<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My mummy said it&#8217;s good to share</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:51:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: technogeist</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20499</link>
		<dc:creator>technogeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20499</guid>
		<description>Good music made by whom? If a musician&#039;s chance of making a decent living is diminished, why would/should they pursue a career in music?

I agree that the music industry is its own worst enemy, and has shown enormous greed. But they still have a role to play in developing new talent &amp; funding the expensive tours that you &#039;hope&#039; will happen in future.

Only time will tell.

Like yourself, I hope that future bands &#039;can&#039; cut out the middleman by going the direct route, through website sales. Until then I believe that the old model still has benefits for the cash strapped wannabes
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good music made by whom? If a musician&#8217;s chance of making a decent living is diminished, why would/should they pursue a career in music?</p>
<p>I agree that the music industry is its own worst enemy, and has shown enormous greed. But they still have a role to play in developing new talent &amp; funding the expensive tours that you &#8216;hope&#8217; will happen in future.</p>
<p>Only time will tell.</p>
<p>Like yourself, I hope that future bands &#8216;can&#8217; cut out the middleman by going the direct route, through website sales. Until then I believe that the old model still has benefits for the cash strapped wannabes<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20412</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20412</guid>
		<description>technogeist ... With the old model people still had to seek out the gems from a sea of crap. There has and always will be crap on the airwaves and in the shops. But it’s all based on your own personal viewpoint about what is good and what is bad.  There was less choice than today because less people could afford the fees to record and there were a lot less outlets for musicians. You had to have big record industry backing or you&#039;d get no where. Today anyone can make a record and anyone can put it online and anyone can publicise it. And feel proud of what they have created. Good music will always spread by word of mouth. I really do not believe things will be like multi channel TV because on line music is much more of a social thing and can be spread. Sure you can get swamped by the multitude of choice but that’s what’s so good about it being online - you can get recommendations for other artists you may be interested in. 
And any way the point is not about having too much choice because that will come from an internet based model - whether you pay for it online or get it for free.
I believe the choice will still be excellent because 1) all the many years of music are available freely and 2) People will perpetually create and put music online because they can and will and because music is fun!!!
The public don&#039;t have a problem with free music. Most of the artist’s don’t have a problem with it. Get your music for free and go pay to see the artists and buy their T-Shirts. (If they are after money). Or just get their music for free because we will keep making it despite not making any money from it. Forget the old model because it&#039;s on the verge of being history. There is absolutely nothing that can be done about that. Move on and cut out the record industry because it is such a restrictive institution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>technogeist &#8230; With the old model people still had to seek out the gems from a sea of crap. There has and always will be crap on the airwaves and in the shops. But it’s all based on your own personal viewpoint about what is good and what is bad.  There was less choice than today because less people could afford the fees to record and there were a lot less outlets for musicians. You had to have big record industry backing or you&#8217;d get no where. Today anyone can make a record and anyone can put it online and anyone can publicise it. And feel proud of what they have created. Good music will always spread by word of mouth. I really do not believe things will be like multi channel TV because on line music is much more of a social thing and can be spread. Sure you can get swamped by the multitude of choice but that’s what’s so good about it being online &#8211; you can get recommendations for other artists you may be interested in.<br />
And any way the point is not about having too much choice because that will come from an internet based model &#8211; whether you pay for it online or get it for free.<br />
I believe the choice will still be excellent because 1) all the many years of music are available freely and 2) People will perpetually create and put music online because they can and will and because music is fun!!!<br />
The public don&#8217;t have a problem with free music. Most of the artist’s don’t have a problem with it. Get your music for free and go pay to see the artists and buy their T-Shirts. (If they are after money). Or just get their music for free because we will keep making it despite not making any money from it. Forget the old model because it&#8217;s on the verge of being history. There is absolutely nothing that can be done about that. Move on and cut out the record industry because it is such a restrictive institution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technogeist</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20268</link>
		<dc:creator>technogeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20268</guid>
		<description>An afterthought..

Maybe a case can be made for a &#039; threat to a country&#039;s economic health&#039;, this could be used as a way to persuade uncooperative countries that knowingly allow filesharing (trackers and hosts) to operate within their borders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An afterthought..</p>
<p>Maybe a case can be made for a &#8216; threat to a country&#8217;s economic health&#8217;, this could be used as a way to persuade uncooperative countries that knowingly allow filesharing (trackers and hosts) to operate within their borders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technogeist</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20265</link>
		<dc:creator>technogeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20265</guid>
		<description>Until there&#039;s universal cooperation between countries about identifying and allowing extradition (where court appearances are required) there&#039;s unlikely to be progress.
Then there&#039;s the issue of the non-techies who don&#039;t know or care, that their wireless networks are using weak or non-existent encryption, which makes the uploader&#039;s life that much simpler.

A far more effective method would be to remove filesharing domains from the DNS server records. The last time I checked there is gov&#039;t control of ICANN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until there&#8217;s universal cooperation between countries about identifying and allowing extradition (where court appearances are required) there&#8217;s unlikely to be progress.<br />
Then there&#8217;s the issue of the non-techies who don&#8217;t know or care, that their wireless networks are using weak or non-existent encryption, which makes the uploader&#8217;s life that much simpler.</p>
<p>A far more effective method would be to remove filesharing domains from the DNS server records. The last time I checked there is gov&#8217;t control of ICANN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodeo Skunk</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20256</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodeo Skunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20256</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it the uploaders who are the problem rather than the downloaders?  Wouldn&#039;t it be easier to chase the uploaders since there are probably far less of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it the uploaders who are the problem rather than the downloaders?  Wouldn&#8217;t it be easier to chase the uploaders since there are probably far less of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodeo Skunk</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20253</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodeo Skunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20253</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it the uploaders that are the problem rather than the downloaders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it the uploaders that are the problem rather than the downloaders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technogeist</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20238</link>
		<dc:creator>technogeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20238</guid>
		<description>Those millions of artists that you have to choose from were remunerated from the old model. How much choice will there be when that model is undermined?

Its going to be like multi-channel TV. Having to seek out gems from a sea of mediocre crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those millions of artists that you have to choose from were remunerated from the old model. How much choice will there be when that model is undermined?</p>
<p>Its going to be like multi-channel TV. Having to seek out gems from a sea of mediocre crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20187</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20187</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t understand what all the fuss is about. I read somewhere once that downloading will be the death of music. How can it be when musicians and artists like myself write and perform music not for money...But for something else far more rewarding... fun and entertainment! 
Musicians and artists a few generations back couldn?t even record music! But they still created it and made a bit of cash from entertaining people. Music has been around thousands of years and is a strong social glue. Do we really need to be slapped with the label of stealing music when we all sing &quot;happy birthday&quot; etc...Freddie Mercury, Frank Sinatra, Kurt Cobain, Jimmy Hendrix, John Lennon and Bob Marley certainly don&#039;t live on because how much money they made throughout their career. And they would always have been making music and playing in pubs and clubs even if they weren?t megastars. 
 I think its brilliant that I have access to a million different artists and can find new ones on a daily basis (how is this possible with the old fashion radio and purchasing music model)  If I really like and respect the band they&#039;ll probably make a bit of money from me going to see one of their shows. But if they are half way decent they&#039;ll build up respect and a fan base. Why is money the most important thing? Can&#039;t musicians work in other industries and just create music as a sideline? Professional music is so cheap to create and produce in your own bedroom. Why can&#039;t a free model work? I&#039;m not starving and hungry and I can still pay my mortgage - but I write and give my songs away for free.  This is the modern world get used to it. Things change! Technology changes everything and it&#039;s attitudes that need to move with the times not stay stuck in the past? Check out simonband.co.uk if you get the chance. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand what all the fuss is about. I read somewhere once that downloading will be the death of music. How can it be when musicians and artists like myself write and perform music not for money&#8230;But for something else far more rewarding&#8230; fun and entertainment!<br />
Musicians and artists a few generations back couldn?t even record music! But they still created it and made a bit of cash from entertaining people. Music has been around thousands of years and is a strong social glue. Do we really need to be slapped with the label of stealing music when we all sing &#8220;happy birthday&#8221; etc&#8230;Freddie Mercury, Frank Sinatra, Kurt Cobain, Jimmy Hendrix, John Lennon and Bob Marley certainly don&#8217;t live on because how much money they made throughout their career. And they would always have been making music and playing in pubs and clubs even if they weren?t megastars.<br />
 I think its brilliant that I have access to a million different artists and can find new ones on a daily basis (how is this possible with the old fashion radio and purchasing music model)  If I really like and respect the band they&#8217;ll probably make a bit of money from me going to see one of their shows. But if they are half way decent they&#8217;ll build up respect and a fan base. Why is money the most important thing? Can&#8217;t musicians work in other industries and just create music as a sideline? Professional music is so cheap to create and produce in your own bedroom. Why can&#8217;t a free model work? I&#8217;m not starving and hungry and I can still pay my mortgage &#8211; but I write and give my songs away for free.  This is the modern world get used to it. Things change! Technology changes everything and it&#8217;s attitudes that need to move with the times not stay stuck in the past? Check out simonband.co.uk if you get the chance. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technogeist</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20148</link>
		<dc:creator>technogeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20148</guid>
		<description>An ideal christmas gift for little tikes.

http://www.computergear.com/pispcdho.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ideal christmas gift for little tikes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computergear.com/pispcdho.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.computergear.com/pispcdho.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technogeist</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/03/my-mummy-said-its-good-to-share/comment-page-1/#comment-20133</link>
		<dc:creator>technogeist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4494#comment-20133</guid>
		<description>Why do some manufacturers of cd/dvd burners i.e Sony,  also represent &amp; publish the music of artists that their hardware is making so easy to copy.
If I were a musician. I&#039;d be asking &#039;OK who did I sign the deal with, Jeckyll or Hyde?&#039;

It&#039;s the dirt-cheap hardware which makes no attempt to put obstacles in the consumer&#039;s way, making it a win-win for the pirates. Some software such as Nero does attempt to block copying of copyright materia. So many alternatives to Nero etc, cost nothing and don&#039;t even try to block the use of copyright stuff. Another win-win for the pirates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do some manufacturers of cd/dvd burners i.e Sony,  also represent &amp; publish the music of artists that their hardware is making so easy to copy.<br />
If I were a musician. I&#8217;d be asking &#8216;OK who did I sign the deal with, Jeckyll or Hyde?&#8217;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the dirt-cheap hardware which makes no attempt to put obstacles in the consumer&#8217;s way, making it a win-win for the pirates. Some software such as Nero does attempt to block copying of copyright materia. So many alternatives to Nero etc, cost nothing and don&#8217;t even try to block the use of copyright stuff. Another win-win for the pirates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
