<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ofcom: the chocolate fireguard starts to crack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:29:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rural broadband internet</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-22308</link>
		<dc:creator>rural broadband internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-22308</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;rural broadband internet...&lt;/strong&gt;

Some weblog software programs, such as Wordpress, Movable Type and Community Server, support automatic pingbacks where all the links...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>rural broadband internet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Some weblog software programs, such as Wordpress, Movable Type and Community Server, support automatic pingbacks where all the links&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19512</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19512</guid>
		<description>&quot;Surely chocolate fireguards melt rather than crack?&quot;
   Only when heat is applied to them. Excessive cold or blunt trauma applied to an unheated chocolate fireguard could indeed cause it to crack.
   Now, Mr Paxman, may I have his &#039;Pedant of the Year&#039; award?

On topic, I find it ridiculous that we&#039;re so far behind other european countries in terms of broadband speed and cost. 
 I remember i nearly fell off my seat when working in Maastricht several years ago. I was watching a TV advert for 20Mb home broadband for around 25 euros per month. Up until that point, I had been feeling smug for paying £50 a month for 4Mb, which was the fastest i could get. 
   Now, 4 years later, we have the speed available in some areas, but for a vastly greater price than the Netherlands were paying. I&#039;m sure they&#039;ve got some nice deals now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Surely chocolate fireguards melt rather than crack?&#8221;<br />
   Only when heat is applied to them. Excessive cold or blunt trauma applied to an unheated chocolate fireguard could indeed cause it to crack.<br />
   Now, Mr Paxman, may I have his &#8216;Pedant of the Year&#8217; award?</p>
<p>On topic, I find it ridiculous that we&#8217;re so far behind other european countries in terms of broadband speed and cost.<br />
 I remember i nearly fell off my seat when working in Maastricht several years ago. I was watching a TV advert for 20Mb home broadband for around 25 euros per month. Up until that point, I had been feeling smug for paying £50 a month for 4Mb, which was the fastest i could get.<br />
   Now, 4 years later, we have the speed available in some areas, but for a vastly greater price than the Netherlands were paying. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ve got some nice deals now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gindylow</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19251</link>
		<dc:creator>Gindylow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19251</guid>
		<description>In conjunction with Mr Paxman who takes cynic of the year... ;-)

OFCOM

Officially Feckless, Clueless &amp; Out Moded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In conjunction with Mr Paxman who takes cynic of the year&#8230; <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>OFCOM</p>
<p>Officially Feckless, Clueless &amp; Out Moded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy paxman</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19233</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy paxman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19233</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;m pleased to announce that John Hind wins the &#039;Pedant of the Year&#039; award. Well done, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m pleased to announce that John Hind wins the &#8216;Pedant of the Year&#8217; award. Well done, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19224</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19224</guid>
		<description>By and large, the ISP&#039;s do seem to be getting their act together just a little, but the poor customer service and the false advertising Does need something done about it.
The thing to do is, in the first instance, complain to OFCOM. When they ignore/flannel/patronise you, complain to your MP.
 If enough of us do it, they Will take heed as there will be a lot of them terrified for their overpaid jobs and expense accounts in a year or two.
Make them do somrthing for your vote!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By and large, the ISP&#8217;s do seem to be getting their act together just a little, but the poor customer service and the false advertising Does need something done about it.<br />
The thing to do is, in the first instance, complain to OFCOM. When they ignore/flannel/patronise you, complain to your MP.<br />
 If enough of us do it, they Will take heed as there will be a lot of them terrified for their overpaid jobs and expense accounts in a year or two.<br />
Make them do somrthing for your vote!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian FIsher</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19218</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian FIsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19218</guid>
		<description>Taxes are extracted from the taxpayer, with the ultimate sanction of going to prison if you don&#039;t pay.  Any organisation that is funded so comfortably has a HIGHER duty of service, performance and care.  It also has the power and teeth to get its way.  Without even a competitive organisation with which to fight for market share, OFCOM should be able to devote itself entirely to its mission. 

OFCOM should set itself the task to set, monitor and achieve world-class standards.  In a world where technology is fast-moving, the standard will be ever-rising.  It should be easier to catch up, when we are lagging behind other countries and they are showing us how it can be done (if they can achieve higher standards, why can&#039;t our ISPs?  Part of OFCOM&#039;s task is to find out if it doesn&#039;t know).

One thing that would help would be a statutory requirement that by 2012 all software on UK computers must VISIBLY display the actual speed of broadband transmission being achieved (a) second by second, (b) minute by minute, and (c) average during the connection time within the past 24 hours.  Not just hidden away on some obscure menu selection, but as a default pop-up panel on the screen that has to be actively removed if you don&#039;t want it.  Just like the Speedometer on a car is not hidden away under the bonnet, alongside the oil dipstick.

Even better, there could be a statistics table of such speeds being achieved by different providers in one&#039;s immedate telephone district.  Day by day, comparisons could be made.  Press and radio could make reports.  I know I would find this useful when my current contract comes to its end.







.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxes are extracted from the taxpayer, with the ultimate sanction of going to prison if you don&#8217;t pay.  Any organisation that is funded so comfortably has a HIGHER duty of service, performance and care.  It also has the power and teeth to get its way.  Without even a competitive organisation with which to fight for market share, OFCOM should be able to devote itself entirely to its mission. </p>
<p>OFCOM should set itself the task to set, monitor and achieve world-class standards.  In a world where technology is fast-moving, the standard will be ever-rising.  It should be easier to catch up, when we are lagging behind other countries and they are showing us how it can be done (if they can achieve higher standards, why can&#8217;t our ISPs?  Part of OFCOM&#8217;s task is to find out if it doesn&#8217;t know).</p>
<p>One thing that would help would be a statutory requirement that by 2012 all software on UK computers must VISIBLY display the actual speed of broadband transmission being achieved (a) second by second, (b) minute by minute, and (c) average during the connection time within the past 24 hours.  Not just hidden away on some obscure menu selection, but as a default pop-up panel on the screen that has to be actively removed if you don&#8217;t want it.  Just like the Speedometer on a car is not hidden away under the bonnet, alongside the oil dipstick.</p>
<p>Even better, there could be a statistics table of such speeds being achieved by different providers in one&#8217;s immedate telephone district.  Day by day, comparisons could be made.  Press and radio could make reports.  I know I would find this useful when my current contract comes to its end.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hind</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19161</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19161</guid>
		<description>Surely chocolate fireguards melt rather than crack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely chocolate fireguards melt rather than crack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19146</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19146</guid>
		<description>&quot;More than half of Britons haven’t got the first clue&quot;

You could have stooped there. Except it implies that the edukashun system has improved around 3000% under new Labour. Perhaps that&#039;s the real story &quot;More than half of Britons now have a clue&quot;

I&#039;m with VM and get 10mbps as advertised, so, for reasons of gratuitous spite, I&#039;m quite happy the rest of you have crappy internet connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;More than half of Britons haven’t got the first clue&#8221;</p>
<p>You could have stooped there. Except it implies that the edukashun system has improved around 3000% under new Labour. Perhaps that&#8217;s the real story &#8220;More than half of Britons now have a clue&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with VM and get 10mbps as advertised, so, for reasons of gratuitous spite, I&#8217;m quite happy the rest of you have crappy internet connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19143</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19143</guid>
		<description>Personally, I want the service I pay for. No more and no less. It is that simple.

If an ISP cannot provide the service of merchantable quality, they should not be advertising the service, pure and simple. You are asked by signing up to the contract to guarrantee payments for quality which is not guarranteed in return. Doesn&#039;t sound like a good deal to me.

As an example, would you accept TV reception at 10 frames per second because the provider can&#039;t provide the full service or because too many other people in the UK are also viewing it? Broadband is no different.

While I don&#039;t agree with some of the presentation of material in the press the bottom line remains unchanged...

Ofcom, wake up. We want to receive a reasonable standard the goods for the money we pay. No more, no less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I want the service I pay for. No more and no less. It is that simple.</p>
<p>If an ISP cannot provide the service of merchantable quality, they should not be advertising the service, pure and simple. You are asked by signing up to the contract to guarrantee payments for quality which is not guarranteed in return. Doesn&#8217;t sound like a good deal to me.</p>
<p>As an example, would you accept TV reception at 10 frames per second because the provider can&#8217;t provide the full service or because too many other people in the UK are also viewing it? Broadband is no different.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t agree with some of the presentation of material in the press the bottom line remains unchanged&#8230;</p>
<p>Ofcom, wake up. We want to receive a reasonable standard the goods for the money we pay. No more, no less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordon brown</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/25/ofcom-the-chocolate-fireguard-starts-to-crack/comment-page-1/#comment-19104</link>
		<dc:creator>gordon brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4416#comment-19104</guid>
		<description>I view my stats and IPprofile as I want to receive what I pay for. If my ISP states up to 8mb they better do their best to deliver up to 8mb, not 2mb.

If I wanted 2mb I would pay for a 2mb line (non adslmax)

All of last year I was connecting at 7mbps, this year my ISP decides (well BT through their profiling nonsense) bought it down to 5mbps.

I complained and the connection is back up to 7mbps. Do people realise Sweden and other developed countries have 100mbps lines? All we have is the BT chairman complaining that they cannot deliver 40mbps, what is it to hard to work out how to do it?

Why do I need 7mbps? Well the internet has so many uses other than browsing, and those times you want to view emails, work remotely via vpn and download a show through iplayer I dont want to have my experience spoilt by a rubbish 2mbp line.

It amazes me how people in the UK put up with anything as they cannot be bothered to complain.

My wife and I complain to companies and have received redunds, discounts, and recently a free camera via canon&#039;s ebay site because they failed to deliver a camera to my house. All it took was a couple of emails.

If Ofcom keep saying &#039;everything is ok&#039;, then we need to stand up and tell them its not. Show them test results done through the bt speed test site, and ask them for a written reply.

Post your replies so everyone can see what is going on...I could go on but rather enjoy my speedy connection :_) Oh I am with adsl24, which does not block ports, throttle my connection and offers a LLU connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I view my stats and IPprofile as I want to receive what I pay for. If my ISP states up to 8mb they better do their best to deliver up to 8mb, not 2mb.</p>
<p>If I wanted 2mb I would pay for a 2mb line (non adslmax)</p>
<p>All of last year I was connecting at 7mbps, this year my ISP decides (well BT through their profiling nonsense) bought it down to 5mbps.</p>
<p>I complained and the connection is back up to 7mbps. Do people realise Sweden and other developed countries have 100mbps lines? All we have is the BT chairman complaining that they cannot deliver 40mbps, what is it to hard to work out how to do it?</p>
<p>Why do I need 7mbps? Well the internet has so many uses other than browsing, and those times you want to view emails, work remotely via vpn and download a show through iplayer I dont want to have my experience spoilt by a rubbish 2mbp line.</p>
<p>It amazes me how people in the UK put up with anything as they cannot be bothered to complain.</p>
<p>My wife and I complain to companies and have received redunds, discounts, and recently a free camera via canon&#8217;s ebay site because they failed to deliver a camera to my house. All it took was a couple of emails.</p>
<p>If Ofcom keep saying &#8216;everything is ok&#8217;, then we need to stand up and tell them its not. Show them test results done through the bt speed test site, and ask them for a written reply.</p>
<p>Post your replies so everyone can see what is going on&#8230;I could go on but rather enjoy my speedy connection :_) Oh I am with adsl24, which does not block ports, throttle my connection and offers a LLU connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
