Posted on May 20th, 2009 by Jon Honeyball
Microsoft attempts to clean up its cloud
You may have read my not-terribly-polite post about the astonishing restrictions found inside Microsoft’s terms and conditions for its hosted services. Well here’s the follow-up.
Because yesterday, I (and a couple of colleagues) had an hour-long “full and frank exchange of views” with four senior Microsoft Redmond people responsible for the hosted services offering: Eron Kelly, Senior Director, Microsoft Online Services; Kore Kourbourlis, Senior Director, Compliance and Privacy; Brendon Lynch, Director, Trustworthy Computing; and Mike Ziock, Senior Director of Operations, Business Online Services.
We went through our concerns regarding data movement, implications for data protection issues under EU law, SLA, the sign-up process, terms & conditions and so forth.
The discussion was productive and Microsoft, you may be surprised to hear, thanked us for raising these issues.
There is one update of particular importance – Mike Ziock, who runs the operations side of the hosted services, stated that your data is held in Dublin (in a redundant failover fashion) and is backed up to Amsterdam. And that under no circumstances would it leave the EU.
There is a concern surrounding the routing of email through the Microsoft cloud which means that it might traverse through Microsoft’s datacenters before passing into the normal internet in the USA (for example) but it was agreed that mail routing and spam filtering was accepted as a necessary part of information flow, and was not to be confused with the bigger and much more important issue of the geolocalition of core company data.
We asked when we would see an updated set of Terms & Conditions which reflected these new claims. They were not able to give a solid timeline for this.
So despite the assurances given yesterday, our concerns regarding data movement etc still stand – Microsoft needs to do much work to clarify and simplify the T&Cs such that they are both relevant to the UK/EU marketplace and are binding here.
It would be very disappointing if MS did nothing until the next wave of technology hosting, which will be the public release of Azure cloud services later in the year. As it stands, we have sets of T&Cs and other documentation which are simply contradictory in what they state, and this is not acceptable.
Obviously I will update as soon as we hear something concrete and binding from Microsoft, but for now the message is clear: improving, listening too, but must try harder.
Tags: azure, cloud computing, Microsoft
Posted in: Real World Computing
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
5 Responses to “ Microsoft attempts to clean up its cloud ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk





























May 20th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Makes you wonder- does MS actually understand the cloud yet and what it means??
May 20th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
Just been at a BPOS partner briefing today…
The word regarding DPA we go was different today
Absolutely no guarantees it won’t leave the EU…
And they wont guarantee it until there is a test case against it…
May 21st, 2009 at 8:17 am
Tried to DM you but can’t…
It was just to let you know that I was at Daresbury Innovation Park in Warrington for our regional MS Partner brief… It was Simon Palmer who said about the test case, and Theodore Shultz doing the presentation…
May 21st, 2009 at 8:23 am
Update — just checked the exchange SLA document (one of a cloud of docs that we have had). Its 10 hours per year of scheduled downtime, not 10 hours per month. Apologies for error.
My only excuse is the difficulty in *finding* these documents and the various versions of them we have had.
May 22nd, 2009 at 8:58 am
Stanley,
I don’t think any Cloud providers, at least none of the major ones I’ve read about, get the “Cloud” when it comes to local restrictions on data movement, data protection and legal jurisdiction.
They seem to do a Sheriff Buford T. Justice, when it comes to legalities:
“Don’t give me none of that jurisdiction cr*p”…