears a few days/weeks after the official release.  
Hardly what I would call the &quot;... first sign that cracks are beginning to appear in the once harmonious Google/Mozilla relationship ...&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To note:<br />
Google had the same pattern when Firefox 3.0 was released.  They generally release gears a few days/weeks after the official release.<br />
Hardly what I would call the &#8220;&#8230; first sign that cracks are beginning to appear in the once harmonious Google/Mozilla relationship &#8230;&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PetieG</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-88276</link>
		<dc:creator>PetieG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6082#comment-88276</guid>
		<description>Please make it soon!!  tia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please make it soon!!  tia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HenrikB</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/firefox-35-arrives-but-without-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-88273</link>
		<dc:creator>HenrikB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6082#comment-88273</guid>
		<description>FYI:


We&#039;re working on pushing out a new Gears version that support FF 3.5.

We typically wait until the official &quot;gold&quot; release of Firefox is
pushed, because otherwise, we keep having to do new builds everytime a
new RC is pushed.

- a (Google) 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI:</p>
<p>We&#8217;re working on pushing out a new Gears version that support FF 3.5.</p>
<p>We typically wait until the official &#8220;gold&#8221; release of Firefox is<br />
pushed, because otherwise, we keep having to do new builds everytime a<br />
new RC is pushed.</p>
<p>- a (Google)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
