<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not so Cuil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/08/12/not-so-cuil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/08/12/not-so-cuil/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/08/12/not-so-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-5397</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2847#comment-5397</guid>
		<description>Well, I gave your site the same search string (&quot;lotus notes mail rules&quot;) and the second link was mildly useful, the fourth came from the authoritative source (the IBM Developer resource) - but that dire page of pointless gripes is still on the first page!

I&#039;m sure it&#039;s algorithmically hard to evaluate the relevance of a technical source: but this is bad news for abstract researchers - and I should add, good news for analysts like me. We still have a use...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I gave your site the same search string (&#8221;lotus notes mail rules&#8221;) and the second link was mildly useful, the fourth came from the authoritative source (the IBM Developer resource) &#8211; but that dire page of pointless gripes is still on the first page!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s algorithmically hard to evaluate the relevance of a technical source: but this is bad news for abstract researchers &#8211; and I should add, good news for analysts like me. We still have a use&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/08/12/not-so-cuil/comment-page-1/#comment-5328</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2847#comment-5328</guid>
		<description>Cuil is definitely going for it, but it&#039;s hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google&#039;s done. And even that would take years of effort.

Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It&#039;s in alpha, but I&#039;d be curious to hear your thoughts. http://me.dium.com/search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuil is definitely going for it, but it&#8217;s hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google&#8217;s done. And even that would take years of effort.</p>
<p>Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It&#8217;s in alpha, but I&#8217;d be curious to hear your thoughts. <a href="http://me.dium.com/search" rel="nofollow">http://me.dium.com/search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

