Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on July 31st, 2008 by David Bayon

Hating BitTorrent (or How To Spoil Three Years of Anticipation)

Like Napster and every other file sharing service since, BitTorrent has altered (some would say scarred) the digital landscape immensely. I’m not going to go into the legalities here – we all know people who use it, a noble few for genuine legal file sharing, vastly more for getting the latest Coldplay album without having to shell out for it (I’ve heard it, I can sympathise).

It’s part cause and part by-product of the fact that the Internet has hugely magnified the hype and speculation around new albums, movies and games, to the extent where we often know far more than we need to about something before we experience it.

Simon over at fanboy site Den Of Geek makes the point well here, with even seemingly innocent Facebook walls proving a minefield before a much anticipated film release. I can understand this to a certain extent – I read previews and speculate about films more than is really healthy. But I stop there.

The people I simply won’t ever understand are those seemingly intent on deliberately ruining their own enjoyment of the thing they’re so desperate to get hold of. I’m talking about the pre-release hounds, feeding on dodgy leaked movies and unfinalised games. Why? Just, why?

There’s an interesting interview here with SCEE President David Reeves, in which he drops his guard for a moment and comments honestly about the scourge of BitTorrent, particularly with regard to a company like Sony which often staggers releases across different regions. I quote:

“We are a PAL market and we are going to do it in PAL and we are going to do it properly, you can wait for it and you can have it in good quality, you know you can get the stuff from Bittorrent if you want to and download PSP games, it’s up to you.”

Aside from the fact that it’s so refreshing to hear a high-level Sony executive acknowledging that people are going to use BitTorrent and there ain’t much anyone can do about it, it’s the tone of his quote that really hit home.

In essence he’s saying, yes you can download the dodgy leaked version before it’s ready, but why on Earth would you want to? If you’ve waited so expectantly for a game or movie that’s going to knock your socks off, why don’t you want to savour it in all its glory, rather than seeing it as filmed by a bloke in the back row with a handycam?

A quick check of one popular torrent portal gives a depressing chart of the current top searches, with cracked copies of Wanted, the new Mummy film, Hancock, and even PSP games – the subject of Reeves’ resigned comments. But the worst is at number three.

The Joker

Why why why oh why would anyone in their right mind wait three long and tense years for The Dark Knight to finally arrive – a film so mindblowingly perfect that scenes are still hurtling round my head days after witnessing it – only to download a dodgy copy to watch on a laptop? Whether it has the back of someone’s head in view for the duration is irrelevant – I doubt its $180 million budget was spent to be watched at 1,280 x 800 while you’re on the lav.

I can just about begin to understand some of the reasons behind it. Yes, the cinema is increasingly expensive, and bafflingly few people seem capable of holding their bladder for two and a half hours these days. And games that arrive across the pond months before they do so here can be infuriating when reviews are gushing with praise.

But the popular argument that these people then go on to buy a ticket or a copy of the DVD upon release just doesn’t cut it for me. You only get one first time. Rewatching a film when it then arrives in the cinema won’t let you unlearn the plot twists, and you’ll never get the same exhileration as the first time you sat in a crowded cinema and saw Batman turn his [SPOILER REMOVED] into a [SPOILER REMOVED] before [SPOILER REMOVED] into [SPOILER REMOVED] all in glorious HD. (See, I’m better than that.)

It’s like watching Match of the Day when you already know the results – you may as well just fast-forward to the goals.

But it’s human nature that some people would rather be the one to spoil the plot twists for others than to actually enjoy them for themselves, and the great shame is that innovations like BitTorrent have, unfortunately, given any spotty oik the means to do it.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in: Rant

Permalink | Trackback

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Social Bookmark this article: What is this?

8 Responses to “ Hating BitTorrent (or How To Spoil Three Years of Anticipation) ”

  1. pcernie Says:
    July 31st, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    I agree, a copy is watchable if the quality hasn’t dropped too much, but usually there’s absolutely no point.

    Regarding TDK, amazing film but there were a few plot holes if my brain remembers correctly (a dense film in content terms). Remaining spoiler-free, on receiving info on a character’s whereabouts, does Gordon actually send anyone there?

    I hope someone knows what I mean by that lol, and if you’re gonna reply make it yes or no so as not to ruin the film for others please, thanks!

     
  2. pcernie Says:
    July 31st, 2008 at 2:38 pm

    ‘bafflingly few people seem capable of holding their bladder for two and a half hours these days’

    Yeah, I could slap the people who get up in the middle of a film, it’s f*cking annoying for all concerned! Then they come back and ask the person beside them what happened!

    When I went to see TDK there was even a tw@t who kept getting his incredibly bright mobile phone out to check the time and tell his mates!

    Sometimes I think there should be an etiquette test before you go into the screening…

     
  3. Rowan Parker Says:
    July 31st, 2008 at 5:23 pm

    You make this sound like its BitTorrent’s fault. They just made a decent piece of software which got abused. But you’re giving it hard light. What about all those Linux distro’s one can download? It shouldn’t be the software you hate, more the people who use it illegally.

     
  4. David Staples Says:
    August 1st, 2008 at 9:52 am

    “all in glorious HD”.

    I must be going to the wrong cinemas, all I see is a slightly blurry, grainy, washed out pic.

    Dark Knights wasn’t that great IMO either.

     
  5. NellieIrrelevant Says:
    August 1st, 2008 at 10:28 am

    I always wonder why anti-piracy ads miss this point about poor image and sound quality. it’s the only thing that really makes a difference to the viewer experience between genuine and ropey pirate versions. The ads should point out that people who buy dodgy dvds end up watching blurry washed out crap with rubbish sound. Of course that will only have an effect if cinemas ensure their projections standards are far better than what punters can manage at home – which a few I can think of don’t…

     
  6. Peter Lanado Says:
    August 1st, 2008 at 11:35 am

    People who watch “non-licensed” copy material probably end up doing it to see how good or crap a film’s going to be. Just becuase a bunch of self-appointed film critics loves something, or a film’s hyped-up to the rafters; it doesn’t mean you have to be Lemmingdreamus, or Sheppy2000.

    And like many others, bored of paying very good money to see a whole heap of Afghan Viagras, that shouldn’t have made it out of the cutting room booth let alone anywhere near a big screen; if it’s a good to fantastic film, you don’t mind having it “spoiled”. You can then take a trip to the cinema and experience it in full sparkling washaround just as it was meant to be, and enjoy the experience even more.

    If it’s a load of zoo manure, and I haven’t seen a little preview, then who do I complain to and get my money back when it’s been a very unsatisfactory experience.

    And before anyone says, ‘bad person’, I have after watching those little spoilers not only gone to the cinema, but also waited eagerly for the DVD release, to purchase and watch all over again, in all it’s glory without screaming children, someone chatting on the mobile, or unsatisfactory smells wafting all the way along my olfactory nerves.

     
  7. David Bayon Says:
    August 1st, 2008 at 11:55 am

    Peter, surely going to the cinema without knowing exactly what you’re going to think of the film is half the appeal. I go every week, sometiimes it’s a corker (I was amazed to find myself enjoying Wanted), other times it’s a lame duck (Hancock springs to mind). But in both cases it gave plenty to dissect and discuss afterwards in the pub.

    The cinema is a social activity, and the aftermath is a huge part of that. Walking back into the sunlight and overhearing people’s wildly differing views on the same two hours of film is precisely why I agree with you that you shouldn’t blindly follow critics.

    But ignoring the critics in favour of your own “spoilers” (what does that actually mean? Do you download the whole film and just watch the first five minutes? Skip to the action scenes? The whole thing?) is just as bad in my opinion.

    Just enjoy a film for what it is, in the environment it was meant to be seen. Like it or loathe it, at least you can then judge it fairly.

     
  8. Stuart Turton Says:
    August 1st, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    I agree with Mr Bayon for the first time ever. Downloading a dodgy copy of a film is an entirely different experience to downloading an album. I can understand downloading music, and the argument that if you like it, you then go and buy it. You’re not losing anything by doing so. But a movie really is an entirely different experience at the cinema – especially if the sound and picture quality of your copy is bad. And most movies simply aren’t meant to be watched more than once, unlike albums which you’ll probably listen to twenty or thirty times over.

    I’m not actually a movie fan and didn’t enjoy the Dark Knight that much, but I appreciated the cinema “experience”, which as Dave says is a social thing. It’s good to leave the cinema, go the pub and argue with your mates about what you’ve just seen. If you’ve already done that by the time you get to the cinema, you’re cutting out a very large part of the fun.

    Right, agreeing with Dave makes me feel dirty all over. I’m off to shower this complicity off.

     

Leave a Reply

* required fields

* Will not be published

Categories

Authors

Archives

advertisement

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008