Posted on September 2nd, 2008 by Darien Graham-Smith
Chrome and the multi-core cloud
The constantly-evolving nature of technology is, for me, a source of endless fascination — and frequent amusement when it catches us off guard.
Just last night, our own Dear Leader was on the radio talking about Microsoft’s latest salvo in the browser wars. This morning, the battlefield has changed completely, thanks to the surprise arrival of Google Chrome.
To be precise, Chrome isn’t here quite yet: the beta is due out later today. For now, I’ve had to content myself with reading the product notes, which Google has oddly elected to release in cartoon form. Cute, but hardly practical.
Still, it looks like a lot of good ideas have gone into Chrome, and there’s one idea that excites me in particular:

As I say, we’re still waiting for the beta, so we don’t yet know how this works in practice. But running each tab, and each extension, as an independent process should, in theory, enable Chrome to make very effective use of multiple CPU cores.
Thus, not only is Google set to shake up the browser wars; it could actually make “cloud” computing as stable, efficient and responsive as local software – or more so in many scenarios. That would set the scene for a revolution in our very model of personal computing.
Of course, for now this is all just speculation. But even without seeing the software, I can confidently say this much: Google hasn’t lost its knack for disrupting the market.
Tags: Chrome, cloud, Google, multi-threading, Web
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
6 Responses to “ Chrome and the multi-core cloud ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk





























September 2nd, 2008 at 10:34 am
But will it offer any improvement for someone using a single core processor?
September 2nd, 2008 at 1:54 pm
It should offer increased stability, if a single page causes the rendering engine, javascript engine, plug-in etc. to go rouge… It apparently goes back to the old days of the Mac OS and gives the tab a “sad tab” face and kills the process…
A case of wait and see, I guess, as to how well that functions in practice.
September 2nd, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Good summary, cheers!
September 2nd, 2008 at 4:34 pm
“Each having its own memory and its own copy of the global data structures.” And using up more memory with its multiple copies.
It’s not currently possible to view more than one tab at a time, so all those other processes should be idle. I fail to see the performance advantage, although stability is useful.
September 2nd, 2008 at 10:00 pm
Downloaded and installed w/o any problems.
Some very nice features and, on my system, VERY FAST loading pages. About the same as FF 3.0.1
Very well documented!
Lots of Help pages.
But the problem google is going to have against FF is the lack of add ons for now.
Add ons and extensions are very valuable to me, so while Chrome is nice, and fast, it lacks what I like in a browser.
September 3rd, 2008 at 4:25 pm
To take advantage of multiple cores, an app simply needs to be multi-threaded.