<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anyone for Monopoly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/20/anyone-for-monopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/20/anyone-for-monopoly/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: james016</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/20/anyone-for-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>james016</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=732#comment-438</guid>
		<description>PC Pron!!!

Won&#039;t someone think of the Techies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC Pron!!!</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t someone think of the Techies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ockenden</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/20/anyone-for-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ockenden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=732#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Just be thankful it wasn&#039;t a semi-clad piccie of the editorial staff. Or even us RWC contributors. Of course, you&#039;d need a wide screen monitor for the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just be thankful it wasn&#8217;t a semi-clad piccie of the editorial staff. Or even us RWC contributors. Of course, you&#8217;d need a wide screen monitor for the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Goggins</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/20/anyone-for-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Goggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=732#comment-381</guid>
		<description>How can you criticise PC Pro for using that? It&#039;s a standard Setanta advertising shot.  And why should PC Pro&#039;s desire to encourage female readers be based on tacky gimmicks like naked photographs and not the high quality of their jornalism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you criticise PC Pro for using that? It&#8217;s a standard Setanta advertising shot.  And why should PC Pro&#8217;s desire to encourage female readers be based on tacky gimmicks like naked photographs and not the high quality of their jornalism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: girly</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/20/anyone-for-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>girly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=732#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Aiming for a male audience with that photo do you think? If PC pro wants to encourage women readers try a photo of Alan Shearer naked instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aiming for a male audience with that photo do you think? If PC pro wants to encourage women readers try a photo of Alan Shearer naked instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcernie</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/20/anyone-for-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>pcernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=732#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Very true in a lot of regards I&#039;d say, and I&#039;d also like to add that I&#039;m amazed at the amount of people who shell out for these sub packages (they&#039;re sub in every regard far as I can see!).

Wouldn&#039;t you have more fun watching it down the pub in many cases? It could even work out cheaper for some!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true in a lot of regards I&#8217;d say, and I&#8217;d also like to add that I&#8217;m amazed at the amount of people who shell out for these sub packages (they&#8217;re sub in every regard far as I can see!).</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you have more fun watching it down the pub in many cases? It could even work out cheaper for some!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

