Posted on May 5th, 2009 by Barry Collins
Windows 7 Release Candidate: start from scratch or upgrade the beta?
If you’re one of the millions currently downloading Windows 7 RC, you’re very soon (well, I say very soon – if our experience is anything to go by, you might have completed the download by Thursday week) going to be presented with a dilemma: Perform a clean install or hack the OS and upgrade in place over the beta.
Microsoft’s installation instructions tell a little white lie. “If you’ve installed Windows 7 Beta on your PC, you’ll need to back up your data, and do a clean installation of the RC,” they claim. Not true. That might be what Microsoft wants you to do, but it is perfectly possible to upgrade your beta by following the instructions provided on Microsoft’s own Engineering Windows 7 blog.
Microsoft doesn’t want you to do this, of course, and for perfectly valid reasons. In the real world, when Windows 7 is finally released, few people are going to be upgrading from one version of Windows 7 to another. It wants as many people as possible testing the upgrade process from Vista, not discovering and reporting bugs from one build to another.
However, if like me and our editor Tim Danton, you simply can’t be bothered to reinstall all your apps, you can upgrade in place by hacking the version number of the RC before attempting an installation (click on the Engineering Windows 7 link above for full step-by-step instructions).
Originally I thought upgrading in place would be a time-saver. No need to dig out the Office discs, re-download Firefox, configure UAC to my liking etc. However, the upgrade took over an hour-and-a-half compared to the 20 minutes or so it took my colleagues to do a clean install, wiping out the smug notion of efficiency I was harbouring.
What’s more (and this is only anecdotal evidence so far), Windows 7 seems to run a smidgin slower on the upgraded machines. Start-up and shut-downs seem a few seconds more sluggish, it doesn’t spring into life the instant you enter the admin password, and there’s the odd graphical slowdown with the Aero interface. It’s nothing to scare the chickens, but just enough for us upgraders to come in this morning and ask “does it feel a bit slower to you?”.
So does upgrading in place work? Yes. Would we recommend it? Probably not. On this occasion, it might just be better to do as Microsoft tells you.
Tags: beta, installation, Release Candidate, Windows 7
Posted in: Windows 7
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
6 Responses to “ Windows 7 Release Candidate: start from scratch or upgrade the beta? ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk




























May 5th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Donloaded it this morning – did it quite quickly too.
Did a clean install on a virtual machine (using Microsoft’s own Virtual PC). Installed the ‘additions’ (which integrate it with the host OS), rebooted and it immediately blue-screened. Not a good start!
May 6th, 2009 at 7:52 am
Downloaded it yesterday (Tuesday 5th) at 13:30 – took around 15 mins on our line (30 MB education) no problem.
Haven’t installed it yet, but will be doing a clean install on my Samsung NC10 rather than upgrading the beta – only a couple of programs to stick back on. Will also do a clean install on my main machine (currently Vista Home Premium), as it could do with a clean-out anyways and even following every Google-provided solution to the large-file-copying problem, my PC still crashes out when copying anything more than a gig. Which makes using it as a Media Centre somewhat laughable…
May 7th, 2009 at 8:47 am
I downloaded Windows 7 x64 RC from MSDN Downloads last Thursday and installed it under VMWare Fusion on my MacbookPro. I installed VS2008 + SP1 (it wouldn’t install SQL Server 2005, but I don’t really care), Office 2007, various other apps (Google Chrome, Beyond Compare, e text-editor, Git, TortoiseGit, 7-zip, GnuWin32, Visual Assist and Avast).
No problems aside from the SQL Server one and also I needed the Google Chrome beta release (as opposed to the stable release) for some reason (I didn’t with Windows 7 beta, but I used the 32-bit version of that – might make the difference), Microsoft Update’s done its thing happily enough and I’ve stuck with the Windows 7 betta fish background, despite the various psychedelic options Microsoft have added in the RC(!).
Overall, I’m a happy camper
May 7th, 2009 at 8:04 pm
I installed Windows 7 RC2 over Vista Home Premium. I don’t know bow long it took because I went to bed but the result is quite stunnning.
The machine (Medion Laptop,Pentium Dual T3290, 3Gb) is alive at last. Near instantaneous desktop from password input, all services up and running including the wireless networking which was patchy to say the least under Vista, and a general feeling of speed and smoothness.
All original apps are running well including XP and Ubuntu under Virtual PC.
I’ve only had it on for two days but I’m already sold. If you’re prepared to wipe and regress (or spend) next year, I’d say that you should give it a go.
Jeff
May 9th, 2009 at 9:21 am
Installed win 7 64x rc1 as a clean install…as with beta found nothing I couldnt sort. One driver was only issue in beta for ATI graphics card…which was resolved with patch. So far nothing has changed. Have Microsoft FINALLY got it 100% right? To be fair I didnt have any significant problems with Vista or Vista 64x, though 7 is faster. A lot of problem were caused by 3rd party software companies not intergrating with Vista and Microsoft rushing the exercise instead of ignoring the demand and getting it right first time. The tester is how long after final release will they need to bring out a service pack?
Good Luck Microsoft lets hope users wont scream to go back to XP!!!
July 16th, 2009 at 12:41 pm
[...] will be quicker as you don’t need to re-install all your applications and data files, but as PC Pro found, the actual upgrade takes a lot longer anyway, so you don’t save that much on time [...]