Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on April 2nd, 2009 by Mike Jennings

Why I’ll miss Microsoft Encarta

I can’t help but feel that the closure of Microsoft Encarta is the end of an era. Website and service closures will surely become even more commonplace now that we’re in the midst of a recession – Microsoft itself has already closed ACES Game Studio, which had made the seminal Flight Simulator series since 1988, as well as Ensemble, which crafted the classic Age of Empires series and, more recently, Halo Wars.

The closure of Encarta may resonate on a more scholarly level – or, more likely, on a much smaller level altogether – then a couple of still-relevant games studios but, even though I haven’t used Encarta in the best part of a decade, I’ll still miss it.

That’s because before Wikipedia came along and obliterated the competition, Encarta was my encyclopaedia of choice, guiding me through homework and school assignments too numerous to count.

My first encounter with Encarta must have been similar to thousands of others’ – at school. It was installed on one machine, in the library, and was my first choice if I needed to do any research. I’d eagerly scorn the thousands of books in favour of tapping away on the whizzy new computer, which looked much like Stu’s Goodwill PC but only took fifteen minutes to boot.

I also quickly became addicted to MindMaze – the medieval-themed castle game where you progressed through the stone walls by answering general knowledge questions. Looking back, it’s worrying to think how many hours I wasted trying to explore a fictional castle but, at the time, it almost felt like the future.

On a more technical level, Encarta was a showcase for the PC, using its graphics and sound cards to full effect: the inclusion of videos and animated diagrams allowed for greater exploration of subjects as well as showing off your 3DFX Voodoo GPU, and the numerous audio clips – of music, word pronunciations and more – felt revolutionary, and I remember listening to as many clips as I could because it seemed such a novelty at the time.

Microsoft must have found it incredibly difficult to justify Encarta’s existence in 2009, though. Encarta may be written and compiled by experts, but its 42,000 articles doesn’t compare favourably with Wikipedia’s 2.7 million, even if those are written by volunteer contributors. Lacklustre updating didn’t help, either, with some articles laying fallow and lacking necessary updates for years; Wikipedia, on the other hand, is updated within minutes of a situation changing.

In the face of such competition and in the current climate, it’s easy to see why Microsoft felt compelled to pull the plug on Encarta. Wikipedia may be the new one-stop-shop for knowledge and it may offer, ultimately, more than Encarta ever did, but I doubt I’ll ever feel as fondly towards it as I always will do for the oft-maligned Encarta.

P.S. Also, if anyone has found an online recreation of MindMaze, please let me know in the comments – I’ll be eternally grateful.

Posted in: Random

Permalink | Trackback

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Social Bookmark this article: What is this?

11 Responses to “ Why I’ll miss Microsoft Encarta ”

  1. David Bayon Says:
    April 2nd, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    “Wikipedia may be the new one-stop-shop for knowledge”

    Hmmm. Not necessarily for the best.
    http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/46900,opinion,knowledge-by-consensus-wikipedia-jimmy-wales

     
  2. DaveButch Says:
    April 2nd, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    Wikipedia is so inaccurate as to be almost redundant in the modern idiom in my view.

     
  3. Stephen Ferns Says:
    April 2nd, 2009 at 9:17 pm

    You would think, if MS were nice, that they would offer the contect of Encarta to a project like Wikipedia and give them the beginning of something to make a Wikipedia alternative

     
  4. Steve Cassidy Says:
    April 3rd, 2009 at 9:38 am

    Without wishing to seem like the peanut gallery here, I’d take issue with the whole idea of a wone-stop shop for any kind of knowledge. We are already accustomed to the right to a second opinion when we seek medical knowledge, for instance: the natural monopolism of the computer business isn’t always a good thing when it comes to fields that computers have made more accessible.

     
  5. Mike Jennings Says:
    April 3rd, 2009 at 11:12 am

    Wikipedia may have its faults, sure, but it seems that the people who question its integrity and accuracy are in the minority – even if they’re right for questioning its accuracy, since having incorrect information in medical fields (as Steve pointed out) can be potentially life-threatening.

    Nevertheless, Wikipedia is now the de facto place to go, it seems, if you need to find out something quickly. I think it’s a shame that this is the case and professionally-research sources are falling by the wayside despite their numerous advantages.

     
  6. Mark Says:
    April 3rd, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    This constant “oooh, Wikipedia contains wrong stuff!” truism is getting boring now. Have you guys taken a critical eye to peer reviewed scientific and academic studies? Or books written by experts? They’re littered with deliberate lies, half-truths, omissions, and simple innacuracies.

    Wikipedia is no exception. The only thing it does worse is to contain amusing bits of vandalism, but it is your call whether to take a cursory glance at the reference.

     
  7. Sanjay Says:
    April 3rd, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    I, too, will miss the passing away of Encarta. Browsing through Encarta used to be a pleasurable experience. I can’t say I feel the same about Wikipedia. Apart from the suspect content, there is a marked difference in style of writing and general presentation of information. I sincerely hope that a scholarly alternative to Wikipedia appears in the not-too-distant future.

     
  8. Print Banners Says:
    April 4th, 2009 at 4:39 am

    This reminds me of when they started saying encyclopedias were obsolete due to the computer and Encarta. Now the cycle has taken a new turn and its sad to hear that something I grew up studying with (nearly 6-years, Im still young) will be put down.

     
  9. GillsMan Says:
    April 4th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    I remember Encarta fondly as well. MindMaze was brilliant and if I recall correctly your prize for completing the maze was a little mini game where you would be asked for a verb, a noun, a common noun, etc, and the words you entered would make up a story, so I could produce such funny results as:

    “DAVID BECKHAM was FARTING with his CAT FOOD in GILLINGHAM … ” and so on.

     
  10. Mike Jennings Says:
    April 4th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    GillsMan – very interesting! I’ll have to confess now that I never actually completed MindMaze, although I had plenty of fun trying. Quite intruiging to finally found out about the prize that you got for finishing it!

     
  11. Catherine Says:
    April 6th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    I remember having Encarta on CD-ROM – it was great for year 9 geography projects – with the slight downside that everyone else in the class would have the same images as you. Sad to see it go but not suprised.

    From what I’ve heard/read, peer-review amongst academics is becoming more common on wikipedia, particularly (obviously) on more in-depth scientific articles.

    Also heard a rumour that wikipedia have asked for the encarta content to be donated, not sure how reliable that one is though!

     

Leave a Reply

* required fields

* Will not be published

Categories

Authors

Archives

advertisement

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008