Posted on September 23rd, 2008 by Stuart Turton
Privacy, mobiles and my nan
My nan hated mobile phones. Just taking one into her living room was enough to invite her rambling wrath, invetiably finished off with being called love in a tone that was more hand grenade than full stop.
In my nan’s mind a mobile phone was basically a cancer wand, the merest waft of which could kill a man stone dead. If she was feeling particularly vitriolic on the subject, she would then claim Doris next-door (which I genuinely believed was her full name until I was twelve or so) knew somebody who’d gone deaf using one, before delivering the coup de grace – a stunning exposition on how my mobile phone was pretty much everything that was wrong with the modern world, bar Genocide and Carrot and Coriander soup.
As you may have gathered my nan was no great loss to the world of reasoned debate, but that doesn’t mean she wasn’t right. To my nan, and I suspect the majority of her generation, privacy meant something else entirely to what it does now. It meant keeping your problems in house, no matter what. Family problems never got much further than the living room, though they probably drifted into the back garden and over the fence on occasion.
My nan never understood how we could so willingly take our troubles onto the street and discuss them on a mobile phone at the top of our voice, where any old stranger could hear them. It didn’t matter whether they would care, only that they would hear. And, the older I get, the more I think she’s right.
We all throw our hands up in the air and try to look horrified when Facebook or Phorm drifts anywhere near our personal details, but ten minutes on Oxford Street and I’m an intimate of so many lives that 20 minutes rooting around their sock drawer couldn’t reveal anymore about them. Take my journey this morning, and the girl who’s thinking about breaking up with her boyfriend because “J” has finally “made a move”. If anybody wants to meet her she’ll be meeting the mysterious “J” at a bar in Fulham on Friday. The night will be “wicked, innit”. Or how about the woman in Tesco who’s not heard back from her tenant in three weeks, and is heading over there to bang on the door. It’s the “Islington one” apparently.
I don’t understand how we can these wave these facts of our lives before us like incense on a daily basis, then claim to be so outraged when Phorm et al come sniffing around our browsing history. A part of me suspects that if Web 2.0 had been foisted on my nan’s generation, we wouldn’t have had any of these troubles. Facebook profiles would have been left blank, MySpace pages would gather dust and searches treated with so much suspision the entire concept would have died an almost immediate death.
Maybe it’s time we revisited the idea of privacy as a whole. Not just online, but in our real lives, too. If something’s really that important to one aspect of our lives, surely it must that important to the whole.
Tags: mobile phones, privacy
Posted in: Rant
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
5 Responses to “ Privacy, mobiles and my nan ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk





























September 23rd, 2008 at 3:39 pm
I think its fair to say, you only discover the true value of your privacy after you lose it.
The younger you are, the less experience of losing your privacy you have. Older people may not understand the technology (though many do!) but they certainly recognise the value of their personal privacy.
And just because some people don’t care, doesn’t mean everyone doesn’t care. I’m sure you’d find even the charmless people you overheard in the street bawling at their phones, would be worried to think someone was taking detailed notes and publishing them online.
If not, they will find out soon. And then their view of the value of privacy might change.
September 23rd, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Stuart Turton are you stupid?
are you honestly suggesting that deep packet inspection, ie: the interception of broadband communication to build a profile of someone is akin to earwigging other peoples private conversations.
well I suppose it would be if you recorded their activity & communications, built profiles of them (giving each profile its own random but unique name) and then sold those records on to advertisers.
its unscrupulous, immoral and illegal.
the legal fight is not over, its only just begun.
September 24th, 2008 at 9:51 am
I sat on a train to Birmingham yesterday, and overheard four suited types discussing pre stock exchange announcement news for their (fairly well known) company which will almost certainly affect their share price.
At least I hope it does.
I wonder what the extent of this outsider-trading really is. I’m sure I’m not alone in finding myself in this situation.
September 24th, 2008 at 11:07 am
The difference is that the people on the phone chose to talk in public, having assessed that the risks were low. Whereas Phorm is foisted on the customer who previously had a reasonable expectation that the communication would not be intercepted.
October 8th, 2009 at 9:39 am
Nice greet information
Best regards.
http://www.mobile-phone.pk