Posted on July 31st, 2008 by Darien Graham-Smith
Mojave, same problems
This week in the office we’ve been talking a lot about Microsoft’s Mojave Experiment. In case you missed it, this is Redmond’s new attempt to dispel negative perceptions of Vista. The central claim is that “people would like Vista if they could only see it for themselves.”
And, in fairness, the experiment does show that people do like Vista, so long as they can only see it. There’s no indication of how they feel once they actually start using it, which is probably for the best.
But though the experiment may be very limited in scope, Microsoft has gone to town in documenting it. The site contains fifty-five short videos. They can’t seriously think anyone’s going to watch them all. Even I couldn’t sit through more than two thirds of them, and it’s my job to keep up with this kind of stuff. I suspect the intention is simply to impress you with the sheer weight of evidence they’ve gathered.
But as I was watching the thirtieth of these films, I found myself wondering: what might have been achieved if the time and money expended in producing all these little adverts had instead been channelled into actually improving Vista?
Fixing Vista
Admittedly, the most common complaint against Vista is its hunger for system resources, and it’s unrealistic to think Microsoft could fix that without some major re-engineering.
But to be honest, it’s not the system footprint that made me ditch Vista and go back to XP. RAM’s cheap, and hard disk space is cheaper. Hell, I welcome excuses to upgrade my PC.
What put me off was the niggles – the stupid design decisions, the things changed for the sake of change. The worthless and obtrusive Network and Sharing Centre. The arbitrarily renamed and reorganised Control Panel. The unhelpful way the display settings have been split up into separate dialogues. The bewildering shut-down options. The pointless security requesters.
That and, of course, the slow file-copy problem that’s made Vista all but unusable on some LANs for eighteen months now. I actually asked a Microsoft representative outright why the hell they couldn’t make Vista copy files as quickly as XP. His response: “There’s no problem with Vista. Perhaps you need to get your router manufacturer to fix their IPv6 drivers.”
Broken as designed
These are all problems that could be fixed in a matter of weeks if Microsoft chose to address them. And if it did, I’d probably go straight back to Vista. After all, it has numerous features that I do like: favourite links, fast search, Previous Versions, pervasive thumbnailing… hell, I even miss the little globe that shows when you’re connected to the internet. I want it all – I just want it all in a slightly more usable package.
Unfortunately, Microsoft seems determined not to give me that. Eighteen months of updates (including a full service pack) have brought endless under-the-bonnet fixes, but not a single update to the outward-facing parts of the OS that directly affect everyday users. It’s as if the company simply can’t admit that its “easiest Windows ever” might benefit from a little streamlining.
At least Microsoft is now acknowledging, in general terms, that Vista has acquired a disastrous reputation. That’s a positive development. But its response to the bad news is anything but encouraging: the Mojave Experiment isn’t intended to address users’ criticisms, but to discredit them.
The message is clear: our product’s fine. We just need to fix all you ignorant users.
4 Responses to “ Mojave, same problems ”
Leave a Reply
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
Authors
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk





























July 31st, 2008 at 9:14 pm
Is the painfully slow copying/moving/deleting issue fixed?
Oh, thought not.
Game over Microshaft!
July 31st, 2008 at 9:39 pm
I thought I would do a quick Q & A on this:
Q. Do I consider myself an IT professional
A. Yes
Q. Do I use Vista
A. No
Q. Would I recommend Vista?
A. Only if I wanted to be as popular as Gordon Brown
Q. Why, why, why did Microsoft release an OS which is slower at its most critical function – Networking????
A. Because of money!
Q. Will I skip Vista and wait for Windows 7?
A. Absolutley
August 1st, 2008 at 9:59 pm
Why purchase a huge bundle of what can only be described as SpyWare?
Why purchase a huge bundle of Bells and Whistles?
Even XP could not configure correctly my printers.
Nor would it let me load my old software.
Thank God I only had it on trial and gave the system back.
For Heavens Sake, will some other company that’s not as expensive as Apple come up with some decent, fast running, reliable, no crashing, Software?
September 19th, 2008 at 10:16 am
“…stupid design decisions, the things changed for the sake of change. The worthless and obtrusive Network and Sharing Centre. ….The unhelpful way the display settings have been split up into separate dialogues. ”
Here ruddy here! It’s a complete mess. Why oh why did they split up those dialogues? If they’d amalgamated all of the settings on to one page, fair enough, but no! The same damned things are still there!
I’d really like to know why it uses up 13gb of my disk space. It seems as if instead of Microsoft realising I just want to get on and use the programmes I want to, it wants me to use all of it’s rubbish. That’s a fine assumption, but I don’t want to. I want a simple OS that just does as it’s told. Heck, I can’t even permanently delete the blasted folders under my user account!
An easy way to summarise Vista, it’s the opposite of Chrome. Bloated, messy and clumsy.