<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BT&#8217;s Phorm trial &#8211; the worst excuse ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/09/bts-phorm-trial-the-worst-excuse-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/09/bts-phorm-trial-the-worst-excuse-ever/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/09/bts-phorm-trial-the-worst-excuse-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1728#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>If your trial is sufficiently large or difficult to explain that you can&#039;t comply with the law, then you&#039;re exempt. According to Richard Thomas.

ICO said to Steven Mainwaring... &quot;taking into account the difficulties involved in providing meaningful and clear information to customers ... in this case, this is not an issue we intend to pursue further with BT.&quot;

In the old days, if it was difficult to comply with the law, it usually meant you were about to commit a crime.

BT should not have run the trials if it was difficult to comply with the law.

And if the Information Commissioner can&#039;t enforce the law, bring me someone who can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your trial is sufficiently large or difficult to explain that you can&#8217;t comply with the law, then you&#8217;re exempt. According to Richard Thomas.</p>
<p>ICO said to Steven Mainwaring&#8230; &#8220;taking into account the difficulties involved in providing meaningful and clear information to customers &#8230; in this case, this is not an issue we intend to pursue further with BT.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the old days, if it was difficult to comply with the law, it usually meant you were about to commit a crime.</p>
<p>BT should not have run the trials if it was difficult to comply with the law.</p>
<p>And if the Information Commissioner can&#8217;t enforce the law, bring me someone who can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcernie</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/09/bts-phorm-trial-the-worst-excuse-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>pcernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1728#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>I thought BT were a bad joke &#039;til I heard of Phorm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought BT were a bad joke &#8217;til I heard of Phorm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
