Posted on April 23rd, 2009 by Barry Collins
The Government’s giving up on rural fibre broadband
Chancellor Alistair Darling’s pledge of £250m to help Britain achieve universal broadband might sound like progress – but it’s practically an admission that rural areas will never get high-speed fibre connections.
The amount of money on the table is derisory. BT is spending £1.5 billion on bringing fibre-to-the-cabinet to 10 million homes across the country, and BT is (so far) concentrating on urban areas where deployment costs are lower. Does the Government really think it can bring even 2Mbit/sec broadband to the whole of Britain on a sixth of the budget?
Actually, no, it doesn’t. The Chancellor’s woolly Budget report claims that “If necessary, the cost would also be met through additional funding mechanisms, as set out in the Digital Britain Interim Report.” In other words, fixed and mobile broadband providers will be expected to foot the bill. But as Communications Minister Lord Carter told The Telegraph earlier this week, “there will certainly be 25-30% of the country where there will be no economic case for building a next-generation fixed network”.
While the unambitious target of 2Mbits/sec is hardly the “next-generation” network Carter refers to, it’s clear that the Government has already given up on high-speed networks in rural areas, and will settle for connection speeds that aren’t even fast enough to run the HD streams from the BBC iPlayer in vast chunks of the country.
Is that really a massive problem? It most certainly is, because as Carter concedes in that same Telegraph interview “in less than 10 years, we will be in a complete ‘on demand’ television world.” Except for those who haven’t got the broadband speeds to cope, of course.
“Lord Carter talks of a video-centric world,” argues Henry Aubrey-Fletcher, president of the Country Land and Business Association. “In reality we have a world where social and economic deprivation is growing because of a lack of access to fast internet connections.
“The economy is being divided because many rural businesses simply cannot compete with their urban rivals. School classes are split because of some children’s inability to do set homework online. Communities are being divided because people are seeking to move to a home that has broadband.”
Digital Britain? Only if you live in the right parts of it.
Tags: broadband, Digital Britain, fibre, Lord Carter, rural
Posted in: Newsdesk
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
2 Responses to “ The Government’s giving up on rural fibre broadband ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk




























August 31st, 2009 at 3:21 pm
I wonder if the government is aware that it may be in liable under european law if it does not provide a means of access to high speed broadband. The human rights legislation and the directive on the movement of goods and services include internet services. and the right to choose a satellite service is left mostly with the user. The goverment must seek to provide satellite internet providers with the means to compete with high speed providers in rural areas based on the speed of connection rather than the area even if rural broadband speeds outstrip urban broadband speeds. of course if the satellite dishes were, of sufficient size and strategically placed across the country and local users were connected to them by fibre optic a broadband network could be established without having to dig up the roads or lay cables from john o’ groats to lands end.
September 15th, 2009 at 10:31 am
Unfortunatly Satellite just isn’t fast enough and the expense is vast. WISP is a far more better solution for rural areas. Satellite still has its place as it can go anywhere, but for people in a area covered by a WISP they can get a fast connection (even leased). Check out http://www.fastruralbroadband.co.uk for a soultion in the East of England