<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing camcorders. In a fish tank.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/23/testing-camcorders-in-a-fish-tank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/23/testing-camcorders-in-a-fish-tank/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/23/testing-camcorders-in-a-fish-tank/comment-page-1/#comment-10011</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2559#comment-10011</guid>
		<description>Hi, Matthew.

Okay - found it! I suppose I am a dummy, but when I first viewed this page, the link text - as you can see in this underwater test video -  was in the same colour as the rest of the text, so I didn&#039;t notice it until my cursor went over it just now and showed the link. After viewing, the link text is now red!!

As for the video, I have to say the quality is as poor as I expected after my in air tests. In school, I will recommend this camera is only used for still shots, which are pretty good. I assume that was how the blue fish was taken.

Cheers,
Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Matthew.</p>
<p>Okay &#8211; found it! I suppose I am a dummy, but when I first viewed this page, the link text &#8211; as you can see in this underwater test video &#8211;  was in the same colour as the rest of the text, so I didn&#8217;t notice it until my cursor went over it just now and showed the link. After viewing, the link text is now red!!</p>
<p>As for the video, I have to say the quality is as poor as I expected after my in air tests. In school, I will recommend this camera is only used for still shots, which are pretty good. I assume that was how the blue fish was taken.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/23/testing-camcorders-in-a-fish-tank/comment-page-1/#comment-10008</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2559#comment-10008</guid>
		<description>Okay, so I&#039;m a complete dummy! I can open the still image, but where is the link to see the video? This review really does make me feel stupid! Am I looking right at the link? Am I going blind?!!

Finally, if the still image was taken on the xActi, I am amazed at the quality as my school has just received one of these cameras via the Tesco Schools scheme and in normal video mode in air, the quality is poor: average webcam stuff.

Lastly, getting the images off the camera in an easily useable form is a nightmare using the awful Adobe Elements 4.0 Premiere. I have yet to use a more complicated, non- intuitive piece of software - so disappointing as I am a great fan of Elenmts 2.0 (a stripped down version of Photoshop).

Cheers,

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I&#8217;m a complete dummy! I can open the still image, but where is the link to see the video? This review really does make me feel stupid! Am I looking right at the link? Am I going blind?!!</p>
<p>Finally, if the still image was taken on the xActi, I am amazed at the quality as my school has just received one of these cameras via the Tesco Schools scheme and in normal video mode in air, the quality is poor: average webcam stuff.</p>
<p>Lastly, getting the images off the camera in an easily useable form is a nightmare using the awful Adobe Elements 4.0 Premiere. I have yet to use a more complicated, non- intuitive piece of software &#8211; so disappointing as I am a great fan of Elenmts 2.0 (a stripped down version of Photoshop).</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Sparkes</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/23/testing-camcorders-in-a-fish-tank/comment-page-1/#comment-3876</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sparkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2559#comment-3876</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one of the many wonderful mysteries of our website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one of the many wonderful mysteries of our website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/23/testing-camcorders-in-a-fish-tank/comment-page-1/#comment-3822</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2559#comment-3822</guid>
		<description>Just a quick question, why the heck is the video hosted on Auto Express? :-O

I opened the link to the video page and it was blank, so I viewed the source, to see which site I would need to enable to view the video and it was Autoexpress...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick question, why the heck is the video hosted on Auto Express? :-O</p>
<p>I opened the link to the video page and it was blank, so I viewed the source, to see which site I would need to enable to view the video and it was Autoexpress&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
