<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Zoom: proof that Microsoft is still capable of amazing technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: justsometwat</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-2/#comment-50585</link>
		<dc:creator>justsometwat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-50585</guid>
		<description>what a bunch of dorks. honestly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a bunch of dorks. honestly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joz</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-2/#comment-15909</link>
		<dc:creator>joz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-15909</guid>
		<description>its not like it is actually intended to afend anybodyin any way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its not like it is actually intended to afend anybodyin any way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joz</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-2/#comment-15903</link>
		<dc:creator>joz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-15903</guid>
		<description>how can you people complain about it when the software is completely free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can you people complain about it when the software is completely free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-2/#comment-11181</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-11181</guid>
		<description>To everyone complaining about browser crashes on this thread, do not forget the Hard Rock Memorabilia site was released to the world back in March 2008 as the very first live site running on Silverlight 2 *BETA* technology. And it was the first beta.

Now that Silverlight 2 if officially released (Oct 14), and Microsoft has worked out most of it&#039;s silly browser bugs, the memorabilia site is pretty dang reliable. It works perfectly fine on IE 6/7/8, Firefox 2/3 (PC and Mac!), Safari 2/3 (including Safari Windows!), Opera, and even the most recent dev build of Google Chrome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To everyone complaining about browser crashes on this thread, do not forget the Hard Rock Memorabilia site was released to the world back in March 2008 as the very first live site running on Silverlight 2 *BETA* technology. And it was the first beta.</p>
<p>Now that Silverlight 2 if officially released (Oct 14), and Microsoft has worked out most of it&#8217;s silly browser bugs, the memorabilia site is pretty dang reliable. It works perfectly fine on IE 6/7/8, Firefox 2/3 (PC and Mac!), Safari 2/3 (including Safari Windows!), Opera, and even the most recent dev build of Google Chrome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-2/#comment-6975</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-6975</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eric...&lt;/strong&gt;

Learn all you can by reading the following article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eric&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Learn all you can by reading the following article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yodaco</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-2/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>yodaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>look... it doesnt realy matter what microsoft try to use to &quot;SELL&quot; us thier crapy software and OS... Nor does it matter that 9 times out of 10 the linux comunity has something up it sleeves to match it, if not better it.

The only thing that matters is... Microsoft want your money... Linux Only Wants your help...

so given the options PAY for windows OR Dont pay for linux... When both are potentialy offering similar packages... which would you choose.

The truth is....
i still us windows

MONOPOLY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look&#8230; it doesnt realy matter what microsoft try to use to &#8220;SELL&#8221; us thier crapy software and OS&#8230; Nor does it matter that 9 times out of 10 the linux comunity has something up it sleeves to match it, if not better it.</p>
<p>The only thing that matters is&#8230; Microsoft want your money&#8230; Linux Only Wants your help&#8230;</p>
<p>so given the options PAY for windows OR Dont pay for linux&#8230; When both are potentialy offering similar packages&#8230; which would you choose.</p>
<p>The truth is&#8230;.<br />
i still us windows</p>
<p>MONOPOLY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anoncowrd</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-2/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>anoncowrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>yeah google maps does that without me having to install a new plugin, oh wait i&#039;m on ubuntu i couldn&#039;t install it even if i wanted to.  I say epic fail for being so late with something that&#039;s been around forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah google maps does that without me having to install a new plugin, oh wait i&#8217;m on ubuntu i couldn&#8217;t install it even if i wanted to.  I say epic fail for being so late with something that&#8217;s been around forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Malek</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Malek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>This can be done on mobile devices by Scalado</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can be done on mobile devices by Scalado</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hwertz</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>hwertz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>I saw an online video demo of this quite a while ago, and it looked cool.  But...
     a) Moonlight is vaporware at this point, I have seen a few screenshots on the site and that&#039;s about it.  Silverlight is very non-portable, just supporting a bare handful of browsers on a very few platforms compared to flash, javascript, java, etc.  Microsoft is I think trying to use this to leverage Windows but instead I think it&#039;ll umm.. de-leverage Silverlight.
     b) I don&#039;t have a point B.  But, really, they should just suck it up and use flash or Javascript, they&#039;re already in common use.
     c) @My Moniker Says:  Yes swf is open.   First, Adobe released full swf specifications.  Second, Adobe has released flash plugin for many platforms, not just 1 version of Windows and 1 version of OSX like Silverlight.  Thirdly, there&#039;s 3rd-party software that does handle swfs, not vaporware like Moonlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw an online video demo of this quite a while ago, and it looked cool.  But&#8230;<br />
     a) Moonlight is vaporware at this point, I have seen a few screenshots on the site and that&#8217;s about it.  Silverlight is very non-portable, just supporting a bare handful of browsers on a very few platforms compared to flash, javascript, java, etc.  Microsoft is I think trying to use this to leverage Windows but instead I think it&#8217;ll umm.. de-leverage Silverlight.<br />
     b) I don&#8217;t have a point B.  But, really, they should just suck it up and use flash or Javascript, they&#8217;re already in common use.<br />
     c) @My Moniker Says:  Yes swf is open.   First, Adobe released full swf specifications.  Second, Adobe has released flash plugin for many platforms, not just 1 version of Windows and 1 version of OSX like Silverlight.  Thirdly, there&#8217;s 3rd-party software that does handle swfs, not vaporware like Moonlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goda</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/06/deep-zoom-proof-that-microsoft-is-still-capable-of-amazing-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Goda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1653#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>im pretty sure that microsoft didn&#039;t invent this. they bought the group that was developing it. microsoft did little work here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im pretty sure that microsoft didn&#8217;t invent this. they bought the group that was developing it. microsoft did little work here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
