Posted on April 20th, 2009 by Barry Collins
Google Profiles – a spammer’s dream?
Amid all the rumours about Google buying Twitter, it appears the search giant has been quietly refining its own social-networking arsenal. The company’s “official” social network, Orkut, has been largely ignored to death. However, the company has another trick up its sleeve – Google Profiles.
This is essentially a stripped-down Facebook-style profile page, which allows you to share photos (from Flickr or Picasa), videos (YouTube), web links (to your Facebook and Twitter profiles, for example) and the usual biographical gubbins. However, perhaps its most useful feature – which was only added last week – is the option to create vanity URLs. This means that, unlike Facebook, you can create a profile with a memorable web address, such as http://www.google.com/profiles/barrycollins.
However, there’s one sizeable fly in the ointment. If you sign in with your Google account, your Gmail username is automatically selected as your vanity URL. That means anyone who searches for your name – including spammers – will instantly have your Gmail address. The only other option is to choose what looks like a randomly generated string of numbers (i.e. http://www.google.com/profiles/10279475784) as your URL, which completely defeats the object of vanity URLs.
If you don’t have a Gmail account, however, you’re free to choose whichever URL you like. So Google is effectively punishing Gmail users, by practically forcing them to use a URL that gives away their email address.
It’s turned what could have been a pretty useful feature into something that I won’t be touching with a barge pole. Let’s hope Google sees sense, and gives its loyal Gmail users the chance to mask their email addresses with something a little friendlier than a string of digits.
Tags: Google Profiles, Orkut
Posted in: Newsdesk
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
One Response to “ Google Profiles – a spammer’s dream? ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement


May 3rd, 2009 at 7:20 am
Well said. I was having second thoughts about whether or not to proceed, once I found the gmail username would be part of the profile link. I’m glad somebody actually brought this up, and that I’m not too overly sceptic about the whole ’spamming’ thing. However, it’s understandable why Gmail would prefer a unique acc to separate the links from each other, other than a string of numbers.
The concept is good, just need a little tweak for the gmail clients’ benefits.
@wchingya
Social media/Blogging