Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on June 5th, 2008 by Davey Winder

Moving to Windows 7 will be just as bad as moving to Vista, says Microsoft

Forgive me if I have misread the ‘Business Value of Windows Vista‘ paper that Microsoft has published in an attempt to convince the corporate user to switch to Vista now instead of waiting for the arrival of Windows 7 instead. However, the way I read it, it seems that Microsoft, when it says users jumping from XP to Windows 7 will have “a similar applications compatibility experience… as exists moving to Windows Vista from Windows XP” are actually saying that both migrations are pretty dire.

In fact, Microsoft will argue that the migration will be tougher if users have not moved to Vista already. Now that I can accept, although the migration to Vista from XP will remain a time consuming and problematical one for many people. It seems almost unfair to expect them to go through that twice, so why not wait until Windows 7 and just do it once?

Well, there’s always the better security argument I guess, which has some substance of course, but beyond that I am not getting much feedback from the small business types I meet that suggests there is any real world motivation to make the move. In fact, the business-oriented feedback I get can be best summed up as ‘even though it’s broke, migrating to Vista won’t fix it.’

Joking aside, Microsoft does have a point. Forget whether you choose to believe the corporate VP of Windows product management Mike Nash when he says in the paper’s executive summary that the device and application compatibility situation in Vista is now dramatically better than it was, the thing you have to really think about is whether it will be any better at all if you just wait for the next point release of the OS to come along instead. History would suggest not on your nelly. Nash himself, if an email that was disclosed during the discovery phase of the Vista Capable marketing class action suite is to be believed, knows all about the problems of migration to Vista. Apparently Nash wrote, referring to hardware requirements when upgrading to Vista, that he “got burnt” and ended up with “a $2100 email machine.”

Tags: , , , ,

Posted in: Hardware, Rant, Real World Computing, Software

Permalink | Trackback

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Social Bookmark this article: What is this?

4 Responses to “ Moving to Windows 7 will be just as bad as moving to Vista, says Microsoft ”

  1. Web 2.0 Announcer Says:
    June 6th, 2008 at 9:26 am

    Moving to Windows 7 will be just as bad as moving to Vista, says Microsoft | PC Pro blog…

    [...][...]…

     
  2. Nick Kirby Says:
    June 6th, 2008 at 10:15 pm

    Let me guess “most secure Windows ever!” and the usual rubbish. Now, if they sort out the cluttered UI, cut the install image down to around, ohh, 500mb and get rid of all the fluff and nonsense that gets in the way of doing work, it might be usable.

     
  3. David W Says:
    June 9th, 2008 at 5:30 am

    Microsoft have a good point, to go forward, you always need to leave some baggage behind. Windows problem, until recently, is that they have been very bad at dropping off the dross that is cluttering up the system. They bring something new to the OS, which could push Windows forwards, but in the name of backwards compatibility, they cripple part of the new implementation, which means it doesn’t work like it should, but still cripples poorly written applications from previous generations…

    Every new generation of Windows will cause slightly more compatibility problems than the previous generation. There is no way round it, so upgrading now will cause, theoretically, fewer headaches than waiting for the next version. Those who are holding off of going to Vista for v7, because “Vista is a dog”, when it comes to software and device compatibility are going to even more disappointed.

    I’ve got 10 XP and 10 Vista licences. Apart from my old laptop, which, with 512MB RAM, is just not up to running Vista, the rest of my machines have all been migrated. Yes, it isn’t as spritely as Windows 95, but it isn’t a complete dog either. My Audigy sound card doesn’t work properly, which is annoying, but it plays music and stereo sound, which is all I require from it these days, BUT, that isn’t Microsoft’s fault, CL used Vista as an opportunity to try and generate more sales (as have a lot of manufacturers), but it has backfired, for the most part.

     
  4. HH Says:
    November 13th, 2008 at 6:54 pm

    “Let me guess ?most secure Windows ever!? and the usual rubbish. Now, if they sort out the cluttered UI, cut the install image down to around, ohh, 500mb and get rid of all the fluff and nonsense that gets in the way of doing work, it might be usable.”

    “Cluttered UI”? Methinks you’re mistaking OS X with Windows.

     

Leave a Reply

* required fields

* Will not be published

Categories

Authors

Archives

advertisement

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008