<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you want from Windows 7?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: imobi</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-24230</link>
		<dc:creator>imobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-24230</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;hello...&lt;/strong&gt;

usefull...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>hello&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>usefull&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affordable Linux Web hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-15177</link>
		<dc:creator>Affordable Linux Web hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-15177</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Linux Vs. Windows...&lt;/strong&gt;

While both offer more affordable web hosting platforms for Web service, Linux and Windows are polar opposites on almost every other level. They look different, run differently, support different software, and cost money in different places...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Linux Vs. Windows&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>While both offer more affordable web hosting platforms for Web service, Linux and Windows are polar opposites on almost every other level. They look different, run differently, support different software, and cost money in different places&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xghost</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>xghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>This is my I want dont want list. This is not a rant, but I&#039;ll clearly mark some &#039;wants&#039; and &quot;don&#039;t&quot; s in the list.

1. I DONT want DRM or any DRM-related technologies. I want the PC to do what I tell it to do, not what MS tells it to do.

2. I DONT want compatibility problems with software in previous versions

3. I DONT want compatibility problems with hardware (Creative Sound Cards with Vista anyone? They had to develop Alchemy because of it)

4. I DONT want any tricks. I DONT want OpenGL hardware acceleration to be poorly implemented as in other versions of Windows, in order to favor Direct3D.

5. I DONT want a bloated OS that takes an eternity to load, even in a high-end gaming rig.

6. I DONT want the OS to practically FORCE the user to into buying a mid-range gaming machine JUST to install and run the OS&#039;s basic features.

7. I DONT want 20,000 different versions of the same OS. That approach is not consumer friendly as it tends to confuse some people that may not be as versed in software-related areas. Release 1 (ONE) version of the software. A full-featured one.

8. I WANT a better disk defragmentation tool, and I want it to defrag my disk even if the OS *THINKS* that it should not be defragmented. Who the hell told Vista that to have, and even enforce, its own opinion anyways? Software with an attitude...now thats a joke...

9. I WANT MORE control of the OS given to the USER and NOT to the OS. It IS the USER&#039;s PC after all.

10. I WANT a Stable, Robust, and Secure OS. I DONT want to loose my liberties in the process.

11. I WANT my Fair Use Rights to be upheld. Users DO have a LEGAL right to backup their software WITHOUT DRM-related intrusions and obstacles.

12. I DONT want a Bloated Kernel.

13. . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my I want dont want list. This is not a rant, but I&#8217;ll clearly mark some &#8216;wants&#8217; and &#8220;don&#8217;t&#8221; s in the list.</p>
<p>1. I DONT want DRM or any DRM-related technologies. I want the PC to do what I tell it to do, not what MS tells it to do.</p>
<p>2. I DONT want compatibility problems with software in previous versions</p>
<p>3. I DONT want compatibility problems with hardware (Creative Sound Cards with Vista anyone? They had to develop Alchemy because of it)</p>
<p>4. I DONT want any tricks. I DONT want OpenGL hardware acceleration to be poorly implemented as in other versions of Windows, in order to favor Direct3D.</p>
<p>5. I DONT want a bloated OS that takes an eternity to load, even in a high-end gaming rig.</p>
<p>6. I DONT want the OS to practically FORCE the user to into buying a mid-range gaming machine JUST to install and run the OS&#8217;s basic features.</p>
<p>7. I DONT want 20,000 different versions of the same OS. That approach is not consumer friendly as it tends to confuse some people that may not be as versed in software-related areas. Release 1 (ONE) version of the software. A full-featured one.</p>
<p>8. I WANT a better disk defragmentation tool, and I want it to defrag my disk even if the OS *THINKS* that it should not be defragmented. Who the hell told Vista that to have, and even enforce, its own opinion anyways? Software with an attitude&#8230;now thats a joke&#8230;</p>
<p>9. I WANT MORE control of the OS given to the USER and NOT to the OS. It IS the USER&#8217;s PC after all.</p>
<p>10. I WANT a Stable, Robust, and Secure OS. I DONT want to loose my liberties in the process.</p>
<p>11. I WANT my Fair Use Rights to be upheld. Users DO have a LEGAL right to backup their software WITHOUT DRM-related intrusions and obstacles.</p>
<p>12. I DONT want a Bloated Kernel.</p>
<p>13. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-4743</guid>
		<description>A quick reply to Nox who says that games are stopping him from ditching Microsoft: check out Cedega.  With Cegega installed under GNU/Linux you can play all your Windows games and still have the benefit of a decent OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick reply to Nox who says that games are stopping him from ditching Microsoft: check out Cedega.  With Cegega installed under GNU/Linux you can play all your Windows games and still have the benefit of a decent OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher John Bridgman (alias Guidewell)</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4704</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher John Bridgman (alias Guidewell)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-4704</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not so much a Windows feature as an overhaul of Live Search that I&#039;m looking for.  At present you can only search in all engines for text.  It&#039;s about time we could search on pictures.  For eample, if you find a thumbnail in an e-mail you might want the original pic5ture.  Or you might want the link to lead to text.  for example, recentl I had an e-mail with a thumbnail representing a movie project but there was no URL along with it.  Taking the picture into a package that would enlarge and sharpen it Istill could not read the text in the image which might have led me to the web site.  If I could have searched for a match to this picture I could have found my way to the place.

My wife is a trained information scientiset and llibrarian. She tells me that in her undergraduate days one of her lecturers illustrated the sort of problems tht public library staff get with the Henry VIII question.  IAparently the most common inquiry in public libraries is a teacher asking for books on history.  What they are really looking for is a picture of Henry but they don&#039;t like to ask the direct question; they think that if they hit on the right book on Tudor history they can soon find one.  So it would make sense on a search engine that if you searched or a picture of Henry VIII you ought to come up with a link to a picture rather than one to text.

So how about it?  Microsoft could ce3ertainly steal a march on Gogle, Yahoo and the others bu including picture search facilities as I have outlined above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not so much a Windows feature as an overhaul of Live Search that I&#8217;m looking for.  At present you can only search in all engines for text.  It&#8217;s about time we could search on pictures.  For eample, if you find a thumbnail in an e-mail you might want the original pic5ture.  Or you might want the link to lead to text.  for example, recentl I had an e-mail with a thumbnail representing a movie project but there was no URL along with it.  Taking the picture into a package that would enlarge and sharpen it Istill could not read the text in the image which might have led me to the web site.  If I could have searched for a match to this picture I could have found my way to the place.</p>
<p>My wife is a trained information scientiset and llibrarian. She tells me that in her undergraduate days one of her lecturers illustrated the sort of problems tht public library staff get with the Henry VIII question.  IAparently the most common inquiry in public libraries is a teacher asking for books on history.  What they are really looking for is a picture of Henry but they don&#8217;t like to ask the direct question; they think that if they hit on the right book on Tudor history they can soon find one.  So it would make sense on a search engine that if you searched or a picture of Henry VIII you ought to come up with a link to a picture rather than one to text.</p>
<p>So how about it?  Microsoft could ce3ertainly steal a march on Gogle, Yahoo and the others bu including picture search facilities as I have outlined above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4671</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-4671</guid>
		<description>I want a OS with a free anti virus or with no hassle of viruses! It&#039;s Microsofts fault their software is not up to scratch so why make us pay for it?

Also I would like all the features back from windows longhorn..the way it was supposed to be before they ran out of time!

Faster Startup: Only load the essentials needed to start windows raw, like in safe mode, and load the things that the user needs every time, but for things run rarely, run them on load of the program!

Give options to turn features off in the OS easily!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a OS with a free anti virus or with no hassle of viruses! It&#8217;s Microsofts fault their software is not up to scratch so why make us pay for it?</p>
<p>Also I would like all the features back from windows longhorn..the way it was supposed to be before they ran out of time!</p>
<p>Faster Startup: Only load the essentials needed to start windows raw, like in safe mode, and load the things that the user needs every time, but for things run rarely, run them on load of the program!</p>
<p>Give options to turn features off in the OS easily!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nox</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4578</link>
		<dc:creator>Nox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-4578</guid>
		<description>1. Stable - The OS must be able to protect itself from instability. Many of our unix servers have been up for many months if not a year or two without fault.

2. Fast - Only load when required (OLWR). Extra daemons and services shouldn&#039;t be loaded at startup, waiting years for something to do.

3. Faster boot up - Don&#039;t load everything on boot up - its taking far too long. Shutdown ain&#039;t great either. The Mac OS X is very fast at both.

4. Secure - Make it bullet proof - well as best you can.

5. 64 bit - Anything else will divert resources - esp. regarding drivers. We need more memory not less.

6. Drivers - Signed drivers should be mandatory. Again, this will push resources into getting things done right. Many, hardware vendors leave the drivers as after thoughts - this must change.

7. Documents and settings - dump this and setup as  /user/username/documents etc

8. A task bar that can span muliple monitors.

9. Modular OS - In the unix world each utility does only one thing but very well.

10. Bloatware - Keep this, but during install allow users to choose. Allow easy uninstall latter also. I don&#039;t realy want to go back to the old days of not being able to click on a ubiquitous file and not to be able to atleast preveiw it.

11. Watch out Windows - Linux (I tried Ubuntu), seemed to do everything I wanted - and very well too. The only reason I haven&#039;t abandoned Windows entirely is for games.

12. Standards compliance - Don&#039;t go off into your own world like IE. Keep the standards - MS is no longer bigger than the game itself.

Thats enough to be getting on with. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Stable &#8211; The OS must be able to protect itself from instability. Many of our unix servers have been up for many months if not a year or two without fault.</p>
<p>2. Fast &#8211; Only load when required (OLWR). Extra daemons and services shouldn&#8217;t be loaded at startup, waiting years for something to do.</p>
<p>3. Faster boot up &#8211; Don&#8217;t load everything on boot up &#8211; its taking far too long. Shutdown ain&#8217;t great either. The Mac OS X is very fast at both.</p>
<p>4. Secure &#8211; Make it bullet proof &#8211; well as best you can.</p>
<p>5. 64 bit &#8211; Anything else will divert resources &#8211; esp. regarding drivers. We need more memory not less.</p>
<p>6. Drivers &#8211; Signed drivers should be mandatory. Again, this will push resources into getting things done right. Many, hardware vendors leave the drivers as after thoughts &#8211; this must change.</p>
<p>7. Documents and settings &#8211; dump this and setup as  /user/username/documents etc</p>
<p>8. A task bar that can span muliple monitors.</p>
<p>9. Modular OS &#8211; In the unix world each utility does only one thing but very well.</p>
<p>10. Bloatware &#8211; Keep this, but during install allow users to choose. Allow easy uninstall latter also. I don&#8217;t realy want to go back to the old days of not being able to click on a ubiquitous file and not to be able to atleast preveiw it.</p>
<p>11. Watch out Windows &#8211; Linux (I tried Ubuntu), seemed to do everything I wanted &#8211; and very well too. The only reason I haven&#8217;t abandoned Windows entirely is for games.</p>
<p>12. Standards compliance &#8211; Don&#8217;t go off into your own world like IE. Keep the standards &#8211; MS is no longer bigger than the game itself.</p>
<p>Thats enough to be getting on with. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4560</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-4560</guid>
		<description>By the way, site master, your clock is an hour out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, site master, your clock is an hour out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4554</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-4554</guid>
		<description>Cut out all of the fancy pretty screen cluttering resource hogging time wasting bloatware.  
I do NOT want aero. I don&#039;t want any gadgets on my screen. 
i DO want a fast, secure, straight forward, UK English operating system that is compatible with what I use every day at work.
I don&#039;t want a Mac - if I did i would buy one.
Vista came pre-installed on my laptop and I have pared it down so it is almost as fast as XP on my desktop.  I&#039;m not at all tempted to upgrade my desktop to Vista,  quite the contrary - if I could get XP on my laptop i would have done so by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cut out all of the fancy pretty screen cluttering resource hogging time wasting bloatware.<br />
I do NOT want aero. I don&#8217;t want any gadgets on my screen.<br />
i DO want a fast, secure, straight forward, UK English operating system that is compatible with what I use every day at work.<br />
I don&#8217;t want a Mac &#8211; if I did i would buy one.<br />
Vista came pre-installed on my laptop and I have pared it down so it is almost as fast as XP on my desktop.  I&#8217;m not at all tempted to upgrade my desktop to Vista,  quite the contrary &#8211; if I could get XP on my laptop i would have done so by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/29/what-do-you-want-from-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4539</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2634#comment-4539</guid>
		<description>I would suggest they continue to copy from mac OSX so that at least there are some good features and windows doesn&#039;t get left too far behind. The important ideas are ergonomics, logic, compatability and stability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest they continue to copy from mac OSX so that at least there are some good features and windows doesn&#8217;t get left too far behind. The important ideas are ergonomics, logic, compatability and stability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
