Comments on: Computeractive flatters to deceive?

By: Nigel Bullivant

Nigel Bullivant — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:30:24 +0000

boring. pointless story

By: James Barry

James Barry — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:35:34 +0000

I agree with Yaytay, the PC Pro cover is nonsensical – where are the 6 additional lines going on the connector on the right? and there’s something fishy going on with the connector on the left too. If you want to call yourself a professional PC mag – PLEASE get the basics right first.
And is that your second *news* story this month trying to sell the latest issue? Things must be getting desperate.
James

By: Yaytay

Yaytay — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:03:00 +0000

I have to say that the ComputerActive one is better.
I was always really put off by that PC Pro cover because the connections on it are entirely random and illogical.
One has 15 lines, the other 5, but both have 9 pins on the connector.