<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s top of the PC Pro class?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/whos-top-of-the-pc-pro-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/whos-top-of-the-pc-pro-class/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr ICT</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/whos-top-of-the-pc-pro-class/comment-page-1/#comment-36271</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr ICT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=813#comment-36271</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have taught myself skills in all these areas, but I am not allowed to teach, because I do not have a degree. How crazy is this ?&quot;

No formal qualification, and not allowed to teach, that is just down right mad!

As a self taught surgeon I feel I have lots to offer the medical profession, I am itching to carry out a crayola oblongata.

Or is that just something from the Simpsons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have taught myself skills in all these areas, but I am not allowed to teach, because I do not have a degree. How crazy is this ?&#8221;</p>
<p>No formal qualification, and not allowed to teach, that is just down right mad!</p>
<p>As a self taught surgeon I feel I have lots to offer the medical profession, I am itching to carry out a crayola oblongata.</p>
<p>Or is that just something from the Simpsons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lamin</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/whos-top-of-the-pc-pro-class/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=813#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>The only surprise is that your team were surprised. GCSE examinations are concerned only with identifying the answers that the exam board expect. They build the model answers into their course specifications, rather than considering anything that is concerned with the application of a subject in the real world.

Schools&#039; current &quot;Hot topic&quot; is &quot;Assessment for Learning&quot; - (Criticise it if you dare!) which should, more correctly, be &quot;Learning  for Assessment&quot;. Everything that is done in a classroom must be directed towards improving marks in examinations - and consequently school League Table scores. &quot;Education&quot; is NOT a consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only surprise is that your team were surprised. GCSE examinations are concerned only with identifying the answers that the exam board expect. They build the model answers into their course specifications, rather than considering anything that is concerned with the application of a subject in the real world.</p>
<p>Schools&#8217; current &#8220;Hot topic&#8221; is &#8220;Assessment for Learning&#8221; &#8211; (Criticise it if you dare!) which should, more correctly, be &#8220;Learning  for Assessment&#8221;. Everything that is done in a classroom must be directed towards improving marks in examinations &#8211; and consequently school League Table scores. &#8220;Education&#8221; is NOT a consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King6m</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/whos-top-of-the-pc-pro-class/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>King6m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=813#comment-690</guid>
		<description>I myself have just done the 2008 GCSE Full Course IT paper and am sorry to say it was more of the same. except for the last question usually on benefits of some it system which was replaced by ones on the Data Protection Act (DPA 1998). a theme which was running all the way through the paper. the majority of the questions seemed to be about the DPA or other laws and very little of the paper was acutely what i would call IT. still i learned in advance their ridiculous answers and so was able (hopefully) to jump through their hoops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself have just done the 2008 GCSE Full Course IT paper and am sorry to say it was more of the same. except for the last question usually on benefits of some it system which was replaced by ones on the Data Protection Act (DPA 1998). a theme which was running all the way through the paper. the majority of the questions seemed to be about the DPA or other laws and very little of the paper was acutely what i would call IT. still i learned in advance their ridiculous answers and so was able (hopefully) to jump through their hoops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Sibley</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/whos-top-of-the-pc-pro-class/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Sibley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 11:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=813#comment-513</guid>
		<description>From 2000 to 2004 I worked in several secondary schools as a teaching assistant. I saw a number of GCSE IT exam papers and was most unimpressed by the quality of the questions. They gave me the impression the examiners were themselves incompetent in key areas.

For example students had to design a leaflet. They were given a coloured logo - The business name was lost amongst the complicated background due to poor contrast of the chosen font colour  Students had to include all the given text.  To do this even at a small text size left no room for headings and sub headings large enough to get attention with enough white space  to make the page layout attractive and enticing to read.

Just to make sure the end result was terrible, dull and poor quality images were provided for inclusion.

Secondary school teaching of IT beyond the application of Office software is very limited.

I know of students studying A Level computing being taught computer graphics by teachers who had little understanding of the power of using layers in Photoshop, and no knowledge of shaping vector graphics with control points.

Digital graphics, DTP, typography and creative design were just not being taught because there was a huge skills gap in this field amongst the IT and Art  teachers. What really stood out, was the fact that the teachers had not bothered to teach themselves, even when suitable software was available on the school network. Any self motivated student would quickly know more than the teachers.

Similarly the application of IT to assist with understanding concepts in other subjects is almost non existent. There is talk of IT across the curriculum, but not much delivery.

School web sites are another disaster area - most of them completely fail W3C standards for HTML, do not even meet WAI Accessibility Level 1, fail CSS, use tables for layout, display poor photographs, and have dull text presentation.

I have taught myself skills in all these areas,  but I am not allowed to teach, because I do not have a degree. How crazy is this ?

School IT departments put  too much emphasis on hardware investment and under invest in software and finding the time to explore and exploit it. 

What all this goes to show is that IT in Education is delivering well below potential. 

The Secretary of State for Schools, the Teachers, and the Exam Boards must do better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From 2000 to 2004 I worked in several secondary schools as a teaching assistant. I saw a number of GCSE IT exam papers and was most unimpressed by the quality of the questions. They gave me the impression the examiners were themselves incompetent in key areas.</p>
<p>For example students had to design a leaflet. They were given a coloured logo &#8211; The business name was lost amongst the complicated background due to poor contrast of the chosen font colour  Students had to include all the given text.  To do this even at a small text size left no room for headings and sub headings large enough to get attention with enough white space  to make the page layout attractive and enticing to read.</p>
<p>Just to make sure the end result was terrible, dull and poor quality images were provided for inclusion.</p>
<p>Secondary school teaching of IT beyond the application of Office software is very limited.</p>
<p>I know of students studying A Level computing being taught computer graphics by teachers who had little understanding of the power of using layers in Photoshop, and no knowledge of shaping vector graphics with control points.</p>
<p>Digital graphics, DTP, typography and creative design were just not being taught because there was a huge skills gap in this field amongst the IT and Art  teachers. What really stood out, was the fact that the teachers had not bothered to teach themselves, even when suitable software was available on the school network. Any self motivated student would quickly know more than the teachers.</p>
<p>Similarly the application of IT to assist with understanding concepts in other subjects is almost non existent. There is talk of IT across the curriculum, but not much delivery.</p>
<p>School web sites are another disaster area &#8211; most of them completely fail W3C standards for HTML, do not even meet WAI Accessibility Level 1, fail CSS, use tables for layout, display poor photographs, and have dull text presentation.</p>
<p>I have taught myself skills in all these areas,  but I am not allowed to teach, because I do not have a degree. How crazy is this ?</p>
<p>School IT departments put  too much emphasis on hardware investment and under invest in software and finding the time to explore and exploit it. </p>
<p>What all this goes to show is that IT in Education is delivering well below potential. </p>
<p>The Secretary of State for Schools, the Teachers, and the Exam Boards must do better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

