Posted on October 8th, 2008 by Matthew Sparkes
No-scratch-otherness: an important buying consideration
I was chatting to a friend last night who happens to purchase and install hundreds of desktops in a very large company, which shall remain nameless. He was explaining just how this particular company, which has hundreds of employees on one site alone, chooses hardware.
It’s not down to budget or hardware, as you might expect – as long as they come in at around £350 they’re fine, he says, for what’s demanded of them, whatever the internal specification. Far more important are the needs of the IT department itself, and that comes down to the shape of the case.
What’s needed is “great stability and no scratch-each-otherness” when piled on top of each other, says my friend. When big bundles of computers come in they’re piled up on a desk where they’re given a standard disk image, transferred to a trolley and taken all over the site to users. Most cases don’t stand up well to this abuse, but he’s found one that does, and it has become the backbone of the organisation, all because of its “no scratch-each-otherness”.
It’s interesting that buying decisions can be made on the basis of something manufacturers may never have considered.
Tags: cases, pc, procurement
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
3 Responses to “ No-scratch-otherness: an important buying consideration ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement


October 8th, 2008 at 12:21 pm
Robustness of the case was also, usually, a factor when purchasing. They get moved around, stacked up, dumped in a corner etc. a lot, so something that is cool and shiny, but scratches or damages easy is a total no-no.
October 11th, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Where I work (a school) size and shape of the boxes our quite a big concern.
Last year we replaced all the computers in one of our IT rooms and purchased pc with cheap cases that looked square (like shuttle shape and size) on the website. We then discovered that the cases are in fact ginormous. So they’re currently stacked in columns of 2 but the kids keep sliding the top one around and half off the bottom one!
Also the power button is not very robust and a few have been half pushed in.
Maybe you should review business desktops and take robustness and scratyness into account!
October 26th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
What was the case? I was quite surprised to find that the IT dept at my new job builds all the office’s PCs itself – and in Antec Sonata cases no less.