Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on May 7th, 2009 by Mike Jennings

The £250 Challenge: the victor speaks

The victorious self-build PC So, the votes have been counted, analysed and re-counted, and the results are in: my cobbled-together self-build PC has won the £250 Challenge.

I spent the entirety of the building and voting period enthusiastically claiming that a self-built PC was the only one worth choosing thanks to its mix of decent components and effervescent, charming personality.

In practice, though, that meant that my PC ran Ubuntu and the beta version of Windows 7 rather than a proper, paid-for OS, had cables trailing around the case and a decent selection of ports and sockets on the front that didn’t actually work.

And then there was the case, which looked like the next Transformers movie if Michael Bay’s budget was reduced to nothing and sounded like a vacuum cleaner echoing around the Grand Canyon.

But, when stacked up against the competition, the Warrior 250PCWGFS fought valiantly and earned more votes than anyone else.

So my first thanks my go to the readers – those who voted for my self-build PC and those who made helpful suggestions along the way. Grimer, Allan Simpson, Claave, Nathan, Lex, Nick, Ian Devlin, Peter Tennant, pcernie, technogeist and the enigmatically-named E: I owe you a pint after you all pointed me in the right direction and helped me avoid the many pitfalls associated with building a prize-winning PC for such a low price.

I also need to thank the rest of the team for providing such varied competition: Darien’s second-hand bundle was a genuine threat, but Bayon’s PC – which exuded all the excitement and personality of Swine Flu – didn’t exactly cause me sleepless nights.

Would you have bet against a machine that looked like this?

The various suppliers deserve gratitude, too: Scan.co.uk, Micro Direct and especially Ebuyer, where I qualified for free delivery and managed to eke a few more quid out of my budget.

I realise that this speech is going on a bit, though, and I’ll start getting weepy in a minute – so I’ll end with a suggestion to the lucky reader who will eventually claim my PC as their own: it may be called the Warrior, but be gentle with her.

And I’m not claiming any responsibility when the CPU melts or the case decides to spontaneously combust.

Tags:

Posted in: Random

Permalink | Trackback

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

7 Responses to “ The £250 Challenge: the victor speaks ”

  1. Stefanos Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    “rather than a proper, paid-for OS”?!?
    If you think that a paid-for OS is the only “proper” one then you shouldn’t be writing for an IT magazine.

     
  2. Grimer Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    Well done! I’m glad you won.

     
  3. Mike Jennings Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    Grimer – thanks! You were a great help throughout the process.

    Stefanos – of course I don’t think that a paid-for OS is the only worthwhile one; I’ve got Ubuntu on my laptop, for instance. However, every other machine here came with Vista or XP pre-installed and, in the case of Dave Bayon’s machine, brand-new. In that situation, I think that the average buyer would rather pick that than Linux or a test version of Windows 7 and, in a reviewing situation, having a legitimate paid-for OS is a definite advantage.

     
  4. Stefanos Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    Read that paragraph of your article again. Tell me how do you understand the wording “Ubuntu and the beta version of Windows 7 rather than a proper, paid-for OS” or in your reply “having a legitimate paid-for OS is a definite advantage”. How is it possible to list a non-paid for OS as a disadvantage in a £250 build-off competition?!? Where in most cases £250 would only buy you a license for a paid-for OS without leaving with much to spare for anything else. I am not saying that the non-paid for is better or vice versa. I use best of both worlds but if an open source operatiing system does not have a place or is considered a disadvantage in a £250 computer then I don’t know what does….

    But then again what do I know about computers… I just run a network with 400+ clients with a mixture of “proper” and “non-proper” OSes and 20 servers with mostly “non-proper” OSes installed on them….

    Can someone please enlighten me as to what a “proper” OS is?

     
  5. Daniel Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    I love the “Curry’s-style” warranty that comes with it…

    ” I’m not claiming any responsibility when the CPU melts or the case decides to spontaneously combust”

     
  6. Elmer Says:
    May 7th, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    Ubuntu is a stable, mature, rich operating system that has none of the ‘illnesses’ of MS Windows (viruses, trojans, botnets, etc.).

    Mike Jennings, the wording in your comment “in a reviewing situation, having a legitimate paid-for OS is a definite advantage” is unfortunate because it implies that a non-paid OS is not legitimate. This could not be further from the truth.

     
  7. Mike Jennings Says:
    May 8th, 2009 at 8:37 am

    I admit that maybe using the word ‘proper’ in this context wasn’t entirely accurate.

    Also, as Daniel points out with his comment about my ‘Curry’s-style’ warranty, that certain parts of this post should be taken with tongue firmly in cheek :p

    Mike

     

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

* required fields

* Will not be published

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010