<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Polaroid successor on the way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/08/13/digital-polaroid-successor-on-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/08/13/digital-polaroid-successor-on-the-way/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gindylow</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/08/13/digital-polaroid-successor-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-6078</link>
		<dc:creator>Gindylow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2850#comment-6078</guid>
		<description>Ah but only becasue you cant buy style and quality like this so easily these days.

There&#039;s still a market for the exisiting Polaroid Analogue / Film devices, but the only let down is how much the refills cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah but only becasue you cant buy style and quality like this so easily these days.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s still a market for the exisiting Polaroid Analogue / Film devices, but the only let down is how much the refills cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

