<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 GDI performance: the trade-off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Italian Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/comment-page-1/#comment-59701</link>
		<dc:creator>Italian Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5528#comment-59701</guid>
		<description>Hi, I think that the reasoning is not much correct. With the new GDI model of WDDM 1.1 there will be a slowdown only when the CPU has to read back from the GPU vram. This case is very rare in normal applications. Why you would read back from video memory? Usually you want only to draw something on the screen. And if you want to elaborate some pixels already displayed on video, usually you leave this task to the GPU itself (and this is what should do WDDM 1.1), because the GPU can work at full speed with its vram.
So, I think that if an application, today, works faster with Vista WDDM 1.0 drivers, it is only because the Win7 WDDM1.1 drivers are not mature yet. Or maybe new applications have to use new WDDM1.1 api to take advantage of its GPU accelerated functions.
Sorry for my bad english.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I think that the reasoning is not much correct. With the new GDI model of WDDM 1.1 there will be a slowdown only when the CPU has to read back from the GPU vram. This case is very rare in normal applications. Why you would read back from video memory? Usually you want only to draw something on the screen. And if you want to elaborate some pixels already displayed on video, usually you leave this task to the GPU itself (and this is what should do WDDM 1.1), because the GPU can work at full speed with its vram.<br />
So, I think that if an application, today, works faster with Vista WDDM 1.0 drivers, it is only because the Win7 WDDM1.1 drivers are not mature yet. Or maybe new applications have to use new WDDM1.1 api to take advantage of its GPU accelerated functions.<br />
Sorry for my bad english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darien Graham-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/comment-page-1/#comment-58407</link>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5528#comment-58407</guid>
		<description>Yuri: These are the standard PC Pro real world benchmarks, which use Office 2003. I&#039;m afraid we can&#039;t distribute them as they&#039;re built on commercial code from multiple vendors... but if you&#039;re interested you can find more details in the &quot;Real World Benchmarks&quot; section of any PC Pro cover disc. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuri: These are the standard PC Pro real world benchmarks, which use Office 2003. I&#8217;m afraid we can&#8217;t distribute them as they&#8217;re built on commercial code from multiple vendors&#8230; but if you&#8217;re interested you can find more details in the &#8220;Real World Benchmarks&#8221; section of any PC Pro cover disc. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W7: problemas con drivers GDI &#171; Tecnologia, Actualidad,y mucho mas&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/comment-page-1/#comment-57794</link>
		<dc:creator>W7: problemas con drivers GDI &#171; Tecnologia, Actualidad,y mucho mas&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5528#comment-57794</guid>
		<description>[...] PCPro nos llega el resultado de unas pruebas de rendimiento que competen a la nueva versión de Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PCPro nos llega el resultado de unas pruebas de rendimiento que competen a la nueva versión de Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/comment-page-1/#comment-57774</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5528#comment-57774</guid>
		<description>Darien, where can I install the benchmark from? Which version of office does it use?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darien, where can I install the benchmark from? Which version of office does it use?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/comment-page-1/#comment-57740</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5528#comment-57740</guid>
		<description>Good work Darien, very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work Darien, very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaoistTotty</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/comment-page-1/#comment-57728</link>
		<dc:creator>TaoistTotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5528#comment-57728</guid>
		<description>This is interesting and it could be the beta drives as muck mentions.

Are you planning on testing this with CAD and/or Photoshop etc. as this would be interesting to see and could cause bigger problems)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting and it could be the beta drives as muck mentions.</p>
<p>Are you planning on testing this with CAD and/or Photoshop etc. as this would be interesting to see and could cause bigger problems)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muck</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/07/windows-7-gdi-performance-the-big-trade-off/comment-page-1/#comment-57723</link>
		<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5528#comment-57723</guid>
		<description>Surely the ATI Win 7 drivers are in beta. I use Nvidia drivers and I know they stick the beta tag to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the ATI Win 7 drivers are in beta. I use Nvidia drivers and I know they stick the beta tag to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
