<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full HD &#8211; not all it&#8217;s cracked up to be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Full HD</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-104923</link>
		<dc:creator>Full HD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-104923</guid>
		<description>When some camera’s say they are Full HD they are not misleading you..like the Sanyo&#039;s 2009 HD Xacti camcorder –so I’ve heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When some camera’s say they are Full HD they are not misleading you..like the Sanyo&#8217;s 2009 HD Xacti camcorder –so I’ve heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandro</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-56993</link>
		<dc:creator>sandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-56993</guid>
		<description>Tenha 463 Canais de TV em seu PC 
www.tvhd.com.br Você está disposto a pagar quando para ter 463 canais em sua casa? 
Então acesse www.tvhd.com.br e descubra como ter 463 canais.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tvhd.com.br&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.tvhd.com.br&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tenha 463 Canais de TV em seu PC<br />
<a href="http://www.tvhd.com.br" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvhd.com.br</a> Você está disposto a pagar quando para ter 463 canais em sua casa?<br />
Então acesse <a href="http://www.tvhd.com.br" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvhd.com.br</a> e descubra como ter 463 canais.<br />
<a href="http://www.tvhd.com.br" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvhd.com.br</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeamgymnHape</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-56354</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeamgymnHape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-56354</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;[...] tart about the meaning of HD and megapixles - way to go at reinforcing the stereotypical ...&lt;/strong&gt;


 
	 
	 
	   
	   
	   
	   
		 
		 
		 
	   
	 
	 
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[...] tart about the meaning of HD and megapixles &#8211; way to go at reinforcing the stereotypical &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave F</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-50081</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-50081</guid>
		<description>David,

About the output to TV option...

As with most people who bimble around snapping other people at family get-togethers I find that the best way to show the results to a group is to plug the camera straight into a nearby telly...

Nicew big screen, nice bright images and no daft crowding round a tiny LCD or laptop screen...

P.S. &quot;Full HD&quot; and &quot;Wideangle LCD&quot; can&#039;t be a coincidence, especially given the preference for widescreen displays throughout the digital world... I guess those of us who remember APS cameras have seen all this &quot;panoramic aspect ratio&quot; stuff before... :-)

All the best

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>About the output to TV option&#8230;</p>
<p>As with most people who bimble around snapping other people at family get-togethers I find that the best way to show the results to a group is to plug the camera straight into a nearby telly&#8230;</p>
<p>Nicew big screen, nice bright images and no daft crowding round a tiny LCD or laptop screen&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S. &#8220;Full HD&#8221; and &#8220;Wideangle LCD&#8221; can&#8217;t be a coincidence, especially given the preference for widescreen displays throughout the digital world&#8230; I guess those of us who remember APS cameras have seen all this &#8220;panoramic aspect ratio&#8221; stuff before&#8230; <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>All the best</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-48937</link>
		<dc:creator>Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 06:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-48937</guid>
		<description>Take a look at the tag. It’s a full HD PHOTO, not TV connection. I for one think it can take HD photos!!! If I to see that tag. I can put money on it that all the manufactures only put the maximum number of pixels to make there product look good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at the tag. It’s a full HD PHOTO, not TV connection. I for one think it can take HD photos!!! If I to see that tag. I can put money on it that all the manufactures only put the maximum number of pixels to make there product look good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FatherTed</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-48756</link>
		<dc:creator>FatherTed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-48756</guid>
		<description>Sorry, David, but I&#039;m not buying your last comment. Your original article completely failed to mention the camera&#039;s ability to output full HD to a TV - the precise function the badge refers to. I can&#039;t give you figures for how popular it is but I have used TV output from my camera more than once, HD output is a feature I would find attractive.
Perhaps you just misunderstood what was being advertised? No shame there, but when in a hole, stop digging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, David, but I&#8217;m not buying your last comment. Your original article completely failed to mention the camera&#8217;s ability to output full HD to a TV &#8211; the precise function the badge refers to. I can&#8217;t give you figures for how popular it is but I have used TV output from my camera more than once, HD output is a feature I would find attractive.<br />
Perhaps you just misunderstood what was being advertised? No shame there, but when in a hole, stop digging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Fearon</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-48709</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fearon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-48709</guid>
		<description>Some interesting points there!

Yes, technically the HD Photo tag means you can plug your camera into an HD telly. But I&#039;m not buying it. Most punters seeing that logo will be hoodwinked into thinking that the camera is an HD camera. And that&#039;s disingenuous in my book. I&#039;d like to see the figures for the number of people who have ever plugged their camera into their TV.

Bryan - my maths are right I&#039;m afraid :-) Camera megapixel ratings refer to the number of complete three-colour pixels the camera spits out. It&#039;s true that as far the sensor is concerned, each photosite is filtered to only one colour and the other two colours are guesstimates, but a 12-megapixel camera nonetheless outputs 12 million full-colour pixels per image. And likewise, an HD 1080p frame is 2-megapixels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting points there!</p>
<p>Yes, technically the HD Photo tag means you can plug your camera into an HD telly. But I&#8217;m not buying it. Most punters seeing that logo will be hoodwinked into thinking that the camera is an HD camera. And that&#8217;s disingenuous in my book. I&#8217;d like to see the figures for the number of people who have ever plugged their camera into their TV.</p>
<p>Bryan &#8211; my maths are right I&#8217;m afraid <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Camera megapixel ratings refer to the number of complete three-colour pixels the camera spits out. It&#8217;s true that as far the sensor is concerned, each photosite is filtered to only one colour and the other two colours are guesstimates, but a 12-megapixel camera nonetheless outputs 12 million full-colour pixels per image. And likewise, an HD 1080p frame is 2-megapixels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickard Lucey</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-48699</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickard Lucey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-48699</guid>
		<description>While this may be a marketing band wagon, as RichardB states this obviously refers to the camera&#039;s ability to output images to HD tv&#039;s for preview purposes in full HD resolution as opposed to standard tv resolution. As a result two things bother me - that the writer of this post should have known this and why was it inevitable that an argument would start about the meaning of HD and megapixles - way to go at reinforcing the stereotypical geek image of guys working in IT. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this may be a marketing band wagon, as RichardB states this obviously refers to the camera&#8217;s ability to output images to HD tv&#8217;s for preview purposes in full HD resolution as opposed to standard tv resolution. As a result two things bother me &#8211; that the writer of this post should have known this and why was it inevitable that an argument would start about the meaning of HD and megapixles &#8211; way to go at reinforcing the stereotypical geek image of guys working in IT. <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-48660</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-48660</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m fairly sure that your maths are wrong. When camera manufacturers talk about megapixels each colour, red, green, and blue, counts as a separate pixel. So, to get HD resolution images on your PC you&#039;d have to multiply your results by 3. This adds up to a 6mp camera, which again isn&#039;t exactly leading edge today, but isn&#039;t quite as bad as your article suggests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fairly sure that your maths are wrong. When camera manufacturers talk about megapixels each colour, red, green, and blue, counts as a separate pixel. So, to get HD resolution images on your PC you&#8217;d have to multiply your results by 3. This adds up to a 6mp camera, which again isn&#8217;t exactly leading edge today, but isn&#8217;t quite as bad as your article suggests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bosman</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/30/full-hd-not-all-its-cracked-up-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-48602</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bosman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5363#comment-48602</guid>
		<description>except 2 mega pixel used to mean 1600x1200 (i.e. a 4x3 resolution and strictly speaking 1,920,000 pixels).

I&#039;m fairly sure cameras have not been taking widescreen HD images for very long (although obviously anyone with any nous could have cropped a 3 megapixel photo to size).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>except 2 mega pixel used to mean 1600&#215;1200 (i.e. a 4&#215;3 resolution and strictly speaking 1,920,000 pixels).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fairly sure cameras have not been taking widescreen HD images for very long (although obviously anyone with any nous could have cropped a 3 megapixel photo to size).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

