Posted on May 13th, 2009 by Jon Honeyball
Some very good reasons not to choose a Microsoft hosted service
It’s amazing what you find when you read the Terms and Conditions.
Go to this page on the Microsoft downloads area and then download the file which is the Exchange Hosted Services Service Level Agreement document.
Scroll down to the bottom, and you will find what Microsoft will pay you if they fall foul of the SLA.
Basically, they will give you “Service Credits” for downtime, and at no point will the Credit exceed the value of what you pay Microsoft for the month of service provision.
Now look at the percentages: to get 100% of your money back, Microsoft has to fail a 95% SLA.
For the sake of easy Maths, let’s assume there are 30 days in a month, which equals 720 hours. 95% uptime is 36 hours over the entire month. 36 hours is 4.5 working days of downtime, assuming an 8-hour work day.
So the most you can get back from Microsoft only kicks in when you have had your hosted exchange server down for almost one week in four, assuming all the unexpected downtime happens within your working day. Hardly generous, is it?
But there’s more: “Scheduled downtime” is excluded from this rebate scheme until it exceeds another 10 hours per calendar month.
Quite apart from this, the document is a wonderful example of legalese and obfuscation. How about this part:
“‘Monthly Uptime Percentage’ for a specific Customer is calculated by taking the total number of minutes in a calendar month multiplied by the total number of licensed users minus the total number of minutes of Downtime experienced by all users in a given calendar month, all divided by the total number of minutes in that calendar month multiplied by the total number of users.”
Well that’s perfectly clear then.
By the way, it’s the same terms for the hosted SharePoint and hosted Live Meeting too. And of course, there is no link between these SLAs either, as far as I can see.
Tags: exchange, hosted services, Microsoft, sla
Posted in: Random
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
4 Responses to “ Some very good reasons not to choose a Microsoft hosted service ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk





























May 14th, 2009 at 10:11 am
Surely 95% uptime equates to 684 hours from a max of 720 hours and not 36 hours?
Maybe I’m just reading it wrong.
May 14th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
he meant that 95% uptime = 36 hours down time.
May 18th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
it is first time I see SLA measured as “working days”, maybe still some guys work for 8 hours a day BTW a 95% means 1 and a half day for having a 100% credit…. well if it is the only reason to not chose MS Online services that is not enough
May 20th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
[...] may have read my not-terribly-polite post about the astonishing restrictions found inside Microsoft’s terms and conditions for its hosted services. Well here’s the [...]