Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on February 5th, 2009 by Mike Jennings

Finally – the self-build PC lives

The cable-tying kit certainly came in handy.It’s been a long and arduous process: ever since our esteemed Editor challenged me and four of my colleagues to acquire computers for £250 – with Stuart Turton trying to blag one for free – I’ve been scratching around dozens of online retailers to find the cheapest components and the most reasonable component prices.

Last week I finally put together a specification I was happy with and ordered my components, and it was soon time to start building. A somewhat slap-dash assembly proved that the rig worked, and yesterday my three replacement case fans turned up.

Fitting those wasn’t easy – the two fans at the front of the machine were surrounded by small, bevelled metallic edges, so removing them from the chassis was a combination of brute force and pure luck which left my fingers covered in small cuts. Once installed, though, the three fans worked like a dream, and the noise pumping out of the Warrior 250 – which is the machine’s current name, incidentally – was halved.

The successful fan installation meant that I could press my cable management kit into service, and liberal use of cable ties and sticky pads resulted in a chassis that many a professional PC builder would be proud of: power cables are tied to free drive bays, smaller cables are lashed to the bottom of the chassis and some spare wire is even tucked away behind the motherboard, out of sight.

After my earlier overclocking misadventures – my initial 20% overclock saw the PC fail to even get to the motherboard loading screen – I restricted my ambitions to an initial 5%. This worked fine, so I upped the overclock to 10%, which gave me a clock speed of 2.75GHz – enough for now, although I haven’t yet delved into the more advanced options available in the BIOS. Still, a 10% performance boost isn’t to be sniffed at, especially when trying to run more demanding applications.

I’m intending to dive into the more hardcore performance options tomorrow to see if I can extract more performance out of my plucky Pentium Dual Core.

In the mean-time, Warrior 250 has the naming crown – but late contenders are always welcome, so post them in the comments below.

Tags: , , ,

Posted in: Random

Permalink | Trackback

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

8 Responses to “ Finally – the self-build PC lives ”

  1. Brian Says:
    February 6th, 2009 at 9:44 am

    Blowhard 0.25k or Wispa 250?

     
  2. Philip Says:
    February 6th, 2009 at 10:19 am

    I’ve taken my 1.8 Ghz E2160 to 3.0 Ghz, taking the CPU voltage to 1.4V from 1.325V and raising the other system voltages a touch too. Runs stable and doesn’t push too much beyond 50 degrees C when stress tested – impressive I think for a £40 chip. I’ll be interested to see how far you can push this chip – my hunch is the higher-end parts won’t go quite as far as the lower-end one, as they may be running close to their possible speed.

     
  3. megatron Says:
    February 6th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    How about Optimus Poundland. It has a nice ring to it….

     
  4. Peter Tennant Says:
    February 6th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    My suggestion is the Jennings PC Pro Warrior 250PCWGFS – because to be a REAL computer, it has to have a monumentally uncatchy name.

    P.S. 250PCWGFS stands for ‘250 pound computer with go faster stripes’

     
  5. Mike Jennings Says:
    February 6th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    Brian, Megatron and Peter Tennant – thank you for the naming suggestions! I’m currently mulling over your inspired names, with office opinion leaking towards Blowhard 0.25k.

    Philip – With a 10% overclock at 2.75GHz, the E5200 seems to run stably and doesn’t overheat – so I may leave it at that. Knowing me, though, I’ll push it a little further and break the machine entirely!

     
  6. Grimer Says:
    February 9th, 2009 at 2:21 am

    You should be able to get a lot more out of that CPU.

    10%??? You call that an overclock?

    Seriously, I think you should be able to hit 3.4GHz without too much trouble.

     
  7. Piero Says:
    February 10th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    This machine is £100!!
    Wow £250 is alot of cash to waste :P

    http://www.advancetec.co.uk/acatalog/Intel_Desktop_board_D945GCLF_with_integrated_intel_atom_processor.html
    £52.89
    D945GCLF

    http://www.techbitsonline.co.uk/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=KVR533D2E4/512
    512mn ram
    £6.07

    http://www.aria.co.uk/SuperSpecials/Other+products/80GB+Samsung+Spinpoint+S166+SATA+II+Hard+Drive+?productId=34085
    80gb hard drive
    £25

    case + 300w psu
    http://www.ebuyer.com/product/106740
    £16

     
  8. The £250 Challenge: Vote for the High Street | PC Pro blog Says:
    March 16th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    [...] a capable but slightly dull PC – without a monitor. Alongside him, Mike Jennings put together a capable and slightly insane PC – without a [...]

     

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

* required fields

* Will not be published

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010