Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on April 2nd, 2009 by Tom Arah

My Third Most Disappointing Review Ever

After writing over 300 design-oriented reviews for PC Pro over the last 14 years there is clearly a danger of becoming jaded. I have to admit that my heart no longer jumps when the latest version of Paint Shop Pro drops on my desk for example. However there are some programs that still get me creatively excited – the Adobe apps obviously, Cinema 4D, Piranesi, SketchUp and so on. Near the top of this list is Corel Painter, the bitmap editor aimed at professional computer-based artists.

corel painter 11

Which makes the latest Corel Painter 11 all the more disappointing…

You can read my full review here. It won’t take you long and you’ll quickly see that there are absolutely no must-have features. In fact there aren’t any oh-that-looks-interesting features either. Or even any I-might-notice-that features. If an admirer secretly upgraded you, you would never know!

The bottom line is that I’ve seen plenty of free security updates that have rolled in more new functionality and to expect existing users to pay £117 for it is ridiculous. That’s around three times the cost of a full copy of Painter Essentials 4 (£38) which did see plenty of development effort on its last release and now, embarrassingly, leaves Painter itself trailing in some areas.

If Corel really has this little interest in developing what remains a flagship program in a key creative field it should pass it on to someone else (ideally Adobe). 

Tags: , , ,

Posted in: Rant, Real World Computing

Permalink | Trackback

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

3 Responses to “ My Third Most Disappointing Review Ever ”

  1. Painty McPainter Says:
    April 2nd, 2009 at 11:28 am

    Oh come on Tom, you can’t use a headline like “Third Most Disappointing Review Ever” and then not provide details of numbers one and two. That’s cruel!

     
  2. Tom Arah Says:
    April 2nd, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    Watch this space :)

     
  3. John Gray Says:
    April 2nd, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    I certainly found the review disappointing, but surely its title should have been “My Third Most Disappointing Software Upgrade Ever”?

     

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

* required fields

* Will not be published

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010