Posted on May 7th, 2009 by Mike Jennings
The £250 Challenge: the victor speaks
So, the votes have been counted, analysed and re-counted, and the results are in: my cobbled-together self-build PC has won the £250 Challenge.
I spent the entirety of the building and voting period enthusiastically claiming that a self-built PC was the only one worth choosing thanks to its mix of decent components and effervescent, charming personality.
In practice, though, that meant that my PC ran Ubuntu and the beta version of Windows 7 rather than a proper, paid-for OS, had cables trailing around the case and a decent selection of ports and sockets on the front that didn’t actually work.
And then there was the case, which looked like the next Transformers movie if Michael Bay’s budget was reduced to nothing and sounded like a vacuum cleaner echoing around the Grand Canyon.
But, when stacked up against the competition, the Warrior 250PCWGFS fought valiantly and earned more votes than anyone else.
So my first thanks my go to the readers – those who voted for my self-build PC and those who made helpful suggestions along the way. Grimer, Allan Simpson, Claave, Nathan, Lex, Nick, Ian Devlin, Peter Tennant, pcernie, technogeist and the enigmatically-named E: I owe you a pint after you all pointed me in the right direction and helped me avoid the many pitfalls associated with building a prize-winning PC for such a low price.
I also need to thank the rest of the team for providing such varied competition: Darien’s second-hand bundle was a genuine threat, but Bayon’s PC – which exuded all the excitement and personality of Swine Flu – didn’t exactly cause me sleepless nights.
The various suppliers deserve gratitude, too: Scan.co.uk, Micro Direct and especially Ebuyer, where I qualified for free delivery and managed to eke a few more quid out of my budget.
I realise that this speech is going on a bit, though, and I’ll start getting weepy in a minute – so I’ll end with a suggestion to the lucky reader who will eventually claim my PC as their own: it may be called the Warrior, but be gentle with her.
And I’m not claiming any responsibility when the CPU melts or the case decides to spontaneously combust.
7 Responses to “ The £250 Challenge: the victor speaks ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement



May 7th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
“rather than a proper, paid-for OS”?!?
If you think that a paid-for OS is the only “proper” one then you shouldn’t be writing for an IT magazine.
May 7th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
Well done! I’m glad you won.
May 7th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
Grimer – thanks! You were a great help throughout the process.
Stefanos – of course I don’t think that a paid-for OS is the only worthwhile one; I’ve got Ubuntu on my laptop, for instance. However, every other machine here came with Vista or XP pre-installed and, in the case of Dave Bayon’s machine, brand-new. In that situation, I think that the average buyer would rather pick that than Linux or a test version of Windows 7 and, in a reviewing situation, having a legitimate paid-for OS is a definite advantage.
May 7th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Read that paragraph of your article again. Tell me how do you understand the wording “Ubuntu and the beta version of Windows 7 rather than a proper, paid-for OS” or in your reply “having a legitimate paid-for OS is a definite advantage”. How is it possible to list a non-paid for OS as a disadvantage in a £250 build-off competition?!? Where in most cases £250 would only buy you a license for a paid-for OS without leaving with much to spare for anything else. I am not saying that the non-paid for is better or vice versa. I use best of both worlds but if an open source operatiing system does not have a place or is considered a disadvantage in a £250 computer then I don’t know what does….
But then again what do I know about computers… I just run a network with 400+ clients with a mixture of “proper” and “non-proper” OSes and 20 servers with mostly “non-proper” OSes installed on them….
Can someone please enlighten me as to what a “proper” OS is?
May 7th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
I love the “Curry’s-style” warranty that comes with it…
” I’m not claiming any responsibility when the CPU melts or the case decides to spontaneously combust”
May 7th, 2009 at 8:15 pm
Ubuntu is a stable, mature, rich operating system that has none of the ‘illnesses’ of MS Windows (viruses, trojans, botnets, etc.).
Mike Jennings, the wording in your comment “in a reviewing situation, having a legitimate paid-for OS is a definite advantage” is unfortunate because it implies that a non-paid OS is not legitimate. This could not be further from the truth.
May 8th, 2009 at 8:37 am
I admit that maybe using the word ‘proper’ in this context wasn’t entirely accurate.
Also, as Daniel points out with his comment about my ‘Curry’s-style’ warranty, that certain parts of this post should be taken with tongue firmly in cheek :p
Mike