Posted on November 5th, 2008 by Tim Danton
Windows 7: first impressions
I’d reached that point where I needed to nuke my Windows install. Everything was just taking too long, the hard disk was whirring away almost constantly, and it was taking up to two minutes just to answer an email.
I knew perfectly well that it would be obscenely stupid to install Windows 7 on my main work machine. This isn’t even proper beta software; it’s aimed at developers so they’ve got something to work on.
The only reason the Windows 7 install disc was sitting to my left, tempting me with its shiny ways, was because Barry Collins, our esteemed news, features and online editor, had spent last week at PDC – Microsoft’s Professional Developers Conference.
So I did the responsible thing, backed up all my data, fished out a Windows Vista install disc, and congratulated myself on not giving in to temptation.
And then I thought: “sod it”. In went the Windows 7 disc, out went all sensible thoughts about working responsibly, and two rather tedious hours later I had a fully working Windows 7 system sitting before me.
And do you know what? It’s brilliant.
Blink and you’ll miss it
For starters, it’s incredibly fast. Now I know my old Windows Vista system was starting to creak at the seams due to the weight of dodgy software I’ve installed on it , but I do remember what it was like when I first upgraded from XP and trust me – Vista was never this nippy.
You press on an icon and it leaps into action. Press minimise and it’s out of view quicker than our reviews editor when it’s time for him to buy a round. I can’t remember using any new OS that was this quick.
Even – and I’m still recovering from the shock of this, having used Internet Explorer 8 beta 2 on Vista – even IE8 is fast. Press Ctrl + T and a new tab springs into view as if it’s been sitting there like a coiled tiger, waiting for your command. The pages are rendered just as quickly as Google Chrome. Switching between tabs is instantaneous.
Microsoft hasn’t abandoned the idea of Gadgets with Windows 7, but the Sidebar is gone – in this build at least. As an aside, I don’t have any problem with this, but the Mac OS X implementation of accessing favourite widgets on a hidden layer (activated by a keyboard shortcut or swinging the mouse to the side of the screen) is superior.
Anyway, one of the Gadgets supplied as standard is the CPU and RAM usage monitor, which are both rather cheesy speedo affairs. What’s notable for me, though, is that my processor usage rarely went above 5%, while RAM stayed under 50% no matter what I was doing.
The only downside of all this is that it does make Vista look, well, rubbish. I’ve got precisely no desire to go back to its slightly sluggish interface, with the circular hourglass a constant reminder that I could be doing something far more interesting instead. In short, in terms of performance at least, Windows 7 is exactly what Vista should have been.
The best new feature
As we’ve mentioned elsewhere in the blogs, there are numerous new features and interface tweaks, and I’ll resist the urge to mention them all here. Instead, I’ll focus on just one that I think will make a real difference to people’s usage.
And it’s this: cleverer search .
It doesn’t sound like much – heck, it isn’t much – but it’s now much easier to find the files, programs or services you’re looking for. The fact you could press the Start button, type in “media” and get an immediate shortlist of apps featuring the phrase “media” has always been a superb feature of Vista, and now everything’s much more sensibly categorised.
Say I want to uninstall a program. Typing “uninstall” brings up the options you see here (and they appear near-instantly too). Even “program” will unveil a suitable list of possible tasks, from Programs and Features (the home page for adding and uninstalling programs) to setting your default programs.
Contrast that with Vista, where typing “uninstall” will list all the programs with the name uninstall – not what I was looking for.
Again, you could say this should have been in Vista from the start. And I don’t disagree, it should. But with Windows 7, Microsoft has turned a corner – and it’s this, rather than the charm offensive of its “I’m a PC” adverts, that will help it regain kudos against Linux and Apple.
It’s early days for Windows 7 and me. I only installed it last night, and perhaps my first flush of love will dwindle as I hit problems. I’ll keep you informed, though, as over the coming months I’ll be writing a long-term review of Windows 7 on the blogs.
9 Responses to “ Windows 7: first impressions ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk





























November 5th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
So have you got any hardware that requires drivers not supplied with 7? If so, did you use Vista drivers to get it working, or XP ones? I’ve read conflicting reports on which work best.
November 5th, 2008 at 10:33 pm
I haven’t had a go but I watched an hour demo on it. I really liked the new taskbar although your screenshots don’t show it. I also noticed that it was flying along. It made XP look slow! but it’s nice to have some confirmation on the speed. They seem to be listening. I’ve heard that they will be offering the ‘extras’ such as Windows DVD maker and Windows Photo Gallery as downloads instead of bundling them in the OS. It’s good to know IE is flying along and the demo showed it integrated really well into the new desktop. Shame IE annoyed me by claiming that the Acid3 test was not on it’s list of priorities so I’ve moved back to Firefox
November 5th, 2008 at 11:40 pm
Sorry the review is rubbish, I think the reason for this is because the review is too early so there is nothing to talk about. Thanks for wasting my time.
November 6th, 2008 at 7:44 am
To Alyn Sparkes:
I was at the PC last week when the announced Windows 7, and they made a big deal of saying that Windows 7 shares the same driver model as Windows Vista, so no new drivers would be needed (unlike the switch from Windows XP to Windows Vista).
The reason for this is that Windows 7 isn’t really a new version of Windows, but rather Windows Vista R2 – the kernel has been bumped from v6.0 to v6.1 but the a lot of the underlying parts are the same.
I’m running Windows 7 x64, and using all the same drivers as for my Windows Vista x64 install.
Bear in mind that Win 7 isn’t due for release for 18 months, and the build reviewed here isn’t even at Beta stage, so it’s not unexpected for there to be speed/hardware issues.
One other cool thing they mentioned at PDC (which isn’t mentioned above) is that one of the target goals for Win 7 is to provide a great experience for ultra-portables e.g. the current build only needs 512MB of memory, and they’re trying to reduce this.
November 6th, 2008 at 8:55 am
Matt, you could have wasted less time if you didn’t leave any reply. Hell, it would have wasted less of my time also.
Maybe if your time is so valuable you should manage it better and know what to expect before starting reading, I think it’s obvious that it’s way too early for a real review.
November 7th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
I’d love to know *what* MSFT is doing, to get the Driver-writers to sign their code and force the 64bit issue. Y’no, the mainstream 64bit era started three years ago, and we’re being held back by limitations of 32bit-ness. Sheesh!
January 11th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
got it installed it ,hang on thats vista in another coat.not impressed dual boot went ok, but it took 23 meg on a fresh install (windows 7 64 bit ultimate).well it has all the same problems as vista had “DRIVERS” dindnt like my scanner(epson 4450) woudnt load my intel mobo drivers. and just the same speed to load and shutdown,ah well worth a try so now i will dump it and format my hd
January 11th, 2009 at 10:36 pm
My only real problem with the beta was the large chunky with the large chunky icons (I really didn’t like it being large and chunky), application names removed, making the taskbar more like Mac OSX.
But once I installed it, I was pleasantly surprised to find that this could be changed. By setting it to small icons, the task bar returns to its thin, slender appearence, and application names returned beside their respective icons on the taskbar. Better.
Windows 7 is slick, good looking, and fast as hell.
Loving it. And I really disliked Vista.
April 30th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
Totally agree with this review as I did the exact same thing.
My system lagged like a roasted hog on vista but I thought.. Best not judge 7 before I tried it so I prepared to attack it in one.
Installed it, and from that first log in, I was in complete shock, it ran faster than even XP did on this computer which really fly on here.
Instant driver support, no need to hunt the net for downloads, Brilliant new aero themes (Rather than just the one)
Much better for gaming on here, running very smoothly.
No software issues on here so far either, i’m not going back to vista
The only downside is the horrible taskbar at the bottom, the icons were very mac-like but a simple setting change and it’s all good.
Windows 7 is going to crush vista once released and even XP lovers will turn an eye.
Greg.