Posted on April 2nd, 2009 by Tom Arah
My Third Most Disappointing Review Ever
After writing over 300 design-oriented reviews for PC Pro over the last 14 years there is clearly a danger of becoming jaded. I have to admit that my heart no longer jumps when the latest version of Paint Shop Pro drops on my desk for example. However there are some programs that still get me creatively excited – the Adobe apps obviously, Cinema 4D, Piranesi, SketchUp and so on. Near the top of this list is Corel Painter, the bitmap editor aimed at professional computer-based artists.
Which makes the latest Corel Painter 11 all the more disappointing…
You can read my full review here. It won’t take you long and you’ll quickly see that there are absolutely no must-have features. In fact there aren’t any oh-that-looks-interesting features either. Or even any I-might-notice-that features. If an admirer secretly upgraded you, you would never know!
The bottom line is that I’ve seen plenty of free security updates that have rolled in more new functionality and to expect existing users to pay £117 for it is ridiculous. That’s around three times the cost of a full copy of Painter Essentials 4 (£38) which did see plenty of development effort on its last release and now, embarrassingly, leaves Painter itself trailing in some areas.
If Corel really has this little interest in developing what remains a flagship program in a key creative field it should pass it on to someone else (ideally Adobe).
Tags: art, corel, digital design, painter
Posted in: Rant, Real World Computing
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
3 Responses to “ My Third Most Disappointing Review Ever ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement



April 2nd, 2009 at 11:28 am
Oh come on Tom, you can’t use a headline like “Third Most Disappointing Review Ever” and then not provide details of numbers one and two. That’s cruel!
April 2nd, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Watch this space
April 2nd, 2009 at 5:21 pm
I certainly found the review disappointing, but surely its title should have been “My Third Most Disappointing Software Upgrade Ever”?