Posted on March 27th, 2009 by Steve Cassidy
I kissed a flash, and I liked it…
Someone was asking about SSD drive upgrades in a comment thread; I just took a bit of a risk and tried the OCZ Apex Series 120GB inside my two-ish year old MacBook Pro.
You want the short summary? It works. And how: the machine boots in a shade over 4 seconds.
The detail is where the devil lives, of course. This wasn’t a full test, by any means – i got a recommendation from a mate and thought the risk worth taking: I wanted to extend the life of the trusty MacBook but if it turned out the whole idea was a non-starter I could always use the SSD in a more mainstream laptop, and I wanted to see if the claimed advances in flash architecture really did make the whole concept more usable. Well, that and a conversation with the guys at Overclockers who instantly categorised all the cheaper options by a four-letter word rhyming with “trap”. But then, vendors with new expensive things to sell often do that…
Anyway, the details are varied but none are that unpleasant. Getting inside a MacBook Pro is not what I would call easy: there’s three different lengths of screw, two different heads (one a Torx T6 – not often found) and a couple of stages where you find yourself levering away at a bit of bendy metal alloy, grimacing like mad waiting for the loud CRACK. One type of CRACK indicates the right bits have sprung loose; the other indicates that the touchpad might not work again.
The only action I had to take which was peculiar to my choice of SSD replacement unit, and my use of the MacBook, was in reformatting the SSD. As delivered, it’s an NTFS/MBR single partition. For the Mac I needed 2 HFS+ partitions and a GUID based partition table. Changing over a storage device is easy in theory: click on the right bits of the Disk Utility in OSX and the job’s done. In practice, doing it to a device which is really a RAID0 array internally, arbitrated by its own onboard processor, is a little bit more nerve-wracking.
But you’re reading these words so you know it worked. For Apple people, the procedure I used was to change the MacBook’s startup volume to an external bootable firewire drive that has Leopard Server on it. Then I used SuperDuper to back up the boot volume to the spare space on the external drive, did the hardware swap, SuperDuper’ed the boot partition back to the SSD, and then changed startup disk back to the internal volume again.
Part of the reason why this isn’t the basis for a whole article in the mag is that, as with our infamous printer-ink sunlight fade test, the first week of use is no guide to later weeks. What’s more, there’s a huge variability in the nature, quality, performance and even life-cycle of Flash storage – the fact that any SSD looks like a disk volume is not because they are architected that way, but rather because there’s a storage processor flipping your bits around like billy-o behind the scenes, while trying to tell you that there’s nothing to see.
So I’m going to hold on my final verdict, and give only an interim thumbs up. Battery life is better by about 30% (though the battery use meter has gone nuts, so that’s only my estimate). The palm-rest with the SSD under it is a bit warmer than it was with a hard drive. Overall performance is massively faster, and I suppose theoretically, drop resistance is hugely better too. Though I’m not testing that!
Tags: apple, disk, Hardware, SSD, upgrade
Posted in: Hardware, Real World Computing
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
13 Responses to “ I kissed a flash, and I liked it… ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement


March 27th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Well, more details please, make model size of SSD.
My Dell M1330 160Gb HDD is 75% full and i need an upgrade.
Thanks
Ian
March 27th, 2009 at 4:09 pm
click on the “this” link on th second like of the blog- takes you to the product page for the hardware..
Steve
March 27th, 2009 at 4:10 pm
like? line! I may need to change the keyboard, now I’ve done the hard disk…
March 28th, 2009 at 8:54 pm
Interesting, shame the SSD drive cost as much as a PC laptop. Most of us will have to go with a 30Gb SSD or wait a few more years. (30GB is big enough for those who don’t carry thousands of MP3’s?).
I’m finding the spec of a SSD compared to a normal hard drive is difficult to compare.
E.g. your new SSD :
Read: Up to 230MB/sec
Write: Up to 160MB/sec
and a typical mechanical laptop hard drive:
Western Digital 320GB 2.5″ Laptop Hard Drive SATAII 5400rpm 8MB Cache (www.ebuyer.com/product/136790)
Data Transfer Rate 300 MBps
Also I would like to know how to install a cheaper 30Gb SSD into my desktop and install Vista onto it, whilst still having my normal hard drive to store the bulk of the data that’s only occasionally needed. (my budget solution to increase the overall speed).
Ive never set up Vista onto a completely new hard drive, I hear Microsoft have some sort of ‘lock’ that stops people copying windows? Even when the new installation is for a new hard drive for the same computer. (Please correct me if wrong).
Thanks for taking the risk and testing your computer, so we dont have to risk ours.
P.S. I hope you have disabled the hard drive defragment tool (If the Mac does this), as I hear a defragment can damaged a SSD hard drive.
March 28th, 2009 at 11:04 pm
It’s a big topic, Buster. To do what you are describing with your desktop, you would very probably have to re-install Vista on the new drive, and that depends on the exact nature of your Vista licence.
Comparing performance is confusing, not just for the numbers etiher: that deadly phrase “up to” makes the whole business very hard to quantify.
Macs don’t do an automatic defrag, but thanks for the warning – the problem being, the warning about not using a defragger applies to the first flush of flash devices. I’m rather hoping my device is at least second-generation – but nobody’ss maaking clear marks between the 8MB (yes, MB) USB drive I bought back around 2001, and the 120Gb of memory in my MacBook Pro. Both get called “Flash Drives”, and I don’t think that’s very helpful…
March 29th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
The Apex drives are based on the JMicron controller which means you will probably experience random pauses when the drive is reading and writing small files.
This may seem like a minor issue but it becomes really really annoying especially when you consider the amount you have to pay for these things.
From what I have read the OCZ Vertex which is based on a different controller is a much better purchase and if you really have a lot of money to burn the Intel SSD’s are unbeatable for performance.
March 29th, 2009 at 9:58 pm
A very interesting write-up on SSDs here:
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3531
for those who haven’t already read it.
I’ve been tempted by SSDs.. I just have a couple of issues beside the price – namely the JMicron lag as mentioned above and lifespan… Hmm… tempting though…
March 30th, 2009 at 12:19 am
So far I haven’t seen attributable delays in real use; however it would be something one would expect ot get worse over time, and while that clock is ticking, the R&D evidently continues, so I’m going to sit tight for at least the rest of this year.
March 30th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
What was the boot time with the ssd? Compared with the normal hd.
March 30th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
I’m testing from the point at which the Apple logo disappears, which is normally when you can hear the drive start jumping about.
- without SSD I’d say 30 seconds ish. That’s with the standard Apple mac Pro hard drive – 5400rpm, 120Gb 2.5 inch WD SATA with the sticker that alleges “apple firmware”…
- with SSD – slow count to three and it’s up. Next candidate machine is my old IBM Z series lappy, once I have saved up a few pennies, and that runs Vista Business, so then I can answer Buster’s questions too.
April 3rd, 2009 at 9:25 am
(and as I do more research, I’ll wave the flag for the Real World approach again. I can find thousands of blogs repeating the assertion about slowdowns on JMicron based drives: but only a tiny number putting a quantifiable measurement to it – and those who do say it’s a few percent. Nobody at JMicron is making much of a comment – and as I have been saying from the start here, my device isn’t a single-volume flash drive, it’s a RAID0 – 120Gb presented as a mirrored volume of 60Gb. One explanation for the lack of small-file slowdown could be that the mirror controller fudges round it by reading the most available of the two mirrors, though again, I have no direct evidence – as distinct from indirect, blog-derived anecdote – that this is actually happening)
April 5th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
So the Macbook Pro is about two years old? about the same as mine which has a SATA (150mb/s) controller rather than the SATA II (300mb/s). So theoretically the read and write speeds are greater than the bandwidth available. Does anybody think this could be an issue in real world performance? Because I’m thinking of jumping on the SSD bandwagon and getting a OCZ Vertex.
April 6th, 2009 at 10:22 am
The only issue that would concern me in that case is, even on SATA v1, is it faster than the spinning drive? If yes then do it; if no then don’t. In any event I’d expect the drive to outlast the laptop both in terms of durability and usability anyway.
One minor niggle which I haven’t yet got to the bottom of is that some power setting is making sleep misbehave when on battery power. Instead of going over to “baleful glowing LED mode” the MBPro just turns the LED off altogether and needs the battery popping out to get it going again. This is very similar to the failure this model/revision of MBPro went through where the temperature management unit would go nuts, so I’m watching for signs and portents very carefully!
(still not a reason to avoid SSD upgrades, though…)