Posted on September 24th, 2008 by Matthew Sparkes
China: no source code, no sales
China is apparently considering demanding source code from hardware manufacturers, and banning the sale of products from companies that don’t comply. It’s being called an “obligatory accreditation system for IT security products,” but to me it sounds more like a worrying ultimatum.
This would be a drastic move for any Government, but manufacturers are extremely worried about giving such information to China in particular because of its, shall we say, lax attitude to copyright and patent law. In fact, MI5 has even gone so far as to warn UK companies in the past about the threat of Chinese hackers going after trade secrets.
Many products available for sale in the country bear a striking resemblance to Western products, and lawsuits have been filed in the past with varying levels of success, so tight security seems to be a better method of protecting IP than litigation. Under the new rules this strategy could be impossible.
The implications of this are bigger than you may think. On my recent trip to Korea to visit Samsung I was surprised to find out that a lot of consumer devices are physically identical. Samsung makes the same panels for its own televisions as it does under licence for Sony, for example, but the software that controls it is proprietary, and accounts for a lot of the picture quality. The code is far more sensitive than the hardware.
Tags: china, code, import, Software, source
Posted in: Newsdesk
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
5 Responses to “ China: no source code, no sales ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement



September 24th, 2008 at 8:12 pm
Manufactures have long used identical kit. I can recall a few years ago that Sony’s DVD RW drives were mane by Liteon. The only difference being the firmware and the price. Sony’s were roughly twice the price.
September 24th, 2008 at 8:19 pm
Would this be the most apt moment to use that teen phrase “owned”? I’ve no idea.
but the two words of note in this article are “apparently considering” meaning they haven’t done it yet and that leaves foreign investors a window to take advantage of. One on a tall building may come to mind – but their are always sales abroad that may help them survive, and surely other governments should be applying pressure, forget M$ though.
September 24th, 2008 at 10:32 pm
There’s a big difference between a company like Lite-On making drives for other companies to put their branding on, and a Chinese firm reverse-engineering or stealing the source code of a product to produce identical, cheaper copies. One is a common legal contract, the other is theft.
September 25th, 2008 at 10:03 am
I know someone whose company makes big expensive machines. They are sold all around the world, but there are certain countries they they refuse to sell to.
He told me “If we sell a machine to China, they pay OK, but it would be the only machine we’d ever sell there. After that, they’d just make copies”.
But we were like that once. And the US was like that once. I’d imagine China (and others) will start to play ball far faster than most of the West ever did.
P.
February 25th, 2010 at 12:09 pm
business for sale abroad…
I enjoyed reading your work! GREAT post! I looked around for this… but I found you!…