<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kaspersky causes Windows 7 slowdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-136720</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-136720</guid>
		<description>I too have just purchased a superfast PC with Windows 7 and it was reduced to a snails pace after installing Kapersky Internet Security 2010. My PC has an Intel i7 processor and 8mb of memory and it was running slower than my old PC which had an Intel Celeron and 512mb of memory!
I contacted the PC supplier who told me that the problem would definitely be Kapersky and that I should remove it immediately. Bingo! Superfast PC once more! He recommemded downloading and installing Microsofts own free program and so far I have no complaints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have just purchased a superfast PC with Windows 7 and it was reduced to a snails pace after installing Kapersky Internet Security 2010. My PC has an Intel i7 processor and 8mb of memory and it was running slower than my old PC which had an Intel Celeron and 512mb of memory!<br />
I contacted the PC supplier who told me that the problem would definitely be Kapersky and that I should remove it immediately. Bingo! Superfast PC once more! He recommemded downloading and installing Microsofts own free program and so far I have no complaints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-106483</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-106483</guid>
		<description>I had the same problem with Kaspersky and suffered painfully slow and non responsive Windows 7.  
Uninstalled the piece of junk and Win 7 runs like a dream. 
I will never use Kaspersky again, I don&#039;t give a sh*t if it&#039;s beta, Microsoft should remove them off their list of recommended av providers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same problem with Kaspersky and suffered painfully slow and non responsive Windows 7.<br />
Uninstalled the piece of junk and Win 7 runs like a dream.<br />
I will never use Kaspersky again, I don&#8217;t give a sh*t if it&#8217;s beta, Microsoft should remove them off their list of recommended av providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ribeiro Portugal</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-56329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ribeiro Portugal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-56329</guid>
		<description>Running Build 7100. Absolutely no problems with Kaspersky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running Build 7100. Absolutely no problems with Kaspersky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Toronto</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-50822</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-50822</guid>
		<description>No problems with Windows 7 - build 7077; however, there have been certain files once downloaded that have caused Kasp preview to crash and require a system restart.

Quickly had to stop the download (FF restarted automatically - system crash again when file was downloaded).

System again crashed when a 120M error log was being sent to Kasp for evaluation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problems with Windows 7 &#8211; build 7077; however, there have been certain files once downloaded that have caused Kasp preview to crash and require a system restart.</p>
<p>Quickly had to stop the download (FF restarted automatically &#8211; system crash again when file was downloaded).</p>
<p>System again crashed when a 120M error log was being sent to Kasp for evaluation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Godfrey</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-33796</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Godfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-33796</guid>
		<description>I have certainly encountered the delay when typing into web forms.  It is not consistent, only a few web sites suffer from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have certainly encountered the delay when typing into web forms.  It is not consistent, only a few web sites suffer from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaak</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30071</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-30071</guid>
		<description>It is a good thing beta issues get found while running a machine through its paces. For testing real live behaviour, one tries to load and do as much as one would on a non-beta test machine. I thought it was not wise to use this beta loaded with other betas as if this was a production machine. A reviewer can write up findings in a production machine, and do screenshots on the beta machine, and the beta machine should have access to a dedicated virtual server for sharing data &#039;accessible to same reviewer&#039; so that major issues in beta do not spread to production environment.
The beta is in public too. I wonder how many betas are used on machines in daily use running real daily life tasks, rather than for finding bugs and annoyances. 
For testing, I use a non-critical machine that won&#039;t set me back if things go poof. 
Kind regards, Jaak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good thing beta issues get found while running a machine through its paces. For testing real live behaviour, one tries to load and do as much as one would on a non-beta test machine. I thought it was not wise to use this beta loaded with other betas as if this was a production machine. A reviewer can write up findings in a production machine, and do screenshots on the beta machine, and the beta machine should have access to a dedicated virtual server for sharing data &#8216;accessible to same reviewer&#8217; so that major issues in beta do not spread to production environment.<br />
The beta is in public too. I wonder how many betas are used on machines in daily use running real daily life tasks, rather than for finding bugs and annoyances.<br />
For testing, I use a non-critical machine that won&#8217;t set me back if things go poof.<br />
Kind regards, Jaak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-29638</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-29638</guid>
		<description>Who cares about a slow down, as long as you are well protected.
I ran the Anti-Virus or Anti-Malware test file from http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm
AVG allowed me to download the double zipped ARCHIVEe and detected it only after I unzipped and tried to install.
Kasperskie intercepted the attempted download of the double zipped file at point blank range with a red warning, advising me to terminate the download. 
It the went in to detail saying &quot;The following error was encountered:
The requested object is INFECTED with the following virus: EICAR-Test_File&quot;.
&quot;Please contact your service provider if you consider it uncorrect&quot;.
It doesn&#039;t take a lot of working out as, especially as eicar advised that good scanners will detect the virus&#039; in the single zip ARCHIVEe and may even in the double zip ARCHIVEe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about a slow down, as long as you are well protected.<br />
I ran the Anti-Virus or Anti-Malware test file from <a href="http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm</a><br />
AVG allowed me to download the double zipped ARCHIVEe and detected it only after I unzipped and tried to install.<br />
Kasperskie intercepted the attempted download of the double zipped file at point blank range with a red warning, advising me to terminate the download.<br />
It the went in to detail saying &#8220;The following error was encountered:<br />
The requested object is INFECTED with the following virus: EICAR-Test_File&#8221;.<br />
&#8220;Please contact your service provider if you consider it uncorrect&#8221;.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t take a lot of working out as, especially as eicar advised that good scanners will detect the virus&#8217; in the single zip ARCHIVEe and may even in the double zip ARCHIVEe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-29542</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-29542</guid>
		<description>Try using NOD32. I have been using the BETA 4 that is pretty much v3 with bells as far as I can see. Anyway, been using that for a while and had no problems

Google NOD32 beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try using NOD32. I have been using the BETA 4 that is pretty much v3 with bells as far as I can see. Anyway, been using that for a while and had no problems</p>
<p>Google NOD32 beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-29527</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-29527</guid>
		<description>I second that Matt; installed AVG Free edition and runs fine, updates ok with no W7 or Office 2007 issues found</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that Matt; installed AVG Free edition and runs fine, updates ok with no W7 or Office 2007 issues found</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/27/kaspersky-causes-windows-7-slowdown/comment-page-1/#comment-29282</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5083#comment-29282</guid>
		<description>I upgraded from Vista to Windows 7 and had AVG free installed, which still works in Windows 7.  I did an update and a scan last night....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I upgraded from Vista to Windows 7 and had AVG free installed, which still works in Windows 7.  I did an update and a scan last night&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
